Measuring the classroom level of the Dynamic Model of Educational Effectiveness through teacher self-report: development and validation of a new instrument
DIERENDONCK, Christophe ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Education and Social Work (DESW) > Lifelong Learning and Guidance
Co-auteurs externes :
no
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Measuring the classroom level of the Dynamic Model of Educational Effectiveness through teacher self-report: development and validation of a new instrument
Ainley J. Carstens R. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Conceptual Framework, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 187, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: 10.1787/799337c2-en
Anderson J. C. Gerbing D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103, 411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Asparouhov T. (2005). Sampling weights in latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 411–434. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1203_4
Asparouhov T. Muthén B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct. Equ. Model. 16, 397–438. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008204
Asparouhov T. Muthen B. Morin A. J. S. (2015). Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances. J. Manag. 41, 1561–1577. doi: 10.1177/0149206315591075
Azigwe J. B. Kyriakides L. Panayiotou A. Creemers B. P. M. (2016). The impact of effective teaching characteristics in promoting student achievement in Ghana. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 51, 51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.07.004
Bonifay W. Lane S. P. Reise S. P. (2017). Three concerns with applying a bifactor model as a structure of psychopathology. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 5, 184–186. doi: 10.1177/2167702616657069
Brown C. Malin J. (2022). The emerald handbook of evidence-informed practice in education. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Charalambous C. Y. Litke E. (2018). Studying instructional quality by using a content-specific lens: the case of the mathematical quality of instruction framework. ZDM 50, 445–460. doi: 10.1007/s11858-018-0913-9
Charalambous C. Praetorius A.-K. (2023). “Theorizing teaching: synthesizing expert opinion to identify the next steps” in Theorizing teaching: Current status and open issues. eds. Praetorius A.-K. Charalambous C. (Cham: Springer).
Chen F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834
Cheung G. W. Rensvold R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct. Equ. Model. 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Clausen M. (2002). Qualität von Unterricht: Eine Frage der Perspektive? [Quality of instruction as a question of perspective?]. Waxmann.
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Edn. Oxfordshire: Erlbaum.
Creemers B. Kyriakides L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice, and theory in contemporary schools. Routledge.
Creemers B. Kyriakides L. (2012). Improving quality in education. Dynamic approaches to school improvement. Routledge.
Desimone L. M. Smith T. M. Frisvold D. E. (2010). Survey measures of classroom instruction: comparing student and teacher reports. Educ. Policy 24, 267–329. doi: 10.1177/0895904808330173
DeVellis R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dimosthenous A. Kyriakides L. Panayiotou A. (2020). Short- and long-term effects of the home learning environment and teachers on student achievement in mathematics: a longitudinal study. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 31, 50–79. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2019.1642212
Fauth B. Göllner R. Lenske G. Praetorius A. K. Wagner W. (2020). Who sees what? Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 66, 138–155.
Finney S. J. DiStefano C. (2013). “Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling” in Structural equation modeling: A second course. eds. Hancock G. R. Mueller R. O.. 2nd ed (Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing), 439–492.
Göllner R. Fauth B. Wagner W. (2021). “Student ratings of teaching quality dimensions: empirical findings and future directions”, in Student feedback on teaching in schools. eds. Rollett W. Bijlsma H. Röhl S. (Switzerland, AG: Springer).
Hu L.-T. Bentler P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. Multidiscip. J. 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Klieme E. Pauli C. Reusser K. (2009). “The pythagoras study: investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms” in The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. eds. Janik T. Seider T. (Munster: Waxmann), 137–160.
Koziol S. M. Burns P. (1986). Teachers’ accuracy in self-reporting about instructional practices using a focused self-report inventory. J. Educ. Res. 79, 205–209. doi: 10.1080/00220671.1986.10885678
Kraft M. A. Gilmour A. F. (2017). Revisiting the widget effect: teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educ. Res. 46, 234–249. doi: 10.3102/0013189X17718797
Kyriakides L. Archambault I. Janosz M. (2013). Searching for stages of effective teaching: a study testing the validity of the dynamic model in Canada. J. Classr. Interact. 48, 11–24.
Kyriakides L. Creemers B. Panatyiotou A. (2012). Report of the data analysis of the student questionnaire used to measure teacher factors: Across and within country results. Available at: https://websites.ucy.ac.cy/esf/documents/Analysis_of_Data/Analysis_of_Student_Questionnaire/D12b_Report_student_questionnaire_analysis.pdf (Accessed 5 July 2023).
Kyriakides L. Creemers B. Panayiotou A. (2018). Using educational effectiveness research to promote quality of teaching: the contribution of the dynamic model. ZDM 50, 381–393. doi: 10.1007/s11858-018-0919-3
Kyriakides L. Creemers B. Panayiotou A. Charalambous E. (2020). Quality and equity in education. Revisiting theory and research on educational effectiveness and improvement. ProQuest Ebook Central.
Kyriakides L. Panayiotou A. (2023). “Using educational effectiveness research for promoting quality of teaching: the dynamic approach to teacher and school improvement” in Effective teaching around the world. eds. Maulana R. Helms-Lorenz M. Klassen R. M. (Cham: Springer).
Lazarides R. Schiefele U. (2021). The relative strength of relations between different facets of teacher motivation and core dimensions of teaching quality in mathematics. Learn. Instr. 76:101489. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101489
Levin B. (2011). Mobilising research knowledge in education. Lond. Rev. Educ. 9, 15–26. doi: 10.1080/14748460.2011.550431
Little O. Goe L. Bell C. (2009). A practical guide to evaluating teacher effectiveness. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
Morin A. J. S. Arens A. K. Marsh H. W. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Struct. Equ. Model. 23, 116–139. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
Morin A. J. S. Myers N. D. Lee S. (2020). “Modern factor analytic techniques: Bifactor models, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) and bifactor-ESEM” in Handbook of sport psychology. eds. Tenenbaum G. Eklund R. C.. 4th ed (Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley), 1044–1073.
Muthén L. K. Muthén B. O. (2012-2019). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (8.3). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
OECD (2003). New challenges for educational research, Knowledge Management, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2007). Evidence in education: Linking research and policy, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Panayiotou A. Kyriakides L. Creemers B. P. M. McMahon L. Vanlaar G. Pfeifer M. et al. (2014). Teacher behavior and student outcomes: results of a European study. Educ. Assess. Eval. Account. 26, 73–93. doi: 10.1007/s11092-013-9182-x
Perreira T. A. Morin A. J. Hebert M. Gillet N. Houle S. A. Berta W. (2018). The short form of the workplace affective commitment multidimensional questionnaire (WACMQ-S): a bifactor-ESEM approach among healthcare professionals. J. Vocat. Behav. 106, 62–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2017.12.004
Reddy L. A. Dudek C. M. (2014). Teacher progress monitoring of instructional and behavioral management practices: an evidence-based approach to improving classroom practices. Int. J. Sch. Educ. Psychol. 2, 71–84. doi: 10.1080/21683603.2013.876951
Reddy L. A. Dudek C. M. Fabiano G. A. Peters S. (2015). Measuring teacher self-report on classroom practices: construct validity and reliability of the classroom strategies scale-teacher form. Sch. Psychol. Q. 30, 513–533. doi: 10.1037/spq0000110, PMID: 25622226
Reddy L. A. Hua A. N. Dudek C. M. Kettler R. Arnold-Berkovits I. Lekwa A. et al. (2021). The relationship between school administrator and teacher ratings of classroom practices and student achievement in high-poverty schools. Assess. Eff. Interv. 46, 87–98. doi: 10.1177/1534508419862863
Reise S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of Bifactor measurement models. Multivar. Behav. Res. 47, 667–696. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715555, PMID: 24049214
Reise S. P. Bonifay W. E. Haviland M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. J. Pers. Assess. 95, 129–140. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
Rodriguez A. Reise S. P. Haviland M. G. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. J. Pers. Assess. 98, 223–237. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249, PMID: 26514921
Roy A. Guay F. Valois P. (2013). Teaching to address diverse learning needs: development and validation of a differentiated instruction scale. Int. J. Incl. Educ. 17, 1186–1204. doi: 10.1080/13603116.2012.743604
Sánchez-Cabrero R. Estrada-Chichón J. L. Abad-Mancheño A. Mañoso-Pacheco L. (2021). Models on teaching effectiveness in current scientific literature. Educ. Sci. 11:409. doi: 10.3390/educsci11080409
Scheerens J. (2016). Educational effectiveness and ineffectiveness: A critical review of the Knowledge Base. Dordrecht: Springer.
Seidel T. Shavelson R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Rev. Educ. Res. 77, 454–499. doi: 10.3102/0034654307310317
Senden B. Nilsen T. Blömeke S. (2021). “Instructional quality: a review of conceptualizations, measurement approaches, and research findings” in Ways of analyzing teaching quality. eds. Blikstad-Balas M. Klette K. Tengberg M.. Red ed (Scandinavian University Press), 140–172.
Teodorović J. Milin V. Bodroža B. Ivana D. Derić I. D. Vujačić M. et al. (2022). Testing the dynamic model of educational effectiveness: the impact of teacher factors on interest and achievement in mathematics and biology in Serbia. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 33, 51–85. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2021.1942076
Van de Vijver F. He J. (2014). Report on social desirability, midpoint and extreme responding in TALIS 2013. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 107. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Vanlaar G. Kyriakides L. Panayiotou A. Vandecandelaere M. McMahon L. De Fraine B. et al. (2016). Do the teacher and school factors of the dynamic model affect high- and low-achieving student groups to the same extent? A cross-country study. Res. Pap. Educ. 31, 183–211. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2015.1027724
Wagner W. Göllner R. Werth S. Voss T. Schmitz B. Trautwein U. (2016). Student and teacher ratings of instructional quality: consistency of ratings over time, agreement, and predictive power. J. Educ. Psychol. 108, 705–721. doi: 10.1037/edu0000075
Wiggs N. B. Reddy L. A. Kettler R. Hua A. Dudek C. Lekwa A. et al. (2023). Convergence between teacher self-report and school administrator observation ratings using the classroom strategies assessment system. Assess. Eff. Interv. 48, 113–123. doi: 10.1177/15345084221112858
