Need for Cognition; Self-Control; Action Orientation; Large-scale Testing; Secondary Education; Replication Study
Résumé :
[en] Self-Control can be defined as the self-initiated effortful process that enables individuals to resist temptation impulses. It is relevant for conducting a healthy and successful life. For university students, Grass et al. (2019) found that Need for Cognition as the tendency to engage in and enjoy thinking, and Action Orientation as the flexible recruitment of control resources in cognitively demanding situations, predict Self-Control. Further, Action Orientation partially mediated the relation between Need for Cognition and Self-Control. In the present conceptual replication study, we investigated the relations between Self-Control, Need for Cognition, and Action Orientation in adolescence (N = 892 9th graders) as a pivotal period for the development of Self-control. We replicated the findings that Need for Cognition and Action Orientation predict Self-Control and that Action Orientation partially mediates the relation between Need for Cognition and Self-Control. In addition, Action Orientation moderates the relation between Need for Cognition and Self-Control. This result implies that in more action-oriented students Need for Cognition more strongly predicted Self-Control than in less action-oriented students. Our findings strengthen theoretical assumptions that Need for Cognition and Action Orientation are important cognitive and behavioral mechanisms that contribute to the successful exertion of Self-Control.
Disciplines :
Education & enseignement
Auteur, co-auteur :
COLLING, Joanne ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > LUCET
WOLLSCHLÄGER, Rachel ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > LUCET
KELLER, Ulrich ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > LUCET
Grass, Julia; Chemnitz University of Technology > Department of Psychology > Personality Psychology and Assessment
Strobel, Anja; Chemnitz University of Technology > Department of Psychology > Personality Psychology and Assessment
Preckel, Franzis; University of Trier > Department of Psychology > Giftedness Research and Education
FISCHBACH, Antoine ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Education and Social Work (DESW)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
The relation between Self-Control, Need for Cognition and Action Orientation in secondary school students: A conceptual replication study
Date de publication/diffusion :
09 juin 2023
Titre du périodique :
PLoS ONE
eISSN :
1932-6203
Maison d'édition :
Public Library of Science, San Franscisco, Etats-Unis - Californie
de Ridder DTD, Lensvelt-Mulders G, Finkenauer C, Stok FM, Baumeister RF. Taking stock of Self-Control: A meta-analysis of how trait Self-Control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2012; 16: 76–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311418749 PMID: 21878607
Moffitt TE, Arseneault L, Belsky D, Dickson N, Hancox RJ, Harrington H, et al. A gradient of childhood Self-Control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011; 108: 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108 PMID: 21262822
Mowlaie M, Abolghasemi A, Aghababaei N. Pathological narcissism, brain behavioral systems and tendency to substance abuse: The mediating role of Self-Control. Personal Individ Differ. 2016; 88: 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.019
Sussman S, McCuller WJ, Dent CW. The associations of social Self-Control, personality disorders, and demographics with drug use among high-risk youth. Addict Behav. 2003; 28: 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00222-8 PMID: 12834658
Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Luzio Boone A. High Self-Control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004; 72: 271–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x PMID: 15016066
Rha J-Y, Montalto CP, Hanna SD. The effect of Self-Control mechanisms on household saving behavior. Financ Couns Plan. 2006; 17: 14.
Duckworth AL. The significance of Self-Control. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011; 108: 2639–2640. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1019725108 PMID: 21300864
Fujita K. On conceptualizing Self-Control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2011; 15: 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311411165 PMID: 21685152
Muraven M, Baumeister RF. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does Self-Control resemble a muscle? Psychol Bull. 2000; 126: 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247 PMID: 10748642
Blair C, Razza RP. Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Dev. 2007; 78: 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x PMID: 17381795
Galla BM, Wood JJ, Tsukayama E, Har K, Chiu AW, Langer DA. A longitudinal multilevel model analysis of the within-person and between-person effect of effortful engagement and academic self-efficacy on academic performance. J Sch Psychol. 2014; 52: 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.04. 001 PMID: 24930821
Hofer M, Kuhnle C, Kilian B, Fries S. Cognitive ability and personality variables as predictors of school grades and test scores in adolescents. Learn Instr. 2012; 22: 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.02.003
Stadler M, Aust M, Becker N, Niepel C, Greiff S. Choosing between what you want now and what you want most: Self-Control explains academic achievement beyond cognitive ability. Personal Individ Differ. 2016; 94: 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.01.029
Grass J, Krieger F, Paulus P, Greiff S, Strobel A, Strobel A. Thinking in action: Need for Cognition predicts Self-Control together with Action Orientation. Blanch A, editor. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0220282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220282 PMID: 31369611
Martin R, Ugen S, Fischbach A, editors. Épreuves Standardisées—Bildungsmonitoring für Luxemburg: Nationaler Bericht 2011 | 2013 [Épreuves Standardisées—School monitoring for Luxembourg: National report 2011 to 2013]. University of Luxembourg, LUCET; 2014. Available: https://men.public.lu/dam-assets/catalogue-publications/statistiques-etudes/statistiques-globales/epreuvesstandardisees.pdf.
Mischel W, Ayduk O, Berman MG, Casey BJ, Gotlib IH, Jonides J, et al. ‘Willpower’ over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011; 6: 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq081 PMID: 20855294
Mischel W, Shoda Y, Peake PK. The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool Delay of Gratification. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54: 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.4.687 PMID: 3367285
Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez M. Delay of Gratification in children. Science. 1989; 244: 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2658056 PMID: 2658056
Watts TW, Duncan GJ, Quan H. Revisiting the marshmallow test: A conceptual replication investigating links between early Delay of Gratification and later outcomes. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29: 1159–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618761661 PMID: 29799765
Zhou Q, Main A, Wang Y. The relations of temperamental effortful control and anger/frustration to Chinese children’s academic achievement and social adjustment: A longitudinal study. J Educ Psychol. 2010; 102: 180–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015908
Duckworth AL, Seligman MEP. Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychol Sci. 2005; 16: 939–944. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x PMID: 16313657
Cacioppo JT, Petty RE. The Need for Cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1982; 42: 116–131. https://doi.org/http%3A//dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
Cacioppo JT, Petty RE, Feinstein JA, Jarvis WBG. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in Need for Cognition. Psychol Bull. 1996; 119: 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
Feist GJ. Predicting interest in and attitudes toward science from personality and Need for Cognition. Personal Individ Differ. 2012; 52: 771–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.01.005
Hill BD, Foster JD, Elliott EM, Shelton JT, McCain J, Gouvier WmD. Need for Cognition is related to higher general intelligence, fluid intelligence, and crystallized intelligence, but not working memory. J Res Personal. 2013; 47: 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.11.001
Keller U, Strobel A, Wollschläger R, Greiff S, Martin R, Vainikainen M-P, et al. A Need for Cognition scale for children and adolescents: Structural analysis and measurement invariance. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2019; 35: 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000370
Luong C, Strobel A, Wollschläger R, Greiff S, Vainikainen M-P, Preckel F. Need for Cognition in children and adolescents: Behavioral correlates and relations to academic achievement and potential. Learn Individ Differ. 2017; 53: 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.10.019
Preckel F. Assessing Need for Cognition in early adolescence: Validation of a German adaptation of the Cacioppo/Petty scale. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2014; 30: 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/ a000170
Fleischhauer M, Enge S, Brocke B, Ullrich J, Strobel A, Strobel A. Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of Need for Cognition to personality and intelligence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010; 36: 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351886 PMID: 19901274
Ginet A, Py J. Le besoin de cognition: Une échelle française pour enfants et ses conséquences au plan sociocognitif [Need for Cognition: A French scale for children and its consequences on a sociocognitive level]. Année Psychol. 2000; 100: 585–627. https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2000.28665
Dickhäuser O, Reinhard M-A. How students build their performance expectancies: The importance of Need for Cognition. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2010; 25: 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0027-4
Colling J, Wollschläger R, Keller U, Preckel F, Fischbach A. Need for Cognition and its relation to academic achievement in different learning environments. Learn Individ Differ. 2022; 93: 102110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102110
Grass J, Strobel A, Strobel A. Cognitive investments in academic success: The role of Need for Cognition at university. Front Psychol. 2017; 8: 790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00790 PMID: 28559876
Tolentino E, Curry L, Leak G. Further validation of the short form of the Need for Cognition scale. Psychol Rep. 1990; 66: 321–322. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.321
Richardson M, Abraham C, Bond R. Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2012; 138: 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838 PMID: 22352812
Bertrams A, Dickhäuser O. University and school students’ motivation for effortful thinking: Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the German Need for Cognition scale. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2010; 26: 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000035
Goodman KM. The effects of viewpoint diversity and racial diversity on Need for Cognition. J Coll Stud Dev. 2017; 58: 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0068
Preckel F, Strobel A. Need for Cognition—Kinderskala (NFC-KIDS): Eine Skala zur Erfassung der kognitiven Motivation bei Grundschulkindern [Need for Cognition scale for children (NFC-KIDS): A scale for the assessment of cognitive motivation in primary school children]. Hogrefe; 2017.
Soubelet A, Salthouse TA. Does Need for Cognition have the same meaning at different ages? Assessment. 2017; 24: 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116636449 PMID: 26944684
Kuhl J. Individual differences in self-regulation. In: Heckhausen J, Heckhausen H, editors. Motivation and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. pp. 296–322.
Kuhl J. A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich PR, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 111–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50034-2
Kuhl J. Action versus State Orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control scale (ACS-90). In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Volition and personality: Action versus State Orientation. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers; 1994.
Jaramillo F, Spector PE. The effect of Action Orientation on the academic performance of undergraduate marketing majors. J Mark Educ. 2004; 26: 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475304268780
Dietrich S, Latzko B. Action Orientation in novice pre-service teachers: A predictor for academic success and academic progress. Perform Enhanc Health. 2020; 7: 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2019.100156
Diefendorff JM. Examination of the roles of Action-State Orientation and goal orientation in the goal-setting and performance process. Hum Perform. 2004; 17: 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327043hup1704_2
Wolf BM, Herrmann M, Brandstätter V. Self-efficacy vs. Action Orientation: Comparing and contrasting two determinants of goal setting and goal striving. J Res Personal. 2018; 73: 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.11.001
Leung M-T, Wong K-Y. The structural model on the roles of achievement emotions between action control and learning strategies of undergraduates in Hong Kong. Adelaide; 2013. Available: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED603293.pdf.
Baumeister RF. Ego depletion and Self-Control failure: An energy model of the self’s executive function. Self Identity. 2002; 1: 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/152988602317319302
Duckworth AL, Steinberg L. Unpacking Self-Control. Child Dev Perspect. 2015; 9: 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12107 PMID: 25821515
Inzlicht M, Schmeichel BJ. What Is ego depletion? Toward a mechanistic revision of the resource model of Self-Control. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012; 7: 450–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1745691612454134 PMID: 26168503
Kotabe HP, Hofmann W. On integrating the components of Self-Control. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 10: 618–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615593382 PMID: 26386000
Bertrams A, Dickhäuser O. Passionate thinkers feel better: Self-Control capacity as mediator of the relationship between Need for Cognition and affective adjustment. J Individ Differ. 2012; 33: 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000081
Bertrams A, Dickhäuser O. High-school students’ Need for Cognition, Self-Control capacity, and school achievement: Testing a mediation hypothesis. Learn Individ Differ. 2009; 19: 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.06.005
Dang J, Xiao S, Shi Y, Mao L. Action Orientation overcomes the ego depletion effect. Scand J Psychol. 2015; 56: 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12184 PMID: 25491068
Gröpel P, Baumeister RF, Beckmann J. Action versus State Orientation and Self-Control performance after depletion. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014; 40: 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0146167213516636 PMID: 24501045
Wolff M, Krönke K-M, Venz J, Kräplin A, Bühringer G, Smolka MN, et al. Action versus State Orientation moderates the impact of executive functioning on real-life Self-Control. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016; 145: 1635–1653. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000229 PMID: 27736135
Hagger MS, Wood C, Stiff C, Chatzisarantis NLD. Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136: 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019486 PMID: 20565167
Carter EC, McCullough ME. Publication bias and the limited strength model of Self-Control: Has the evidence for Ego Depletion been overestimated? Front Psychol. 2014;5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00823 PMID: 25126083
Englert C, Bertrams A. Again, no evidence for or against the existence of Ego Depletion: Opinion on “A multi-site preregistered paradigmatic test of the Ego Depletion effect”. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15: 658890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.658890 PMID: 34025377
Lurquin JH, Miyake A. Challenges to Ego-Depletion research go beyond the replication crisis: A need for tackling the conceptual crisis. Front Psychol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00568 PMID: 28458647
Forestier C, de Chanaleilles M, Boisgontier MP, Chalabaev A. From Ego Depletion to Self-Control fatigue: A review of criticisms along with new perspectives for the investigation and replication of a multicomponent phenomenon. Motiv Sci. 2022; 8: 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000262
Vink M, Gladwin TE, Geeraerts S, Pas P, Bos D, Hofstee M, et al. Towards an integrated account of the development of self-regulation from a neurocognitive perspective: A framework for current and future longitudinal multi-modal investigations. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020; 45: 100829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100829 PMID: 32738778
Silvers JA. Adolescence as a pivotal period for emotion regulation development. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022; 44: 258–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.023 PMID: 34781238
Casey BJ. Beyond simple models of Self-Control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behavior. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015; 66: 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015156 PMID: 25089362
Rice F, Frederickson N, Seymour J. Assessing pupil concerns about transition to secondary school: Pupil concerns about transition. Br J Educ Psychol. 2011; 81: 244–263. https://doi.org/10.1348/ 000709910X519333 PMID: 21542817
Zeedyk MS, Gallacher J, Henderson M, Hope G, Husband B, Lindsay K. Negotiating the transition from primary to secondary school: Perceptions of pupils, parents and teachers. Sch Psychol Int. 2003; 24: 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034303024001010
Anderson LW, Jacobs J, Schramm S, Splittgerber F. School transitions: Beginning of the end or a new beginning? Int J Educ Res. 2000; 33: 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00020-3
Madjar N, Cohen V, Shoval G. Longitudinal analysis of the trajectories of academic and social motivation across the transition from elementary to middle school. Educ Psychol. 2018; 38: 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1341623
Allemand M, Job V, Mroczek DK. Self-control development in adolescence predicts love and work in adulthood. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019; 117: 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000229 PMID: 30550330
Crandall CS, Sherman JW. On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2016; 66: 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.002
Derksen M, Morawski J. Kinds of replication: Examining the meanings of “conceptual replication” and “direct replication.” Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022; 174569162110411. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 17456916211041116 PMID: 35245130
Little TD. Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press; 2013.
MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007; 58: 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 PMID: 16968208
Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH. Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. Psychol Methods. 2001; 6: 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.6.2.115 PMID: 11411437
Iacobucci D. Mediation analysis. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984966
American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychological Association; 2017. Available: https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017. pdf.
Bertrams A, Dickhäuser O. Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität: Eine deutsche Adaptation der Kurzform der Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D) [Measuring dispositional Self-Control capacity: A German adaptation of the short form of the Self-Control scale (SCS-K-D)]. Diagnostica. 2009; 55: 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.55.1.2
Brevers D, Foucart J, Verbanck P, Turel O. Examination of the validity and reliability of the French version of the brief Self-Control scale. Can J Behav Sci Rev Can Sci Comport. 2017; 49: 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000086 PMID: 29200467
Ellis LK, Rothbart MK. Revision of the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire. Poster Present 2001 Bienn Meet Soc Res Child Dev Minneap Minn. 2001.
Darpy D. La procrastination du consommateur: Une contribution à l’éxplication du report d’achat [Consumer procrastination: A contribution to the explanation of the postponement of purchase]. Gestion et management, Université Paris Dauphine. 1999.
Newsom JT. Longitudinal structural equation modeling. A comprehensive introduction. New York: Routledge; 2015.
Jamshidian M, Mata M. Advances in analysis of mean and covariance structure when data are incomplete. Handbook of latent variable and related models. Elsevier; 2007. pp. 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044452044-9/50005-7
Schlomer GL, Bauman S, Card NA. Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2010; 57: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018082 PMID: 21133556
Little TD, Jorgensen TD, Lang KM, Moore EWG. On the joys of missing data. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014; 39: 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst048 PMID: 23836191
Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF. To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2002; 9: 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15328007SEM0902_1
Little TD, Bovaird JA, Widaman KF. On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product Terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2006; 13: 497–519. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1304_1
Kramer A-W, Van Duijvenvoorde ACK, Krabbendam L, Huizenga HM. Individual differences in adolescents’ willingness to invest cognitive effort: Relation to Need for Cognition, motivation, and cognitive capacity. Cogn Dev. 2021; 57: 100978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100978
Boehm B, Ugen S, Fischbach A, Keller U, Lorphelin D. Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse in Luxemburg [Summary of the results in Luxembourg]. In: Ministry of Education Children and Youth SCRIPT, University of Luxembourg, LUCET, editors. PISA 2015: Nationaler Bericht Luxemburg [PISA 2015: National Report Luxembourg]. 2016. pp. 4–12. Available: https://men.public.lu/dam-assets/cataloguepublications/statistiques-etudes/secondaire/pisa-2015-de.pdf.
Hadjar A, Fischbach A, Backes S. Bildungsungleichheiten im luxemburgischen Sekundarschulsystem aus zeitlicher Perspektive [Educational inequalities in the Luxembourgish secondary education system in temporal perspective]. In: University of Luxembourg, LUCET, Ministry of Education, Children and Youth, SCRIPT, editors. Nationaler Bildungsbericht Luxemburg 2018 [National Education Report for Luxembourg 2018]. 2018. pp. 58–82. Available: https://men.public.lu/dam-assets/cataloguepublications/statistiques-etudes/themes-transversaux/nationaler-bildungsbericht-luxemburg-2018. pdf.
Lenz T, Heinz A. Das Luxemburgische Schulsystem: Einblicke und Trends [The Luxembourgish school system: Insights and trends]. In: University of Luxembourg, LUCET, Ministry of Education, Children and Youth, SCRIPT, editors. Nationaler Bildungsbericht Luxemburg 2018 [National Education Report for Luxembourg 2018]. 2018. pp. 23–34. Available: https://men.public.lu/dam-assets/catalogue-publications/statistiques-etudes/themes-transversaux/nationaler-bildungsberichtluxemburg-2018.pdf.
Deng Y, Yao X. Person-environment fit and proactive socialization: Reciprocal relationships in an academic environment. J Vocat Behav. 2020; 120: 103446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103446
Gillet N, Vallerand RJ, Lafrenière M-AK. Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Soc Psychol Educ. 2012; 15: 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11218-011-9170-2
Gottfried AE, Fleming JS, Gottfried AW. Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. J Educ Psychol. 2001; 93: 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3
Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Stud High Educ. 2002; 27: 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359
Duckworth AL, Kern ML. A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of Self-Control measures. J Res Personal. 2011; 45: 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.004 PMID: 21643479
Allom V, Panetta G, Mullan B, Hagger MS. Self-report and behavioural approaches to the measurement of Self-Control: Are we assessing the same construct? Personal Individ Differ. 2016; 90: 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.051
Nishiguchi Y, Takano K, Tanno Y. The Need for Cognition mediates and moderates the association between depressive symptoms and impaired effortful control. Psychiatry Res. 2016; 241: 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.092 PMID: 27152904
Hanel PHP, Vione KC. Do student samples provide an accurate estimate of the general public? Voracek M, editor. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0168354. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168354 PMID: 28002494
Peterson RA. On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. J Consum Res. 2001; 28: 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1086/323732
