Sometimes less is more. Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures.

Reference : Sometimes less is more. Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures.


	Document type :	Scientific journals : Article
	Discipline(s) :	Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Theoretical & cognitive psychology
	To cite this reference:	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/21498

Title :	Sometimes less is more. Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures.
Language :	English
Author, co-author :	Greiff, Samuel [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS) >]
	Stadler, Matthias [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS) >]
	Sonnleitner, Philipp [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Luxembourg Centre for Educational Testing (LUCET) >]
	Wolff, Christian [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS) >]
	Martin, Romain [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS) >]
Publication date :	2015
Journal title :	Intelligence
Publisher :	Elsevier Science
Volume :	50
Pages :	100-113
Peer reviewed :	Yes (verified by ORBi^lu)
Audience :	International
ISSN :	0160-2896
Permalink :	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/21498

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

	File	Commentary	Version	Size	Access
Limited access	Sometimes less is more- Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures .pdf		Publisher postprint	1.27 MB	Request a copy

All documents in ORBi^lu are protected by a user license.