EEG-FPVS; novel words learning; reading; semantic; word representation; Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology; Neurology; Psychiatry and Mental Health; Biological Psychiatry; Behavioral Neuroscience
Abstract :
[en] Reading is a crucial human skill and learning novel written word forms is a life-long process. Here, we tracked the emergence of novel word lexical and neural representations after a training procedure, contrasting two learning methods, in 32 monolingual adults. Half of the novel words were provided with orthographic and phonological information (OP), and half with additional explicit semantic information (OPS). At the neural level, we demonstrate for the first time the sensitivity of EEG recordings with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) to track novel visual word learning. We used an oddball paradigm, with base stimuli (pseudowords) displayed at 10 Hz with deviant stimuli (words) every fifth item (at 2 Hz), in which word-selective responses at 2 Hz demonstrate lexical discrimination. While at pre-test, novel words were not discriminated, results show clear word-selective responses over the left occipital-temporal cortex (VOTC) post-learning with both methods. This finding suggests the creation of orthographic representations for novel words and fits with current views that this region is specialized for the rapid recognition and fast learning of novel word forms. Moreover, the behavioral lexical decision data reveal significant increases in reaction times after learning, for novel words' lexical neighbors, which suggests lexical engagement through competition arising from newly formed representation. Contrary to our expectations, no advantage was found for the OPS method. Instead, results show stronger behavioral and neural changes with the OP method. In the discussion, we highlight possible reasons for this unexpected finding. First, the current implementation of the OPS method displaying simultaneous images and words during learning could have dragged the participant's attention away from the orthographic form. Second, the speed of presentation of stimuli might have been too fast to allow fast semantic retrieval. Finally, semantic learning might have a different timeframe than word form learning, and the current findings would reflect only the latter. Our results nevertheless highlight the rapid emergence of new word-form representations, captured by the EEG-FPVS approach.
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
BARILLON, Amaury ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Cognitive Science and Assessment
SCHILTZ, Christine ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Cognitive Science and Assessment
LOCHY, Aliette ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Cognitive Science and Assessment
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Tracking novel visual word learning via different methods with an original FPVS-EEG approach.
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work has been supported and funded by the Fonds National de la Recherche du Luxembourg (FNR-CORE C21/SC/16241557/READINGBRAIN).
Angwin A. J. Phua B. Copland D. A. (2014). Using semantics to enhance new word learning: an ERP investigation. Neuropsychologia 59, 169–178. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.002, PMID: 24846835
Bakker I. Takashima A. Van Hell J. G. Janzen G. McQueen J. M. (2015). Tracking lexical consolidation with ERPs: lexical and semantic-priming effects on N400 and LPC responses to newly-learned words. Neuropsychologia 79, 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.020, PMID: 26476370
Bakker-Marshall I. Takashima A. Schoffelen J. M. Van Hell J. G. Janzen G. McQueen J. M. (2018). Theta-band oscillations in the middle temporal gyrus reflect novel word consolidation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 30, 621–633. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01240, PMID: 29393716
Batterink L. J. Neville H. J. (2011). Implicit and explicit mechanisms of word learning in a narrative context: an event-related potential study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 3181–3196. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00013, PMID: 21452941
Bentin S. (1987). Event-related potentials, semantic processes, and expectancy factors in word recognition. Brain Lang. 31, 308–327. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90077-0, PMID: 3620905
Bermúdez-Margaretto B. Beltrán D. Cuetos F. Domı́nguez A. (2018). Brain signatures of new (Pseudo-) words: visual repetition in associative and non-associative contexts. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12:354. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00354
Bermúdez-Margaretto B. Beltrán D. Cuetos F. Domı́nguez A. (2019). Novel word learning: event-related brain potentials reflect pure lexical and task-related effects. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13:347. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00347
Bermúdez-Margaretto B. Beltrán D. Domı́nguez A. Cuetos F. (2015). Repeated exposure to “meaningless” pseudowords modulates LPC, but not N(FN)400. Brain Topogr. 28, 838–851. doi: 10.1007/s10548-014-0403-5
Bermúdez-Margaretto B. Shtyrov Y. Beltrán D. Cuetos F. Domı́nguez A. (2020). Rapid acquisition of novel written word-forms: ERP evidence. Behav. Brain Funct. 16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12993-020-00173-7
Borovsky A. Elman J. L. Kutas M. (2012). Once is enough: N400 indexes semantic integration of novel word meanings from a single exposure in context. Lang. Learn. Dev. 8, 278–302. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2011.614893, PMID: 23125559
Borovsky A. Kutas M. Elman J. L. (2010). Learning to use words: event-related potentials index single-shot contextual word learning. Cognition 116, 289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.004, PMID: 20621846
Bowers J. S. Davis C. J. Hanley D. A. (2005). Interfering neighbours: the impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words. Cognition 97, B45–B54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.002, PMID: 15925358
Brysbaert M. (2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. J. Mem. Lang. 109:104047. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2019.104047
Chen Q. Mirman D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychol. Rev. 119, 417–430. doi: 10.1037/a0027175, PMID: 22352357
Cohen L. Dehaene S. Naccache L. Lehéricy S. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Hénaff M. A. et al. (2000). The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain 123, 291–307. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.2.291
Cohen L. D. Lehéricy S. Chochon F. Lemer C. Rivaud S. Dehaene S. (2002). Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain 125, 1054–1069. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf094, PMID: 11960895
Coltheart M. Rastle K. Perry C. Langdon R. Ziegler J. C. (2001). DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychol. Rev. 108, 204–256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204, PMID: 11212628
Davis M. H. Gaskell M. G. (2009). A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 3773–3800. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0111, PMID: 19933145
Dehaene S. Le Clec'H G. Poline J. B. Le Bihan D. Cohen L. (2002). The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus. Neuroreport 13, 321–325. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015, PMID: 11930131
Dehaene S. Pegado F. Braga L. W. Ventura P. Filho G. N. Jobert A. et al. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 330, 1359–1364. doi: 10.1126/science.1194140, PMID: 21071632
Dehaene-Lambertz G. Monzalvo K. Dehaene S. (2018). The emergence of the visual word form: longitudinal evolution of category-specific ventral visual areas during reading acquisition. PLoS Biol. 16:e2004103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004103, PMID: 29509766
Dufau S. Grainger J. Ziegler J. C. (2012). How to say “no” to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 38, 1117–1128. doi: 10.1037/a0026948
Dumay N. Gaskell M. G. (2007). Sleep-associated changes in the mental representation of spoken words. Psychol. Sci. 18, 35–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01845.x, PMID: 17362375
Duyck W. Desmet T. Verbeke L. P. Brysbaert M. (2004). Wordgen: a tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36, 488–499. doi: 10.3758/bf03195595, PMID: 15641437
Ehri L. C. (2013). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Sci. Stud. Read. 18, 5–21. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
Fernandes T. Kolinsky R. Ventura P. (2009). The metamorphosis of the statistical segmentation output: lexicalization during artificial language learning. Cognition 112, 349–366. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.002, PMID: 19545864
Frishkoff G. A. Perfetti C. A. Collins-Thompson K. (2010). Lexical quality in the brain: ERP evidence for robust word learning from context. Dev. Neuropsychol. 35, 376–403. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2010.480915, PMID: 20614356
García-Gámez A. B. Macizo P. (2022). Lexical and semantic training to acquire words in a foreign language: an electrophysiological study. Bilingualism Lang. Cogn. 25, 768–785. doi: 10.1017/s1366728921000456
Gaskell M. G. Dumay N. (2003). Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words. Cognition 89, 105–132. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00070-2, PMID: 12915296
Geukes S. Gaskell M. G. Zwitserlood P. (2015). Stroop effects from newly learned color words: effects of memory consolidation and episodic context. Front. Psychol. 6:278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00278, PMID: 25814973
Glezer L. S. Jiang X. Luetje M. M. Napoliello E. M. Kim J. Riesenhuber M. et al. (2019). An fMRI-adaptation study of phonological and orthographic selectivity to written words in adults with poor reading skills. Brain Lang. 191, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.01.002, PMID: 30721792
Glezer L. S. Jiang X. Riesenhuber M. (2009). Evidence for highly selective neuronal tuning to whole words in the “visual word form area”. Neuron 62, 199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.017, PMID: 19409265
Glezer L. S. Kim J. Rule J. Jiang X. Riesenhuber M. (2015). Adding words to the brain's visual dictionary: novel word learning selectively sharpens orthographic representations in the VWFA. J. Neurosci. 35, 4965–4972. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4031-14.2015, PMID: 25810526
Gola-Asmussen C. Lequette C. Pouget G. Rouyer C. Zorman M. (2010). Outil d’évaluation de compétences de lecture chez l’adulte de plus de 16 ans, vol. 1. Grenoble, France: CeFoCOP/Université de Provence Aix-Marseille I–Cognisciences LSE Université Pierre Mendès.
Grainger J. Jacobs A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. Psychol. Rev. 103, 518–565. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.518, PMID: 8759046
Harm M. W. Seidenberg M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychol. Rev. 111, 662–720. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.662, PMID: 15250780
Hauk O. Marchive M. Volfart A. Schiltz C. Rossion B. Ralph M. A. L. et al. (2025). Word-selective EEG/MEG responses in the English language obtained with fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS). Imaging Neuroscience 3:imag_a_00414. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00414
Heinrich S. P. Mell D. Bach M. (2009). Frequency-domain analysis of fast oddball responses to visual stimuli: a feasibility study. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 73, 287–293. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.04.011, PMID: 19426768
Henderson L. Powell A. D. G. Gaskell M. G. Norbury C. (2014). Learning and consolidation of new spoken words in autism spectrum disorder. Dev. Sci. 17, 858–871. doi: 10.1111/desc.12169
Kapnoula E. C. McMurray B. (2016). Newly learned word forms are abstract and integrated immediately after acquisition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 23, 491–499. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0897-1, PMID: 26202702
Kapnoula E. C. Packard S. Gupta P. McMurray B. (2015). Immediate lexical integration of novel word forms. Cognition 134, 85–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.007, PMID: 25460382
Kiefer M. Brendel D. (2006). Attentional modulation of unconscious “automatic” processes: evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 184–198. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.2.184, PMID: 16494680
Kurdziel L. B. F. Spencer R. M. C. (2015). Consolidation of novel word learning in native English-speaking adults. Memory 24, 471–481. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1019889, PMID: 25768336
Kutas M. Federmeier K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 621–647. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123, PMID: 20809790
Kutas M. Hillyard S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307, 161–163. doi: 10.1038/307161a0, PMID: 6690995
Landi N. Perfetti C. A. Bolger D. J. Dunlap S. Foorman B. R. (2006). The role of discourse context in developing word form representations: a paradoxical relation between reading and learning. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 94, 114–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.12.004, PMID: 16600285
Leach L. Samuel A. G. (2007). Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: when adults learn new words. Cogn. Psychol. 55, 306–353. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.01.001, PMID: 17367775
Li H. Liang Y. Yue Q. Zhang L. Ying K. Mei L. (2021). The contributions of the left fusiform subregions to successful encoding of novel words. Brain Cogn. 148:105690. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105690, PMID: 33494036
Lindsay S. Gaskell M. G. (2013). Lexical integration of novel words without sleep. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 39, 608–622. doi: 10.1037/a0029243, PMID: 22774854
Lindsay S. Sedin L. M. Gaskell M. G. (2012). Acquiring novel words and their past tenses: evidence from lexical effects on phonetic categorisation. J. Mem. Lang. 66, 210–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.005
Liu-Shuang J. Norcia A. M. Rossion B. (2014). An objective index of individual face discrimination in the right occipito-temporal cortex by means of fast periodic oddball stimulation. Neuropsychologia 52, 57–72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.022, PMID: 24200921
Lochy A. Collette E. Rossion B. Schiltz C. (2025). Impaired neural discrimination of regular words from pseudowords in dyslexic adults as revealed by fast periodic visual stimulation. Neuropsychologia 212:109137. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109137, PMID: 40194681
Lochy A. Jacques C. Maillard L. Colnat-Coulbois S. Rossion B. Jonas J. (2018). Selective visual representation of letters and words in the left ventral occipito-temporal cortex with intracerebral recordings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E7595–E7604. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1718987115, PMID: 30038000
Lochy A. Rossion B. Ralph M. L. Volfart A. Hauk O. Schiltz C. (2024). Linguistic and attentional factors–not statistical regularities–contribute to word-selective neural responses with FPVS-oddball paradigms. Cortex 173, 339–354. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.01.007, PMID: 38479348
Lochy A. Van Belle G. Rossion B. (2015). A robust index of lexical representation in the left occipito-temporal cortex as evidenced by EEG responses to fast periodic visual stimulation. Neuropsychologia 66, 18–31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.007, PMID: 25448857
Lupker S. J. Pexman P. M. (2010). Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 36, 1267–1289. doi: 10.1037/a0020125, PMID: 20804296
Marchive M. Rossion B. Lochy A. (2025). Optimal word reading rate as evidenced by frequency-tagging electrophysiology. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 37, 988–1008. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02286, PMID: 39785667
McCandliss B. D. Cohen L. Dehaene S. (2003). The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 293–299. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00134-7, PMID: 12860187
McClelland J. L. McNaughton B. L. O'Reilly R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol. Rev. 102, 419–457. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419, PMID: 7624455
McClelland J. L. Rumelhart D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychol. Rev. 88, 375–407. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375
Mestres-Missé A. Rodrı́guez-Fornells A. Münte T. F. (2007). Watching the brain during meaning acquisition. Cereb. Cortex 17, 1858–1866. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl094
Mimeau C. Ricketts J. (2018). The role of orthographic and semantic learning in word reading and reading comprehension. Sci. Stud. Read. 22, 384–400. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1464575
Moore M. W. Durisko C. Perfetti C. A. Fiez J. A. (2014). Learning to read an alphabet of human faces produces left-lateralized training effects in the fusiform gyrus. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26, 896–913. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00506, PMID: 24168219
Morton J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychol. Rev. 76, 165–178. doi: 10.1037/h0027366
Murphy K. R. Talcott J. B. Jogia J. (2019). On the neural basis of word reading: a meta-analysis of FMRI evidence using activation likelihood estimation. J. Neurolinguistics 49, 71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.08.005
New B. Pallier C. Brysbaert M. Ferrand L. (2004). Lexique 2: a new French lexical database. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36, 516–524. doi: 10.3758/BF03195598, PMID: 15641440
Norcia A. M. Appelbaum L. G. Ales J. Cottereau B. R. Rossion B. (2015). The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: a review. J. Vis. 15:4. doi: 10.1167/15.6.4, PMID: 26024451
Ouellette G. Fraser J. (2009). What exactly is a Yait anyway: the role of semantics in orthographic learning. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 104, 239–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.05.001, PMID: 19481221
Palma P. Titone D. (2021). Something old, something new: a review of the literature on sleep-related lexicalization of novel words in adults. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 28, 96–121. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01809-5, PMID: 32939631
Partanen E. Leminen A. Cook C. Shtyrov Y. (2018). Formation of neocortical memory circuits for unattended written word forms: neuromagnetic evidence. Sci. Rep. 8:15829. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34029-y, PMID: 30361630
Perea M. Lupker S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. J. Mem. Lang. 51, 231–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.005
Perfetti C. A. (2007). Reading ability: lexical quality to comprehension. Sci. Stud. Read. 11, 357–383. doi: 10.1080/10888430701530730
Perfetti C. A. Hart L. (2008). “The lexical quality hypothesis” in Dans Studies in written language and literacy, John Benjamins Publishing Company. 189–213.
Perfetti C. A. Wlotko E. W. Hart L. (2005). Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 31, 1281–1292. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1281, PMID: 16393047
Pexman P. M. Hargreaves I. S. Siakaluk P. D. Bodner G. E. Pope J. (2008). There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15, 161–167. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.161, PMID: 18605497
Price C. J. Devlin J. T. (2011). The interactive account of ventral occipitotemporal contributions to Reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 246–253. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.001, PMID: 21549634
Pugh K. R. Mencl W. E. Jenner A. R. Katz L. Frost S. J. Lee J. R. et al. (2001). Neurobiological studies of reading and reading disability. J. Commun. Disord. 34, 479–492. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9924(01)00060-0, PMID: 11725860
Purcell J. J. Shea J. Rapp B. (2014). Beyond the visual word form area: the orthography–semantics interface in spelling and reading. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 31, 482–510. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.909399, PMID: 24833190
Qiao X. Forster K. I. (2013). Novel word lexicalization and the prime lexicality effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 39, 1064–1074. doi: 10.1037/a0030528, PMID: 23088548
Qiao X. Forster K. I. Witzel N. (2009). Is banara really a word? ☆. Cognition 113, 254–257. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.006, PMID: 19717145
Ralph M. A. L. Jefferies E. Patterson K. Rogers T. T. (2016). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 42–55. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150, PMID: 27881854
Ratcliff R. Perea M. Colangelo A. Buchanan L. (2004). A diffusion model account of normal and impaired readers. Brain Cogn. 55, 374–382. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.051, PMID: 15177817
Raymer A. M. Berndt R. S. (1996). Reading lexically without semantics: evidence from patients with probable Alzheimer's disease. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2, 340–349. doi: 10.1017/S1355617700001363, PMID: 9375183
Regan D. (1966). Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 20, 238–248. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(66)90088-5, PMID: 4160391
Regan D. (1989). “Human brain electrophysiology” in Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. NewYork: Elsevier.
Retter T. L. Jiang F. Webster M. A. Rossion B. (2018). Dissociable effects of inter-stimulus interval and presentation duration on rapid face categorization. Vis. Res. 145, 11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2018.02.009, PMID: 29581059
Retter T. L. Rossion B. (2016). Uncovering the neural magnitude and spatio-temporal dynamics of natural image categorization in a fast visual stream. Neuropsychologia 91, 9–28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.028, PMID: 27461075
Retter T. L. Rossion B. Schiltz C. (2021). Harmonic amplitude summation for frequency-tagging analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 33, 2372–2393. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01763, PMID: 34272961
Ricketts J. Bishop D. V. M. Pimperton H. Nation K. (2011). The role of self-teaching in learning orthographic and semantic aspects of new words. Sci. Stud. Read. 15, 47–70. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.536129
Riesenhuber M. Glezer L. S. (2017). Evidence for rapid localist plasticity in the ventral visual stream: the example of words. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 32, 286–294. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1210178, PMID: 29201934
Rosenthal J. L. Ehri L. C. (2008). The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 100, 175–191. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.175
Rossion B. Boremanse A. (2011). Robust sensitivity to facial identity in the right human occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by steady-state visual-evoked potentials. J. Vis. 11:16. doi: 10.1167/11.2.16, PMID: 21346000
Rossion B. Retter T. L. Liu-Shuang J. (2020). Understanding human individuation of unfamiliar faces with oddball fast periodic visual stimulation and electroencephalography. Eur. J. Neurosci. 52, 4283–4344. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14865, PMID: 32542962
Rubenstein H. Garfield L. Millikan J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 9, 487–494. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3
Schimke E. A. E. Angwin A. J. Cheng B. B. Y. Copland D. A. (2021). The effect of sleep on novel word learning in healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 28, 1811–1838. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01980-3, PMID: 34549375
Seghier M. L. Neufeld N. H. Zeidman P. Leff A. Mechelli A. Nagendran A. et al. (2012). Reading without the left ventral occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 50, 3621–3635. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.030, PMID: 23017598
Seidenberg M. S. McClelland J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychol. Rev. 96, 523–568. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523, PMID: 2798649
Share D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition 55, 151–218. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2, PMID: 7789090
Smejkalova A. Chetail F. (2024). Lexical integration of novel words learned through natural reading. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 32, 1367–1380. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02626-w, PMID: 39715991
Stothart G. Quadflieg S. Milton A. (2017). A fast and implicit measure of semantic categorisation using steady state visual evoked potentials. Neuropsychologia 102, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.025, PMID: 28552782
Szmalec A. Page M. P. Duyck W. (2012). The development of long-term lexical representations through Hebb repetition learning. J. Mem. Lang. 67, 342–354. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.07.001
Takashima A. Bakker I. Van Hell J. G. Janzen G. McQueen J. M. (2014). Richness of information about novel words influences how episodic and semantic memory networks interact during lexicalization. NeuroImage 84, 265–278. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.023, PMID: 23962957
Takashima A. Bakker I. Van Hell J. G. Janzen G. McQueen J. M. (2017). Interaction between episodic and semantic memory networks in the acquisition and consolidation of novel spoken words. Brain Lang. 167, 44–60. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.009, PMID: 27291335
Tamura N. Castles A. Nation K. (2017). Orthographic learning, fast and slow: lexical competition effects reveal the time course of word learning in developing readers. Cognition 163, 93–102. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.002, PMID: 28314178
Tao Y. Schubert T. Wiley R. Stark C. Rapp B. (2024). Cortical and subcortical mechanisms of orthographic word-form learning. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 36, 1071–1098. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02147, PMID: 38527084
Taylor J. Plunkett K. Nation K. (2011). The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: an artificial orthography paradigm. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37, 60–76. doi: 10.1037/a0020126, PMID: 20919786
Taylor J. Rastle K. Davis M. H. (2014). Distinct neural specializations for learning to read words and name objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 26, 2128–2154. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00614, PMID: 24666161
Van Petten C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Lang. Cogn. Process. 8, 485–531. doi: 10.1080/01690969308407586
Viviani E. (2019). Learning to recognize novel words and novel objects. Available online at: https://iris.sissa.it/bitstream/20.500.11767/104804/1/VivianiE_Thesis.pdf (Accessed October 6, 2025).
Volfart A. Rice G. Ralph M. A. L. Rossion B. (2021). Implicit, automatic semantic word categorisation in the left occipito-temporal cortex as revealed by fast periodic visual stimulation. NeuroImage 238:118228. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118228
Walker S. Henderson L. M. Fletcher F. E. Knowland V. C. P. Cairney S. A. Gaskell M. G. (2019). Learning to live with interfering neighbours: the influence of time of learning and level of encoding on word learning. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6:181842. doi: 10.1098/rsos.181842, PMID: 31183121
Weighall A. Henderson L. Barr D. J. Cairney S. A. Gaskell M. G. (2017). Eye-tracking the time-course of novel word learning and lexical competition in adults and children. Brain Lang. 167, 13–27. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.07.010, PMID: 27562102
Yeatman J. D. Norcia A. M. (2016). Temporal tuning of word- and face-selective cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 28, 1820–1827. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01002, PMID: 27378330