Article (Scientific journals)
Sometimes less is more. Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures.
GREIFF, Samuel; STADLER, Matthias; SONNLEITNER, Philipp et al.
2015In Intelligence, 50, p. 100-113
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Sometimes less is more- Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures .pdf
Publisher postprint (1.3 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
GREIFF, Samuel ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
STADLER, Matthias ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
SONNLEITNER, Philipp  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Luxembourg Centre for Educational Testing (LUCET)
WOLFF, Christian ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
MARTIN, Romain ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Sometimes less is more. Comparing the validity of complex problem solving measures.
Publication date :
2015
Journal title :
Intelligence
ISSN :
0160-2896
Publisher :
Elsevier Science
Volume :
50
Pages :
100-113
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBilu :
since 07 July 2015

Statistics


Number of views
268 (14 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
7 (3 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
37
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
22
OpenCitations
 
30
OpenAlex citations
 
45
WoS citations
 
24

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu