quantum entanglement; quantum correlations; entanglement distance; generalized coherent states; graph states; bosonic field theory
Abstract :
[en] Abstract
Computationally feasible multipartite entanglement measures are essential for advancing our understanding of complex quantum systems. Entanglement distance (ED), introduced by Cocchiarella
et al
(2020
Phys. Rev. A
101
042129), based on the Fubini–Study metric, offers several advantages over existing methods, including ease of computation, a profound geometrical interpretation, and applicability to multipartite entanglement. Although ED has been successfully applied to systems of qudits, an explicit formulation for continuous quantum variables, particularly for pure Gaussian states, remains unexplored. In this work, we address this limitation by deriving the analytical expression for the Gaussian entanglement measure (GEM), a multipartite entanglement monotone for multimode pure Gaussian states based on the purity of fragments of the whole system, through a generalization of ED to group-theoretic coherent states. We show the efficacy of GEM across various scenarios, including the analysis of a two-mode Gaussian state under beam-splitter and squeezing transformations, and exploring graph states involving three and four modes. Notably, comparing GEM values for states with different graph topologies reveals insights into the connectivity of the underlying graphs. Additionally, we illustrate how GEM provides insights into free bosonic field theory on
<jats:inline-formula>
<jats:tex-math>
</jats:tex-math>
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</jats:inline-formula>
beyond standard bipartite entanglement entropy, paving the way for quantum information-theoretic tools to probe the topological properties of quantum field theories.
Disciplines :
Physics
Author, co-author :
GORI, Matteo ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Physics and Materials Science (DPHYMS)
SARKIS, Matthieu ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Physics and Materials Science (DPHYMS)
TKATCHENKO, Alexandre ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Physics and Materials Science (DPHYMS)
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Multipartite Gaussian entanglement measure with applications to graph states and bosonic field theory
Publication date :
2025
Journal title :
Journal of Physics. A, Mathematical and Theoretical
Cocchiarella D Scali S Ribisi S Nardi B Bel-Hadj-Aissa G Franzosi R 2020 Entanglement distance for arbitrary M-qudit hybrid systems Phys. Rev. A 101 042129 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.042129
Arya F et al 2019 Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor Nature 574 505 10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
Wu Y et al 2021 Strong quantum computational advantage using a superconducting quantum processor Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 180501 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.180501
Ma W-L Puri S Schoelkopf R J Devoret M H Girvin S M Jiang L 2021 Quantum control of bosonic modes with superconducting circuits Sci. Bull. 66 1789 10.1016/j.scib.2021.05.024
Tebbenjohanns F Mattana M L Rossi M Frimmer M Novotny L 2021 Quantum control of a nanoparticle optically levitated in cryogenic free space Nature 595 378 10.1038/s41586-021-03617-w
Vidal G Tarrach R 1999 Robustness of entanglement Phys. Rev. A 59 141 10.1103/PhysRevA.59.141
Vidal G 2000 Entanglement monotones J. Mod. Opt. 47 355 10.1080/09500340008244048
Vedral V Plenio M B Rippin M A Knight P L 1997 Quantifying entanglement Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 2275 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2275
Horodecki M Horodecki P Horodecki R 2000 Limits for entanglement measures Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 2014 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2014
Eisert J Simon C Plenio M B 2002 On the quantification of entanglement in infinite-dimensional quantum systems Phys. A. Math. Gen. 35 3911 10.1088/0305-4470/35/17/307
Plenio M B Virmani S 2007 An introduction to entanglement measures Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 1 51 1-51 10.5555/2011706.2011707
Lancien C Di Martino S Huber M Piani M Adesso G Winter A 2016 Should entanglement measures be monogamous or faithful? Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 060501 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060501
Bennett C H DiVincenzo D P Smolin J A Wootters W K 1996 Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction Phys. Rev. A 54 3824 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824
Popescu S Rohrlich D 1997 Thermodynamics and the measure of entanglement Phys. Rev. A 56 R3319 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.R3319
Vidal G 1999 Entanglement of pure states for a single copy Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1046 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1046
Wootters W K 1998 Entanglement of formation of an arbitrary state of two qubits Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 2245 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245
Bennett C H Brassard G Popescu S Schumacher B Smolin J A Wootters W K 1996 Purification of noisy entanglement and faithful teleportation via noisy channels Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 722 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.722
Horodecki M Horodecki P Horodecki R 1998 Mixed-state entanglement and distillation: Is there a ‘bound’ entanglement in nature? Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 5239 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5239
Shimony A 1995 Degree of entanglement Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 755 675 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.tb39008.x
Dür W Vidal G Cirac J I 2000 Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways Phys. Rev. A 62 062314 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314
Briegel H J Raussendorf R 2001 Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 910 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.910
Coffman V Kundu J Wootters W K 2000 Distributed entanglement Phys. Rev. A 61 052306 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306
Yu C-s Song H-s 2005 Multipartite entanglement measure Phys. Rev. A 71 042331 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042331
Eisert J Briegel H J 2001 Schmidt measure as a tool for quantifying multiparticle entanglement Phys. Rev. A 64 022306 10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022306
Carvalho A R R Mintert F Buchleitner A 2004 Decoherence and multipartite entanglement Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 230501 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.230501
Pezzé L Smerzi A 2009 Entanglement, nonlinear dynamics and the Heisenberg limit Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 100401 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.100401
Hyllus P Laskowski W Krischek R Schwemmer C Wieczorek W Weinfurter H Pezzé L Smerzi A 2012 Fisher information and multiparticle entanglement Phys. Rev. A 85 022321 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022321
Scali S Franzosi R 2019 Entanglement estimation in non-optimal qubit states Ann. Phys. 411 167995 10.1016/j.aop.2019.167995
Vesperini A Bel-Hadj-Aissa G Franzosi R 2023 Entanglement and quantum correlation measures for quantum multipartite mixed states Sci. Rep. 13 2852 10.1038/s41598-023-29438-7
Vesperini A Bel-Hadj-Aissa G Capra L Franzosi R 2024 Unveiling the geometric meaning of quantum entanglement: discrete and continuous variable systems Front. Phys. 19 51204 10.1007/s11467-024-1403-x
Vesperini A 2023 Correlations and projective measurements in maximally entangled multipartite states Ann. Phys., NY 457 169406 10.1016/j.aop.2023.169406
Nourmandipour A Vafafard A Mortezapour A Franzosi R 2021 Entanglement protection of classically driven qubits in a lossy cavity Sci. Rep. 11 16259 10.1038/s41598-021-95623-1
Braunstein S L Van Loock P 2005 Quantum information with continuous variables Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 513 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.513
Wang X-B Hiroshima T Tomita A Hayashi M 2007 Quantum information with gaussian states, Phys. Rep. 448 1 11 1-11 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.005
Weedbrook C Pirandola S García-Patrón R Cerf N J Ralph T C Shapiro J H Lloyd S 2012 Gaussian quantum information Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 621 10.1103/RevModPhys.84.621
Adesso G Ragy S Lee A R 2014 Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond Open Syst. Inf. Dyn. 21 1440001 10.1142/S1230161214400010
Wald R M 1994 Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics University of Chicago Press
Parker L Toms D 2009 Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Fields and Gravity Cambridge University Press
Umezawa H Matsumoto H Tachiki M 1982 Thermo Field Dynamics and Condensed States North Holland
Blasone M Jizba P Vitiello G 2011 Quantum Field Theory and its Macroscopic Manifestations: Boson Condensation, Ordered Patterns and Topological Defects World Scientific
Berezin F 2012 The Method of Second Quantization vol 24 Elsevier
Guaita T Hackl L Shi T Hubig C Demler E Cirac J I 2019 Gaussian time-dependent variational principle for the Bose-Hubbard model Phys. Rev. B 100 094529 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.094529
Windt B Jahn A Eisert J Hackl L 2021 Local optimization on pure Gaussian state manifolds SciPost Phys. 10 066 10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.3.066
Cerezo M et al 2021 Variational quantum algorithms Nat. Rev. Phys. 3 625 10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9
Chen X-y 2005 Gaussian relative entropy of entanglement Phys. Rev. A 71 062320 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062320
De Palma G Hackl L 2022 Linear growth of the entanglement entropy for quadratic Hamiltonians and arbitrary initial states SciPost Phys. 12 021 10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.1.021
Adesso G Illuminati F 2005 Gaussian measures of entanglement versus negativities: ordering of two-mode Gaussian states Phys. Rev. A 72 032334 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.032334
Adesso G Serafini A Illuminati F 2006 Multipartite entanglement in three-mode gaussian states of continuous-variable systems: quantification, sharing structure and decoherence Phys. Rev. A 73 032345 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.032345
Tserkis S Ralph T C 2017 Quantifying entanglement in two-mode Gaussian states Phys. Rev. A 96 062338 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.062338
Hackl L Myers R C Circuit complexity for free fermions J. High Energy Phys. JHEP07(2018)139 10.1007/JHEP07(2018)139
Chapman S Eisert J Hackl L Heller M P Jefferson R Marrochio H Myers R 2019 Complexity and entanglement for thermofield double states SciPost Phys. 6 034 10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.3.034
Hackl L Guaita T Shi T Haegeman J Demler E Cirac I 2020 Geometry of variational methods: dynamics of closed quantum systems SciPost Phys. 9 048 10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.4.048
Hackl L Bianchi E 2021 Bosonic and fermionic Gaussian states from Kähler structures SciPost Phys. Core 4 025 10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.4.3.025
Nishioka T 2018 Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 035007 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.035007
Calabrese P Cardy J 2009 Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 504005 10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504005
Casini H Huerta M 2009 Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 504007 10.1088/1751-8113/42/50/504007
Witten E 2018 Aps medal for exceptional achievement in research: invited article on entanglement properties of quantum field theory Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 045003 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.045003
Hollands S Sanders K 2017 Entanglement measures and their properties in quantum field theory (arXiv: 1702.04924)
Rangamani M Takayanagi T Holographic Entanglement Entropy vol 931 Springer (arXiv: 1609.01287)
Tóth G 2012 Multipartite entanglement and high-precision metrology Phys. Rev. A 85 022322 10.1103/PhysRevA.85.022322
Pezzè L Smerzi A 2014 Quantum Theory of Phase Estimation (Atom Interferometry) IOS Press pp 691 741 pp 691-741
Hauke P Heyl M Tagliacozzo L Zoller P 2016 Measuring multipartite entanglement through dynamic susceptibilities Nat. Phys. 12 778 10.1038/nphys3700
Rajabpour M 2017 Multipartite entanglement and quantum Fisher information in conformal field theories Phys. Rev. D 96 126007 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.126007
Paris M G A Illuminati F Serafini A De Siena S 2003 Purity of Gaussian states: measurement schemes and time evolution in noisy channels Phys. Rev. A 68 012314 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.012314
Facchi P Florio G Parisi G Pascazio S 2008 Maximally multipartite entangled states Phys. Rev. A 77 060304 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.060304
Facchi P Florio G Lupo C Mancini S Pascazio S 2009 Gaussian maximally multipartite-entangled states Phys. Rev. A 80 062311 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.062311
Sen A Sen U 2010 Channel capacities versus entanglement measures in multiparty quantum states Phys. Rev. A 81 012308 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.012308
Roy S Das T Sen A 2020 Computable genuine multimode entanglement measure: Gaussian versus non-Gaussian Phys. Rev. A 102 012421 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.012421
Ma Z-H Chen Z-H Chen J-L Spengler C Gabriel A Huber M 2011 Measure of genuine multipar-tite entanglement with computable lower bounds Phys. Rev. A 83 062325 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.062325
Xie S Younis D Mei Y Eberly J H 2024 Multipartite entanglement: a journey through geometry Entropy 26 217 10.3390/e26030217
Demkowicz-Dobrzański R Buchleitner A Kuś M Mintert F 2006 Evaluable multipartite entanglement measures: multipartite concurrences as entanglement monotones Phys. Rev. A 74 052303 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.052303
Horodecki R Horodecki P Horodecki M Horodecki K 2009 Quantum entanglement Rev. Mod. Phys. 81 865 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
Andersson E Öhberg P 2014 Quantum Information and Coherence Springer
Scott A J 2004 Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correcting codes and entangling power of quantum evolutions Phys. Rev. A 69 052330 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052330
Wolf M M Giedke G Krüger O Werner R F Cirac J I 2004 Gaussian entanglement of formation Phys. Rev. A 69 052320 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052320
Hill S A Wootters W K 1997 Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 5022 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5022
Marian P Marian T A Scutaru H 2003 Bures distance as a measure of entanglement for two-mode squeezed thermal states Phys. Rev. A 68 062309 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062309
Marian P Marian T A 2008 Entanglement of formation for an arbitrary two-mode Gaussian state Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 220403 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.220403
Tserkis S Onoe S Ralph T C 2019 Quantifying entanglement of formation for two-mode Gaussian states: analytical expressions for upper and lower bounds and numerical estimation of its exact value Phys. Rev. A 99 052337 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.052337
Plenio M B 2005 Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 090503 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.090503
Serafini A 2017 Quantum Continuous Variables: a Primer of Theoretical Methods CRC Press
Serafini A Dahlsten O Gross D Plenio M 2007 Canonical and micro-canonical typical entanglement of continuous variable systems J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 40 9551 10.1088/1751-8113/40/31/027
Fukuda M Koenig R 2019 Typical entanglement for Gaussian states J. Math. Phys. 60 112203060304 10.1063/1.5119950
Blaizot J-P Ripka G 1986 Quantum theory of finite systems
Bengtsson I Życzkowski K 2017 Geometry of Quantum States: an Introduction to Quantum Entanglement Cambridge University Press
Chabaud U Markham D Grosshans F 2020 Stellar representation of non-Gaussian quantum states Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 063605 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.063605
Guaita T Hackl L Shi T Demler E Cirac J I 2021 Generalization of group-theoretic coherent states for variational calculations Phys. Rev. Res. 3 023090 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023090
Rahman M Geiger D 2016 Quantum clustering and Gaussian mixtures (arXiv: 1612.09199)