“There Was No Green Tick”: Discovering the Functions of a Widget in a Joint Problem-Solving Activity and the Consequences for the Participants’ Discovering Process
SUNNEN, Patrick; AREND, Béatrice; Maquil, Valérie
2018 • In Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2 (4), p. 1-23
[en] In recent years, tangible user interfaces (TUI) have gained in popularity in educational contexts, among others to implement problem-solving and discovery learning science activities. In the context of an interdisciplinary and cross-institutional collaboration, we conducted a multimodal EMCA-based video user study involving a TUI-mediated bicycle mechanics simulation. This article focusses on the discovering work of a group of three students with regard to a particular tangible object (a red button), designed to support participants engagement with the underlying physics aspects and its consequences with regard to their engagement with the targeted mechanics aspects.
SUNNEN, Patrick ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
AREND, Béatrice ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
Maquil, Valérie; Luxembourg Institute of Science & Technology - LIST > IT for Innovative Services Department (ITIS)
Co-auteurs externes :
no
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
“There Was No Green Tick”: Discovering the Functions of a Widget in a Joint Problem-Solving Activity and the Consequences for the Participants’ Discovering Process
De Raffaele, C.; Smith, S.; Gemikonakli, O.; Nygaard, C. The Application of Tangible User Interfaces for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. In Innovative Teaching and Learning in Higher Education; Hayes, S., Hørsted, A., Eds.; Libri Publishing: Faringdon, UK, 2017; pp. 215–226. ISBN 9781911450085.
Plass, J.L.; Schwartz, R.N. Multimedia Learning with Simulations and Microworlds. In The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning; Mayer, R.E., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 729–761. ISBN 9781107610316.
De Jong, T. Computer Simulations. Technology Advances in Inquiry Learning. Science 2006, 312, 532–533. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sunnen, P.; Arend, B.; Maquil, V. “Okay, yes it’s true”—Doing discovering work in a tangible-user-interface-mediated joint problem solving physics activity. In EDULEARN17, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education and New Technologies, Barcelona, Spain, 3–5 July 2017; IATED: Valencia, Spain, 2017; pp. 8057–8068.
RE-ENGAGE Research Project Website. Available online: http://www.reengage-learning.eu (accessed on 12 September 2018).
Sacks, H.; Schegloff, E.A.; Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking in conversation. Language 1974, 5, 596–735.s
Garfinkel, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1967.
Peräkylä, A. Conversation Analysis. In Qualitative Research Practice; Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J.F., Silverman, D., Eds.; Sage: London, UK, 2006; pp. 153–167.
Mondada, L. The Conversation Analytic Approach to Data Collection. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, Sidnell, J., Stivers, T., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 32–56. ISBN 9781118941294.
Koschmann, T.; Zemel, A. Optical pulsars and black arrows: Discoveries as occasioned productions. J. Learn. Sci. 2009, 18, 200–246. [CrossRef]
Koschmann, T.; Zemel, A. ‘So that’s the ureter.’ The Informal Logic of Discovering Work. Ethnogr. Stud. 2011, 12, 31–46.
Pontual Falcão, T.; Price, S. Interfering and resolving: How tabletop interaction facilitates co-construction of argumentative knowledge. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 2011, 6, 539–559. [CrossRef]
Rogers, Y.; Sharp, H.; Preece, J. Interaction Design. Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2011; ISBN 9780470665763.
Zaman, B.; Vanden Abeele, V.; Markopoulos, P.; Marshall, P. Editorial: The evolving field of tangible interaction for children: The challenge of empirical validation. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2012, 16, 367–378. [CrossRef]
Fernaeus, Y.; Tholander, J.; Jonsson, M. Towards a new set of ideals: Consequences of the practice turn in tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, New York, NY, USA, 18–20 February 2008; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 223–230.
Scott, S.D.; Sheelagh, M.; Carpendale, T.; Inkpen, K.M. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chicago, IL, USA, 6–10 November 2004; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 294–303.
Rogers, Y.; Lim, Y.; Hazlewood, W.R.; Marshall, P. Equal opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single users displays? Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2009, 24, 79–116. [CrossRef]
Edwards, L.D. The Design and Analysis of a Mathematical Microworld. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 1995, 12, 77–94. [CrossRef]
Maquil, V.; Tobias, E.; Anastasiou, D.; Mayer, H.; Latour, T. COPSE: Rapidly Instantiating Problem Solving Activities based on Tangible Tabletop Interfaces. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2017, 1, 16. [CrossRef]
Maquil, V.; Latour, T. TULIP: A widget-based software framework for tangible tabletop interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems, Duisburg, Germany, 23–26 June 2015; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 216–221.
Jonassen, D.H. Supporting Problem Solving in PBL. Interdiscipl. J. Probl.-Based Learn. 2011, 5, 95–112. [CrossRef]
De Jong, T.; Van Joolingen, W.R. Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Rev. Educ. Res. 1998, 68, 179–202. [CrossRef]
Atkinson, P.; Delamont, S. Mock-ups and Cock-ups: The Stage-Management of Guided Discovery Instruction. In School Experience. Explorations in the Sociology of Education; Woods, P., Hammersley, M., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2017.
Dewey, J. The Theory of Inquiry; Holt: New York, NY, USA, 1938.
Bruner, J. The Act of Discovery. Harv. Educ. Rev. 1961, 31, 21–32.
Neber, H. Discovery Learning. In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning; Seel, N., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012; pp. 1009–1012. ISBN 9781441955036.
Seedhouse, P. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2004; ISBN 9781405120098.
Leonard, D.C. Learning Theories: A to Z; Greenwood Pub Group: Westport, CT, USA, 2002; ISBN 9781573564137.
Koschmann, T. Discovery as an Interactional Matter. Available online: https://wwwen.uni.lu/flshase/actualites/discovery_as_an_interactional_matter (accessed on 13 August 2018).
Koschmann, T.; Zemel, A. Optical Pulsars and Black Arrows: Discovery’s Work in ‘Hot’ and ‘Cold’ Science. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2006), Bloomington, IN, USA, 27 June–1 July 2006; ISLS: Bloomington, IN, USA, 2006; pp. 356–362.
Streeck, J.; Goodwin, C.; LeBaron, C. Embodied Interaction in the Material World: An Introduction. In Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World; Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., LeBaron, C., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2011; pp. 1–26. ISBN 9781107630420.
Arend, B.; Sunnen, P.; Fixmer, P.; Sujbert, M. Perspectives do matter—Expanding Multimodal Interaction Analysis with Joint Screen. Classr. Discourse 2014, 5, 38–50. [CrossRef]
Psathas, G. Conversation Analysis. The Study of Talk-in-Interaction; Sage: London, UK, 1995; ISBN 0803957475.
Garfinkel, H. Ethnomethodology’s Program. Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism; Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MD, USA, 2002; ISBN 9780752516427.
Gardner, R. Conversation Analysis in the Classroom. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis; Sidnell, J., Stivers, T., Eds.; Wiley Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 593–611.
Waring, H.Z. Theorizing Pedagogical Interaction. Insights from Conversation Analysis; Routledge: London, UK, 2016; ISBN 9781138086104.
Stevens, R. Learning as a member’s phenomenon. Natl. Soc. Stud. Educ. 2010, 109, 82–97.
Koschmann, T. Conversation Analysis and Learning in Interaction. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics; Chapelle, C.A., Ed.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2013; 6p. [CrossRef]
Koschmann, T.; Zemel, A.; Neumeister, M. “Case n’ Point”: Discovering Learning in the Nonce. In Learning and Becoming in Practice, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Boulder, CO, USA, 23–27 June 2014; Polman, J.L., Kyza, E.A., O’Neill, D.K., Tabak, T., Penuel, W.R., Jurow, A.S., O’Connor, K., Lee, T., D’Amico, L., Eds.; ISLS: Boulder, CO, USA, 2014; pp. 551–557.
Melander, H. Trajectories of Learning. Embodied Interaction in Change; Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis: Uppsala, Sweden, 2009; ISBN 978–91-554-7525-3.
Pallotti, G.; Wagner, J. (Eds.) L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives; University of Hawai’i: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2011; ISBN 9780980045970.
Macbeth, D. Understanding understanding as an instructional matter. J. Pragmat. 2011, 43, 438–451. [CrossRef]
Stahl, G. Ethnomethodologically informed. Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn. 2012, 7, 1–10. [CrossRef]
Hester, S.; Francis, D. An Invitation to Ethnomethodology. Language, Society and Interaction; Sage: London, UK, 2004; ISBN 9780761966425.
Liddicoat, A.J. An Introduction to Conversation Analysis, 2nd ed.; Continuum: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 9781441189349.
Hutchby, I.; Wooffitt, R. Conversation Analysis, 2nd ed.; Polity Press: Cambridge, UK, 2008; ISBN 9780745638669.
Heritage, J. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Structures of Social Action; Atkinson, M., Heritage, J., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1984; pp. 299–345. ISBN 9780521318624.
Koshik, I. Beyond Rhetorical Questions: Assertive Questions in Everyday Interaction; John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2005; ISBN 9781588116321.
Bruxelles, S.; Traverso, V. Usage de la particule voilà dans une réunion de travail: Analyse multimodale. In Les Marqueurs Discursifs dans Les Langues Romanes; Drecher, M., Frank-Job, B., Eds.; Peter Lang: Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 2006; pp. 71–92. ISBN 9783631534151.
Hornecker, E. Beyond Affordance: Tangibles’ Hybrid Nature. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, Kingston, ON, Canada, 19–22 February 2012; pp. 175–182.
Ishii, I. Tangible bits: Beyond pixels. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Intreaction (TEI ’08), Bonn, Germany, 18–20 February 2008.
Antle, A.N.; Wise, A.F. Getting down to details: Using theories of cognition and learning to inform tangible user interface design. Interact. Comput. 2013, 25, 1–20. [CrossRef]
Stanton, D.; Bayon, V.; Neale, H.; Ghali, A.; Benford, S.; Cobb, S.; Ingram, R.; O’Malley, C.; Wilson, J.; Pridmore, T. Classroom collaboration in the design of tangible interfaces for storytelling. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA, USA, 31 March–5 April 2001; pp. 482–489.
