Keywords :
Fourier spectrum analysis; harmonic frequencies; rhythmic visual stimulus; steady-state; stimulation rate; visual evoked potentials; Humans; Male; Female; Adult; Electroencephalography; Young Adult; Photic Stimulation/methods; Brain/physiology; Visual Perception/physiology; Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology; Brain; Evoked Potentials, Visual; Photic Stimulation; Visual Perception; Neuroscience (all)
Abstract :
[en] In frequency tagging, visual stimulation at a frequency (F) of ∼10 Hz has long been known to generate the highest-amplitude response at F in the frequency domain over the human occipital cortex with electroencephalogram and other high temporal-resolution methods. Brain responses are indeed commonly assessed simply at F (i.e., the first harmonic = 1F), under the assumption that the response is represented at a single frequency, i.e., "steady-state" or approximately sinusoidal in terms of amplitude over time. This condition is met at stimulus presentation frequencies above ∼4-8 Hz in the visual modality; consequently, frequency tagging has often been limited to F above this "floor." Here, we support a less-common perspective, that frequency-tagged responses do not need to be steady-state, such that slower F are valid. In this case, it has been shown that is not appropriate to measure nonsinusoidal responses at only F but that nonsinusoidal responses can still be analyzed simply and advantageously in the frequency domain through baseline-corrected amplitude summation across harmonics (F + 2F + 3F… = F s). Critically, we demonstrate that although the highest-amplitude F response occurs at F = 10 Hz, the highest-amplitude F s response occurs at approximately F < 4 Hz. We use this example toward understanding the effect of stimulation frequency on response amplitude and discuss its caveats and limitations. We address what defines an "optimal" stimulation frequency (note: it may not always be the F yielding the highest-amplitude response) and reflect on considerations when choosing a stimulation frequency in different contexts.
Title :
Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency.
Funding text :
This work was supported by the SNAMath INTER project (INTER/FNRS/ 17/1178524 to C.S.) funded by the Luxembourgish Fund for Scientific Research (FNR, Luxembourg; https:// www.fnr.lu/); and a postdoc fellowship from the Lorraine Universit\u00E9 d\u2019Excellence (LUE; https://www.univ- lorraine.fr/lue/ to T.L.R.). We thank Bruno Rossion (https:// facecategorization-lab.webnode.page/), members of the UL Cognitive Neuroscience Group (https://eeglabcns. wixsite.com/schiltzlab), anonymous reviewers, and reviewing editor Ifat Levy for providing comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. We also thank all contributers to
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0