Reference : BIM-Based End-of-Lifecycle Decision Making and Digital Deconstruction: Literature Review
Scientific journals : Article
Engineering, computing & technology : Civil engineering
Sustainable Development
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/42888
BIM-Based End-of-Lifecycle Decision Making and Digital Deconstruction: Literature Review
English
Akbarieh, Arghavan mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit >]
Jayasinghe, Laddu Bhagya mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit >]
Waldmann, Danièle mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit >]
Teferle, Felix Norman mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit >]
28-Mar-2020
Sustainability
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
12
7
Recent Progresses and New Strategies on Recycled Materials and Reused Components for Sustainable Civil Infrastructures
2670
Yes
International
[en] Building Information Modelling ; Deconstruction ; Design for Deconstruction ; Reusable Materials ; Interoperability ; Life Cycle Assessment ; Offsite Construction ; Construction and Demolition Waste ; Digital Twin ; Building Stock 4.0
[en] This article is the second part of a two-part study, which explored the extent to which Building Information Modelling (BIM) is used for End-of-Lifecycle (EoL) scenario selection to minimise the Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW). The conventional literature review presented here is based on the conceptual landscape that was obtained from the bibliometric and scientometric analysis in the first part of the study. Seven main academic research directions concerning the BIM-based EoL domain were found, including social and cultural factors, BIM-based Design for Deconstruction (DfD), BIM-based deconstruction, BIM-based EoL within LCA, BIM-aided waste management, Material and Component Banks (M/C Banks), off-site construction, interoperability and Industry Foundation Classes (IFC). The analysis highlights research gaps in the path of raw materials to reusable materials, i.e., from the deconstruction to M/C banks to DfD-based designs and then again to deconstruction. BIM-based EoL is suffering from a lack of a global framework. The existing solutions are based on local waste management policies and case-specific sustainability criteria selection. Another drawback of these ad hoc but well-developed BIM-based EoL prototypes is their use of specific proprietary BIM tools to support their framework. This disconnection between BIM tools and EoL tools is reportedly hindering the BIM-based EoL, while no IFC classes support the EoL phase information exchange.
Investissement pour la Croissance et l’emploi (2017-02-015-15)
Eco-construction for Sustainable Development (ECON4SD )
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/42888
10.3390/su12072670
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2670

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Sustainability-12-02670-BIM-based EoL and Digital Deconstruction.pdfPublisher postprint9.24 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.