Why Would Professionals Choose to Use a Robot with Their Clients with Autism? Applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Determine Professionals' Intentions
CHARPIOT, Louise; COSTA, Andreia; STEFFGEN, Georges
2024 • In ACM Transactions on Human - Robot Interaction, 14 (1), p. 1-23
Autism; Health and education; Intention to use; Professionals; Robots; Assistive robots; Online surveys; Preliminary analysis; Professional; Real-world; Social norm; Theory of Planned Behavior; Human-Computer Interaction; Artificial Intelligence
Abstract :
[en] Robots are thought to be able to address some of society's challenges in autism care and education. Robots may extend services and provide them in personalised, repeated, and playful ways. However, it is still largely unknown to what extent professionals intend to use robots and what determines their intentions. Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour framework, we aimed to better understand the determinants behind professionals' intentions to use robots with their clients with autism. We conducted an online survey, to which 447 professionals (e.g., psychologists) working with people with autism answered. Our results indicate moderate and well-predicted intentions for the enquired professionals to use a robot with their clients with autism. We found that attitude and perceived social norms are the main predictors of their intentions. Our results also point to the significant and positive influence of moral norms on the attitudes of professionals. Additionally, our preliminary analysis of underlying beliefs to the assessed predictors of intention enables a better understanding on how professionals perceive the place of robots in their work. These results can inspire roboticists who want to build assistive robots for the real world and guide stakeholders when implementing such robots in the health and education sectors.
Disciplines :
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
COSTA, Andreia ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Health and Behaviour
Why Would Professionals Choose to Use a Robot with Their Clients with Autism? Applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour to Determine Professionals' Intentions
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https://www. hakjisa. co. kr/common_file/bbs_DSM-5_Update_ October2018_NewMaster. pdf
M. Elsabbagh, G. Divan, Y. J. Koh, Y. S. Kim, S. Kauchali, C. Marcín, C. Montiel-Nava, V. Patel, C. S. Paula, C. Wang, et al. (2012). Global prevalence of autism and other pervasive developmental disorders. Autism Research 5, 3 (2012), 160-179. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1002/aur. 239
E. Simonoff, A. Pickles, T. Charman, S. Chandler, T. Loucas, and G. Baird. (2008). Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: Prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 47, 8 (2008), 921-929. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1097/CHI. 0b013e318179964f
A. Gustavsson, M. Svensson, F. Jacobi, C. Allgulander, J. Alonso, E. Beghi, R. Dodel, M. Ekman, C. Faravelli, L. Fratiglioni, et al. (2011). Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. European Neuropsychopharmacology 21, 10 (2011), 718-779. https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. euroneuro. 2011. 08. 008
A. P. Costa, L. Charpiot, F. R. Lera, P. Ziafati, A. Nazarikhorram, L. Van Der Torre, and G. Steffgen. (2018). More attention and less repetitive and stereotyped behaviors using a robot with children with autism. In Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 534-539. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1109/ROMAN. 2018. 8525747
D. J. Ricks and M. B. Colton. (2010). Trends and considerations in robot-assisted autism therapy. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 4354-4359. https://doi. org/10. 1109/ROBOT. 2010. 5509327
G. Bird, J. Leighton, C. Press, and C. Heyes. (2007). Intact automatic imitation of human and robot actions in autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 274, 1628 (2007), 3027-3031. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1098/rspb. 2007. 1019
J. Wainer, E. Ferrari, K. Dautenhahn, and B. Robins. (2010). The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 5 (2010), 445-455. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s00779-009-0266-z
B. Robins, P. Dickerson, P. Stribling, and K. Dautenhahn. (2004). Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in robot-human interaction. Interaction Studies 5, 2 (2004), 161-198. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1075/ is. 5. 2. 02rob
A. R. Taheri, M. Alemi, A. Meghdari, H. R. PourEtemad, and N. M. Basiri. (2014). Social robots as assistants for autism therapy in Iran: Research in progress. In Proceedings of the 2nd RSI/ISM International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM) 760-766. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1109/ICRoM. 2014. 6990995
B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, R. Te Boekhorst, and A. Billard. (2005). Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: Can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Universal Access in the Information Society 4, 2 (2005), 105-120. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s10209-005-0116-3
C. A. Huijnen, M. A. Lexis, and L. P. de Witte. (2016). Matching robot KASPAR to autism spectrum disorder (ASD) therapy and educational goals. International Journal of Social Robotics 8, 4 (2016), 445-455. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s12369-016-0369-4
C. A. Huijnen, M. A. Lexis, R. Jansens, and L. P. de Witte. (2019). Roles, strengths, and challenges of using robots in interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 49, 1 (2019), 11-21. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s10803-018-3683-x
I. Zubrycki and G. Granosik. (2016). Understanding therapists' needs and attitudes towards robotic support: The Roboterapia project. International Journal of Social Robotics 8, 4 (2016), 553-563. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s12369-016-0372-9
D. Conti, S. Di Nuovo, S. Buono, and A. Di Nuovo. (2017). Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: A study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals. International Journal of Social Robotics 9, 1 (2017), 51-62. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s12369-016-0359-6
J. Kossewska and J. Kosowska. (2020). Acceptance of robot-mediated teaching and therapy for children with atypical development by polish professionals. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 17, 1 (2020), 21-30. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1111/jppi. 12296
I. Ajzen. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 2 (1991), 179-211. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
M. Fishbein and I Ajzen. (2011). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Psychology Press. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 4324/9780203838020.
A. Schwarzand and W. Chin. (2007). Looking forward: Toward an understanding of the nature and definition of IT acceptance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8, 4 (2007), 230-243. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https://uh-ir. tdl. org/server/api/core/bitstreams/cac3ea89-e0a9-4a9d-b961-1b2c192e5dab/content
V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27, 3 (2003) 425-478. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 2307/30036540
G. Godin and G Kok. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion 11, 2 (1996), 87-98. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 4278/0890-1171-11. 2. 87
C. J. Armitage and M. Conner. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology 40, 4 (2001), 471-499. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1348/014466601164939
I. Ajzen. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2, 4 (2020), 314-324. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1002/hbe2. 195
T. Teo and C. Beng Lee. (2010). Explaining the intention to use technology among student teachers: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Campus-Wide Information Systems 27, 2 (2010), 60-67. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1108/10650741011033035
J. Lee, F. A. Cerreto, and J Lee. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and teachers' decisions regarding use of educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 13, 1 (2010), 152-164. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https: //www. jstor. org/stable/jeductechsoci. 13. 1. 152.
J. Fishman, R. Beidas, E. Reisinger, and D. S. Mandell. (2018). The utility of measuring intentions to use best practices: A longitudinal study among teachers supporting students with autism. Journal of School Health 88, 5 (2018), 388-395. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1111/josh. 12618
B. Ingersoll, D. Straiton, K. Casagrande, and K. Pickard. (2018). Community providers' intentions to use a parentmediated intervention for children with ASD following training: An application of the theory of planned behavior. BMC Research Notes 11, 1 (2018), 1-6. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1186/s13104-018-3879-3
A. Bandura. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84, 2 (1977), 191. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1037/0033-295X. 84. 2. 191
J. J. Diehl, L. M. Schmitt, M. Villano, and C. R. Crowell. (2012). The clinical use of robots for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A critical review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 6, 1 (2012), 249-262. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. rasd. 2011. 05. 006
B. Robins, K. Dautenhahn, and P. Dickerson. (2009). From isolation to communication: A case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. Advances in Computer-Human Interactions 2009 (2009), 205-211. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1109/ACHI. 2009. 32
E. Shih, and H. J. Schau. (2011). To justify or not to justify: The role of anticipated regret on consumers' decisions to upgrade technological innovations. Journal of Retailing 87, 2 (2011), 242-251. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. jretai. 2011. 01. 006
R. Q. Stafford, E. Broadbent, C. Jayawardena, U. Unger, I. H. Kuo, A. Igic, R. Wong, N. M. Kerse, C. I. Watson, and B. A. MacDonald. (2010). Improved robot attitudes and emotions at a retirement home after meeting a robot. In Proceedings of the International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 82-87. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1109/ROMAN. 2010. 5598679
M. M. De Graaf, and S. B. Allouch. (2013). Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 61, 12 (2013), 1476-1486. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. robot. 2013. 07. 007
A. Rivis, P. Sheeran, and C. J. Armitage. (2009). Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 39, 12 (2009), 2985-3019. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1559-1816. 2009. 00558. x
R. M. Allinder. (1994). The relationship between efficacy and the instructional practices of special education teachers and consultants. Teacher Education and Special Education 17, 2 (1994), 86-95. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1177/ 088840649401700203
G. Sang, M. Valcke, J. Van Braak, and J. Tondeur. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education 54, 1 (2010), 103-112. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. compedu. 2009. 07. 010
R. A. Vannatta, and F. Nancy. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36, 3 (2004), 253-271. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https://researchspace. auckland. ac. nz/bitstream/handle/2292/45028/whole. pdf?sequence=2
N. Schwarz and G. L. Clore. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 3 (1983), 513. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1037/0022-3514. 45. 3. 513
R. P. Bagozzi. (1989). An investigation of the role of affect and moral evaluations in the purposive behaviour model of attitude. British Journal of Social Psychology 25 (1989), 95-107. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 2044-8309. 1989. tb00851. x
I. Ajzen and B. L. Driver. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Leisure Sciences 13 (1991), 185-204. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1080/ 01490409109513137
M. L. Richins. (1997). Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research 24, 2 (1997), 127-146. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1086/209499
R. P. Bagozzi and K. H Lee. (1999). Consumer resistance to, and acceptance of, innovations. Advances in Consumer Research 26, 1 (1999). Retrieved April 4, 20242 from https://openurl. ebsco. com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A10%3A6972938/ detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar{&}id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A83144281{&}crl=c
E. Shih and H. J. Schau. (2011). To justify or not to justify: The role of anticipated regret on consumers' decisions to upgrade technological innovations. Journal of Retailing 87, 2 (2011), 242-251. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. jretai. 2011. 01. 006
C. P. Kirk, S. D. Swain, and J. E. Gaskin. (2015). I'm proud of it: Consumer technology appropriation and psychological ownership. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 23, 2 (2015), 166-184. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1080/10696679. 2015. 1002335.
L. Watson and M. T. Spence. (2007). Causes and consequences of emotions on consumer behaviour: A review and integrative cognitive appraisal theory. European Journal of Marketing 41, 5/6 (2007), 487-511. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1108/03090560710737570
A. A. Anderson. (1996). Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems. Computers in Human Behavior 12, 1 (1996), 61-77. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https://eric. ed. gov/?id=EJ518424
J. W. Kotrlik and D. H. Redmann. (2009). Technology adoption for use in instruction by secondary technology education teachers. Journal of Technology Education 21, 1 (2009), 44-59. Retrieved April 4, 2024 https://scholar. lib. vt. edu/ejournals/JTE/v21n1/pdf/kotrlik. pdf.
M. Heerink, B. Kröse, V. Evers, and B. Wielinga. (2010). Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The Almere model. International Journal of Social Robotics 2, 4 (2010), 361-375. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s12369-010-0068-5.
M. Heerink, B. Kröse, V. Evers, and B. Wielinga. (2010). Relating conversational expressiveness to social presence and acceptance of an assistive social robot. Virtual Reality 14 (2010), 77-84. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1007/s10055-009-0142-1
S. H. Schwartz and J. A Howard. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In Altruism and Helping Behavior: Social, Personality, and Developmental Perspectives. P. J. Rushton and R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 91.
A. Rivis, P. Sheeran, and C. J. Armitage. (2009). Expanding the affective and normative components of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis of anticipated affect and moral norms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 39, 12 (2009), 2985-3019. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1559-1816. 2009. 00558. x
S. Vallor. (2020). Carebots and caregivers: Sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. In Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics. Routledge, 137-154. DOI: http://doi. org/10. 1007/s13347-011-0015-x.
M. H. Dembo, and S. Gibson. (1985). Teachers' sense of efficacy: An important factor in school improvement. The Elementary School Journal 86, 2 (1985), 173-184. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1086/461441
G. Sang, M. Valcke, J. Van Braak, and J. Tondeur. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education 54, 1 (2010), 103-112. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. compedu. 2009. 07. 010
R. M. Allinder. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial and Special Education 16, 4 (1995), 247-254. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1177/ 074193259501600408
M. Dean, A. Arvola, M. Vassallo, L. Lähteenmäki, M. M. Raats, A. Saba, and R. Shepherd. (2006). Comparison of elicitation methods for moral and affective beliefs in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite 47, 2 (2006), 244-252. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. appet. 2006. 04. 005
J. Francis, M. P. Eccles, M. Johnston, A. E. Walker, J. M. Grimshaw, R. Foy, E. F. S. Kaner, L. Smith, and Bonetti. (2004). Constructing Questionnaires Based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Manual for Health Services Researchers. Centre for Health Services Research. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https://openaccess. city. ac. uk/id/eprint/1735/1/
A. M. Love, M. D. Toland, E. L. Usher, J. M. Campbell, and A. D. Spriggs. (2019). Can I teach students with autism spectrum disorder?: Investigating teacher self-efficacy with an emerging population of students. Research in Developmental Disabilities 89 (2019), 41-50. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. ridd. 2019. 02. 005
L. A. Ruble, M. D. Toland, J. L. Birdwhistell, J. H. McGrew, and E. L. Usher. (2013). Preliminary study of the autism self-efficacy scale for teachers (ASSET). Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 7, 9 (2013), 1151-1159. DOI: https: //doi. org/10. 1016/j. rasd. 2013. 06. 006
E. M. Skaalvik, and S. Skaalvik. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology 99, 3 (2007), 611. DOI: https: //doi. org/10. 1037/0022-0663. 99. 3. 611
L. Klem. (2000). Structural equation modelling. In Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics. L. G. Grimm and P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), American Psychological Association, 227-260.
L. K. Muthén and B. O. Muthén. (1998-2010). Mplus User'S Guide (6th ed.). Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
S. Vallor. (2020). Carebots and caregivers: Sustaining the ethical ideal of care in the twenty-first century. In Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics. Routledge, 137-154.
H. Le, F. L. Schmidt, J. K. Harter, and K. J. Lauver. (2010). The problem of empirical redundancy of constructs in organizational research: An empirical investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 112, 2 (2010), 112-125. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1016/j. obhdp. 2010. 02. 003
Jean-Louis Berger. (2021). Analyse Factorielle Exploratoire et Analyse en Composantes Principales: Guide Pratique. hal-03436771v2 Retrieved April 30, 2024 from https://hal. science/hal-03436771/document
J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E Anderson. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
R. L. Gorsuch. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment 68, 3 (1997), 532-560. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 1207/s15327752jpa6803_5
K. G. Jöreskog and A. S. Goldberger. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70 (1975), 631-639. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 2307/ 2285946
S. Carlson and C. T. Gadio. (2002). Teacher professional development in the use of technology. In Technologies for Education: Potentials, Parameters, and Prospects. W. D. Haddad and A. Draxler (Eds.), UNESCO and the Academy for Educational Development, 118-132. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https://www. researchgate. net/profile/ GudmundHernes/publication/44828882_Emerging_trends_in_ICT_and_challenges_to_educational_planning/links/ 54415fee0cf2a76a3cc7e389/Emerging-trends-in-ICT-and-challenges-to-educational-planning. pdf#page=124
C. K. Blackwell, A. R. Lauricella, and E. Wartella. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education 77 (2014), 82-90. Retrieved April 4, 2024 from https://cmhd. northwestern. edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Blackwell. Lauricella. Wartella. 2014. Factors-influencingdigital-tech-use-in-early-education. pdf
D. Conti, A. Cattani, S. Di Nuovo, and A Di Nuovo. (2019). Are future psychologists willing to accept and use a humanoid robot in their practice? Italian and English students' perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 10 (2019), 2138. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 3389/fpsyg. 2019. 02138
C. Bartneck, T. Nomura, T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, and K. Kato. (2005). Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots. In Proceedings of the AISB Symposium on Robot Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Human-Robot Interaction, 1-4. DOI: https://doi. org/10. 13140/RG. 2. 2. 22507. 34085
S. Vallor. (2016). Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford University Press.
W. Wallach and C. Allen. (2008). Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford University Press.
