| Reference : Types of health-related behaviours: a cluster analysis of the Luxembourgish HBSC data |
| Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Unpublished conference | |||
| Human health sciences : Public health, health care sciences & services | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/47291 | |||
| Types of health-related behaviours: a cluster analysis of the Luxembourgish HBSC data | |
| English | |
Heinz, Andreas [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Social Sciences (DSOC) >] | |
Willems, Helmut Erich [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >] | |
van Duin, Claire [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Social Sciences (DSOC) >] | |
Catunda, Carolina [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Social Sciences (DSOC) >] | |
Residori, Caroline [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Social Sciences (DSOC) >] | |
| Jun-2021 | |
| Yes | |
| No | |
| International | |
| HBSC Spring Meeting 2021 | |
| 10-11 June 2021 | |
| HBSC International Coordinating Centre | |
| [en] HBSC ; health behaviour ; hierarchical cluster analysis ; substance use ; risk behaviour ; physical activity | |
| [en] Background: Although it is known that health behaviours, socio-demographic variables and outcomes correlate, it is rarely investigated if there are typical patterns of these variables among the research subjects.
Objectives: To find out whether the students can be divided into distinct groups based on their health behaviour and whether these groups differ in other ways (outcomes and socio-demographics). Method: In step 1, a hierarchical cluster analysis was carried out to determine the number of groups and to identify the cluster centres. In step 2, this information was entered as the initial values of a cluster centre analysis. In step 3, the clusters were characterised using additional variables. Results: The 8065 students surveyed could be divided into 5 distinct groups based on their data on smoking, drinking, soft drinks, exercising, fighting and bullying, with cluster 1 and cluster 5 representing the strongest contrast. Cluster 1 comprises students whose health behaviour is generally positive. It is the largest cluster with 49.5% of students. Cluster 5 comprises students whose behaviour is consistently negative. It is the smallest cluster with 7.1% of students. Students in cluster 2 are close to average on many variables, but their dental health is problematic because they frequently consume soft drinks and rarely brush their teeth. Students in cluster 3 are physically inactive, their mental health is poor, but they are also rarely injured. The students in cluster 4 stand out because of their aggressive behaviour. Conclusion: With the help of cluster analysis, it is possible to categorise the students into a small number of groups based on their health behaviour. These groups are coherent in terms of health behaviour, many outcome variables and socio-demographic variables. | |
| Researchers | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/47291 |
There is no file associated with this reference.
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.