Physics-informed neural network; Discrete element method; Continuum approach; Biomass source; Particle-fluid problem
Résumé :
[en] The motion of particles in the moving grate combustion chamber is used as the case study. These problems are categorized as particle-fluid problems. They are typically solved using Lagrangian-Eulerian methods, one of which is the coupling between the discrete element method (DEM, which is applied to the particles phase) and the computational fluid dynamics method (CFD, which is applied to the fluid phase). The current study's objective is to avoid coupling and instead, focusing on using the CFD method only. There are dense piles of particles moving on the grates in the biomass combustion chamber. We assumed the dense particles' behaviors similar to the fluid, and then, applied the fluid governing equations to the particles phase. The virtual fields of the velocities, pressure and density are specified for the particles' phase. Afterward, the physics-informed neural network (PINN) is used to reconstruct particles' fields and additionally to investigate the capability of the predicted fields to satisfy the fluid governing equations. This model has the benefit of reconstructing the particles' fields without the need for boundaries and initial conditions. The precision of the model is assessed by comparing the test data set with the exact data obtained from the eXtended discrete element method (XDEM is an in-house software). It is demonstrated that the trained neural network delivered high accuracy and is capable of predicting all outputs with an error value of less than 2 percent. Additionally, to choose the optimum architecture for the neural network, the effect of the number of hidden layers and neurons is studied.
Disciplines :
Ingénierie mécanique
Auteur, co-auteur :
DARLIK, Fateme ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
PETERS, Bernhard ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
Co-auteurs externes :
no
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Reconstruct the biomass particles fields in the particle-fluid problem using continuum methods by applying the physics-informed neural network
Date de publication/diffusion :
2023
Titre du périodique :
Results in Engineering
Maison d'édition :
Elsevier
Volume/Tome :
17
Pagination :
100917
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Focus Area :
Computational Sciences
Projet FnR :
FNR12252781 - Data-driven Computational Modelling And Applications, 2017 (01/09/2018-28/02/2025) - Andreas Zilian
Bauer, N., Rose, S.K., Fujimori, S., Van Vuuren, D.P., Weyant, J., Wise, M., Cui, Y., Daioglou, V., Gidden, M.J., Kato, E., et al. Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the emf-33 model comparison. Clim. Change 163:3 (2020), 1553–1568.
Barroso, G., Roth, S., Nussbaumer, T., Investigation of biomass conversion on a moving grate by pyrolysis gas analysis and fuel bed modelling. Energy 174 (2019), 897–910.
Husin, H., Faisal, M., Gani, A., Mamat, R., Combustion efficiency in a fluidized-bed combustor with a modified perforated plate for air distribution. Processes, 9(9), 2021, 1489.
Nunes, L.J., Biomass gasification as an industrial process with effective proof-of-concept: a comprehensive review on technologies, processes and future developments. Results Eng., 2022, 100408.
Boafo-Mensah, G., Darkwa, K.M., Laryea, G., Effect of combustion chamber material on the performance of an improved biomass cookstove. Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 21, 2020, 100688.
Xia, Z., Long, J., Yan, S., Bai, L., Du, H., Chen, C., Two-fluid simulation of moving grate waste incinerator: comparison of 2d and 3d bed models. Energy, 216, 2021, 119257.
Zhang, J., Computational fluid dynamics (cfd) modeling for biomass and wate to energy production., 2021.
Baker, M.C., Kong, B., Capecelatro, J., Desjardins, O., Fox, R.O., Direct comparison of Eulerian–Eulerian and Eulerian–Lagrangian simulations for particle-laden vertical channel flow. AIChE J., 66(7), 2020, e16230.
Tavakkol, S., Zirwes, T., Denev, J.A., Jamshidi, F., Weber, N., Bockhorn, H., Trimis, D., An Eulerian-Lagrangian method for wet biomass carbonization in rotary kiln reactors. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 139, 2021, 110582.
Yu, Y., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Zhou, Q., A model to improve granular temperature in cfd-dem simulations. Energies, 13(18), 2020, 4730.
Tanui, J., Kioni, P.N., Mirre, T., Nowitzki, M., Todorova, D., Application of cfd-dem method in modeling of wood combustion in a fixed bed., 2020.
Yao, L., Xiao, Z., Liu, J., Zhang, Q., Wang, M., An optimized cfd-dem method for fluid-particle coupling dynamics analysis. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 174, 2020, 105503.
Alexiadis, A., Simmons, M., Stamatopoulos, K., Batchelor, H., Moulitsas, I., The duality between particle methods and artificial neural networks. Sci. Rep. 10:1 (2020), 1–7.
Inazumi, S., Intui, S., Jotisankasa, A., Chaiprakaikeow, S., Kojima, K., Artificial intelligence system for supporting soil classification. Results Eng., 8, 2020, 100188.
Zhong, H., Xiong, Q., Yin, L., Zhang, J., Zhu, Y., Liang, S., Niu, B., Zhang, X., Cfd-based reduced-order modeling of fluidized-bed biomass fast pyrolysis using artificial neural network. Renew. Energy 152 (2020), 613–626.
Neelam, R., Kulkarni, S.A., Bharath, H., Powar, S., Doddamani, M., Mechanical response of additively manufactured foam: a machine learning approach. Results Eng., 16, 2022, 100801.
Korkerd, K., Soanuch, C., Gidaspow, D., Piumsomboon, P., Chalermsinsuwan, B., Artificial neural network model for predicting minimum fluidization velocity and maximum pressure drop of gas fluidized bed with different particle size distributions. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 37 (2021), 61–73.
Baruah, D., Baruah, D., Hazarika, M., Artificial neural network based modeling of biomass gasification in fixed bed downdraft gasifiers. Biomass Bioenergy 98 (2017), 264–271.
Veza, I., Panchal, H., Paristiawan, P.A., Idris, M., Fattah, I.R., Putra, N.R., Silambarasan, R., et al. Improved prediction accuracy of biomass heating value using proximate analysis with various ann training algorithms. Results Eng., 16, 2022, 100688.
Vadyala, S.R., Betgeri, S.N., Matthews, J.C., Matthews, E., A review of physics-based machine learning in civil engineering. Results Eng., 2021, 100316.
Raissi, M., Wang, Z., Triantafyllou, M.S., Karniadakis, G.E., Deep learning of vortex-induced vibrations. J. Fluid Mech. 861 (2019), 119–137.
Huzni, S., Ibrahim, I.B., Fonna, S., Pidaparti, R., Physics-based surrogate model for reinforced concrete corrosion simulation. Results Eng., 16, 2022, 100659.
McGowan, E., Gawade, V., Guo, W., A physics-informed convolutional neural network with custom loss functions for porosity prediction in laser metal deposition. Sensors, 22(2), 2022, 494.
Zhu, Q., Liu, Z., Yan, J., Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networks. Comput. Mech. 67:2 (2021), 619–635.
Pang, H., Wu, L., Liu, J., Liu, X., Liu, K., Physics-informed neural network approach for heat generation rate estimation of lithium-ion battery under various driving conditions. J. Energy Chem., 2022.
Buoso, S., Joyce, T., Kozerke, S., Personalising left-ventricular biophysical models of the heart using parametric physics-informed neural networks. Med. Image Anal., 71, 2021, 102066.
Onate, E., Rojek, J., Combination of discrete element and finite element methods for dynamic analysis of geomechanics problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 193:27–29 (2004), 3087–3128.
O'Sullivan, C., Bray, J.D., Selecting a suitable time step for discrete element simulations that use the central difference time integration scheme. Eng. Comput., 2004.
Peters, B., Rousset, A., Besseron, X., Mainassara Chekaraou, A.W., Gallo, M.G., Sansone, F., Lupi, A., Galleti, C., Process analysis in thermal process engineering with high-performance computing using the example of grate firing. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Industrial Furnaces and Boilers, 2020.
Peters, B., The extended discrete element method (xdem) for multi-physics applications. Sch. J. Eng. Res., 2013.
Peters, B., Besseron, X., Estupinan, A., Mahmoudi, A., Mohseni, M., A discrete/continuous numerical approach to multi-physics. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48:1 (2015), 645–650.
Qi, F., de Richter, S.K., Jenny, M., Peters, B., Dem simulation of dense granular flows in a vane shear cell: kinematics and rheological laws. Powder Technol. 366 (2020), 722–735.
Bui, V.H., Bui, M.D., Rutschmann, P., Combination of discrete element method and artificial neural network for predicting porosity of gravel-bed river. Water, 11(7), 2019, 1461.
Vaferi, B., Samimi, F., Pakgohar, E., Mowla, D., Artificial neural network approach for prediction of thermal behavior of nanofluids flowing through circular tubes. Powder Technol. 267 (2014), 1–10.
Henkes, A., Wessels, H., Mahnken, R., Physics informed neural networks for continuum micromechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 393, 2022, 114790.
Rezaei, S., Harandi, A., Moeineddin, A., Xu, B.-X., Reese, S., A mixed formulation for physics-informed neural networks as a potential solver for engineering problems in heterogeneous domains: comparison with finite element method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 401, 2022, 115616.
Baydin, A.G., Pearlmutter, B.A., Radul, A.A., Siskind, J.M., Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18 (2018), 1–43.
Kingma, D.P., Ba Adam, J., A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
Fletcher, L., Katkovnik, V., Steffens, F., Engelbrecht, A., Optimizing the number of hidden nodes ofateme.darlikf a feedforward artificial neural network. 1998 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No. 98CH36227), vol. 2, 1998, IEEE, 1608–1612.
