health education; maternity care models; midwifery; midwifery practice; public perceptions
Abstract :
[en] Introduction: Knowledge of midwives’ competencies and preferences for maternity care providers play an important role in shaping care-seeking behavior and the utilization of midwifery-led models of care. However, limited research has explored these aspects among young adults, particularly in multicultural contexts such as Luxembourg.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among university students in Luxembourg using an online survey based on the validated Midwifery Profiling Questionnaire (MidProQ). The questionnaire assessed knowledge of midwives’ legal competencies during pregnancy, labor, and childbirth, as well as preferred and perceived central maternity care providers. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to examine associations between knowledge and sociodemographic characteristics.
Results: A total of 133 participants were included, the majority being female (75.9%) and aged 18–24 years (60.2%). Knowledge of midwives’ legal competencies varied significantly by gender, age, language background, and educational level. Female participants and those enrolled in advanced or health-related programs demonstrated higher levels of agreement with midwives’ competencies. Preferences for maternity care providers were stage-specific: obstetricians were predominantly preferred and perceived as central during pregnancy, whereas midwives were more frequently preferred and perceived as central during labor and childbirth.
Discussion: University students in Luxembourg demonstrate knowledge of midwives’ legal competencies that varies significantly by gender, age, language background, and educational level, alongside stage-specific preferences for maternity care providers. These findings highlight the need for targeted, culturally sensitive educational and policy strategies to improve public understanding of midwives’ roles. Strengthening awareness may support informed decision-making, promote appropriate utilization of midwifery-led care, and contribute to workforce sustainability and the development of midwifery-led models of care in Luxembourg and similar multicultural settings.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
VERMEULEN, Joris ; University of Luxembourg ; VUB - Vrije Universiteit Brussel > Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy
Fobelets, Maaike; Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
PIERRON, Annabelle ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (DHML)
GREVISSE, Christian ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (DHML) > Medical Education
Alborino-Rings, Anna-Cristina; Association Luxembourgeoise des Sages-Femmes
von Laufenberg, Kristel; Association Luxembourgeoise des Sages-Femmes
TRIEU, Thanh-Van ; University of Luxembourg ; Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg
Buyl, Ronald; Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
GHANCHI, Ali ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences (DHML)
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Knowledge and perceptions of the midwifery profession among university students in Luxembourg
Publication date :
10 June 2026
Journal title :
Frontiers in global women's health
eISSN :
2673-5059
Publisher :
Frontiers Media SA
Special issue title :
Education and Leadership for Midwifery Models of Care
1. Lavender T Chapple J. An exploration of midwives’ views of the current system of maternity care in England. Midwifery. (2004) 20(4):324–34. 10.1016/j.midw.2004.01.005, 15571881.
2. Newick L Vares T Dixon L Johnston J Guilliland K. A midwife who knows me: women tertiary Students’ perceptions of midwifery. N Z Coll Midwives J. (2013) (47):5–9. Available online at: https://www.midwife.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Jnl-47-art-1-A-Midwife-Who-Knows-Me.pdf.
3. Edmonds JK Cwiertniewicz T Stoll K. Childbirth education prior to pregnancy? Survey findings of childbirth preferences and attitudes among young women. J Perinat Educ. (2015) 24(2):93–101. 10.1891/1058-1243.24.2.93, 26957892.
4. Vermeulen J Swinnen E D'Haenens F Buyl R Beeckman K. Women’s preferences and knowledge about the legal competences of midwives in Brussels, Belgium. A descriptive observational study. Midwifery. (2016) 40:177–86. 10.1016/j.midw.2016.07.002, 27450589.
5. Christiaens W Verhaeghe M Bracke P. Childbirth expectations and experiences in Belgian and Dutch models of maternity care. J Reprod Infant Psychol. (2008) 26(4):309–22. 10.1080/02646830802350872.
6. Cooper T Lavender DT. Women’s perceptions of a midwife’s role: an initial investigation. Br J Midwifery. (2013) 21(4):264–73. 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.4.264.
7. Wilson KL Sirois FM. Birth attendant choice and satisfaction with antenatal care: the role of birth philosophy, relational style, and health self-efficacy. J Reprod Infant Psychol. (2010) 28(1):69–83. 10.1080/02646830903190946.
8. van Haaren-ten Haken T Pavlova M Hendrix M Nieuwenhuijze M de Vries R Nijhuis J. Eliciting preferences for key attributes of intrapartum care in The Netherlands. Birth. (2014) 41(2):185–94. 10.1111/birt.12081, 24702440.
9. Règlement grand-ducal déterminant le statut, les attributions et les règles de l’exercice de la profession de santé de sage-femme [Grand Ducal Regulation9 determining the status, responsibilities, and rules for the practice of the healthcare profession of midwife] (2019). Available online at: https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/leg/rgd/2019/11/22/a794/jo (Accessed February 2, 2026).
10. Vermeulen J Luyben A O’Connell R Gillen P Escuriet R Fleming V. Failure or progress?: the current state of the professionalisation of midwifery in Europe. Eur J Midwifery. (2019) 3:1–9. 10.18332/ejm/115038, 33537580.
11. Vermeulen J Weber N Klein Y Von Laufenberg K Friedel M Ghanchi A. Rethinking midwifery education in the grand duchy of Luxembourg: charting a new milestone. Eur J Midwifery. (2024) 8:1–8. 10.18332/ejm/195630.
12. Ayed A Aqtam I Malak MZ Toqan D Hammad BM Qaddumi J, et al. Insights into the relationship between emotional intelligence and critical thinking among nursing students. BMC Nurs. (2025) 24(1):1107. 10.1186/s12912-025-03782-7, 40849675.
13. Lair-Hillion M. Etat des Lieux des Professions Médicales et des Professions de Santé au Luxembourg: Rapport Final et Recommandations. Luxembourg: Sante et Prospectives (2019).
14. Margareta J Elenor K Ingrid S Helena V. Migrant women with cultural doula support during pregnancy and after childbirth as a complement to midwifery care in Sweden—an interview study. Midwifery. (2025) 146:104420. 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104420, 40239310.
15. Ayed A Aqtam I Abusaif R Abu Tabeekh R Zaidan D Abu Alhaijaa M. Knowledge regarding kangaroo mother care among nurses in neonatal intensive care units. SAGE Open Nurs. (2025) 11:23779608251337320. 10.1177/23779608251337320, 40297482.
16. Vermeulen J Peersman W Quadvlieg L Fobelets M De Clercq G Swinnen E, et al. Development and validation of the midwife profiling questionnaire assessing women’s preferred perinatal care professional and knowledge of midwives’ legal competences. Sex Reprod Healthc. (2018) 16:23–32. 10.1016/j.srhc.2018.01.003, 29804771.
17. Maneesriwongul W Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. (2004) 48(2):175–86. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x, 15369498.
18. Wyrębek A Klimanek J Misztal A Szlendak B Bączek G. Knowledge of women in Poland on the profession and competencies of a midwife. Eur J Midwifery. (2024) 8:1–7 10.18332/ejm/183910.
19. Mivšek A Vermeulen J. How do slovenian women perceive midwifery competencies—pilot study using the slovenian version of midwifery profiling questionnaire (MidProQ). Midwifery. (2023) 118:103601. 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103601.
20. Khan M Dave A Benton M Moss N Kaler M. Health literacy interventions for pregnant women with limited language proficiency in the country they live in: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. (2024) 24. 10.1186/s12889-024-20747-8.
21. Pandey M Maina G Amoyaw J Li Y Kamrul R Michaels C, et al. Impacts of English language proficiency on healthcare access, use, and outcomes among immigrants: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. (2021):21. 10.1186/s12913-021-06750-4.
22. Sriram S Almutairi F Albadrani M. Midwife-Led versus obstetrician-led perinatal care for low-risk pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1.4 million pregnancies. J Clin Med. (2024) 13:1–32. 10.3390/jcm13226629.
23. Van Der Pijl M Kasperink M Hollander M Verhoeven C Kingma E De Jonge A. Client-care provider interaction during labour and birth as experienced by women: respect, communication, confidentiality and autonomy. PLoS One. (2021) 16:1–21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0246697.
24. Lunda P Minnie C Benadé P. Women’s experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2018) 18:2–11. 10.1186/s12884-018-1755-8, 29291724.
25. Beier L Luyben A Thaqi Q Naef R. Enhancing collaboration between midwives and obstetricians: a qualitative content analysis study. WomenBirth. (2025) 38(4):101929. 10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101929.
26. Avery M Jennings J Germano E Andrighetti T Autry A Dau K, et al. Interprofessional education between midwifery students and obstetrics and gynecology residents: an American college of nurse-midwives and American college of obstetricians and gynecologists collaboration. J Midwifery Womens Health. (2020) 65:257–64. 10.1111/jmwh.13057, 31965745.
27. Aqtam I Ayed A Toqan D Salameh B Abd Elhay ES Zaben K, et al. The relationship between stress and resilience of nurses in intensive care units during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inquiry. (2023) 60:469580231179876. 10.1177/00469580231179876, 37278278.
28. Petit-Steeghs V Lips S Schuitmaker-Warnaar T Broerse J. Client-centred maternity care from women’s perspectives: need for responsiveness. Midwifery. (2019) 74:76–83. 10.1016/j.midw.2019.03.016, 30928814.
29. WHO European Region. 11 smallest countries in WHO European Region adopt landmark statement committing to key actions to improve people’s health (2023). Available online at: https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/07-06-2023-11-smallest-countries-in-who-european-region-adopt-landmark-statement-committing-to-key-actions-to-improve-people-s-health (Accessed March 12, 2026).
30. O'Connell MA Sosa G. Midwifery in Abu Dhabi: a descriptive survey of midwives. Women Birth. (2023) 36(4):e439–e44. 10.1016/j.wombi.2023.02.002.
