landuse; population density; radial analysis; scaling law; Zipf
Résumé :
[en] The size and form of cities influence their social and environmental impacts. Whether cities have the same form irrespective of their size is still an open question. We analyse the profile of artificial land and population density, with respect to the distance to their main centre, for the 300 largest European cities. Our analysis combines the GMES/Copernicus Urban Atlas 2006 land use database at 5 m resolution for 300 larger urban zones with more than 100,000 inhabitants and the Geostat population grid at 1 km resolution. We find a remarkable constancy of radial profiles across city sizes. Artificial land profiles scale in the two horizontal dimensions with the square root of city population, while population density profiles scale in three dimensions with its cube root. In short, cities of different size are homothetic in terms of land use and population density, which challenges the idea that larger cities are more parsimonious in the use of land per capita. While earlier literature documented the scaling of average densities (total surface and population) with city size, we document the scaling of the whole radial distance profile with city size, thus liaising intra-urban radial analysis and systems of cities. Our findings also yield homogenous spatial definitions of cities, from which we can re-question urban scaling laws and Zipf’s law for cities.
Disciplines :
Geographie humaine & démographie
Auteur, co-auteur :
LEMOY, Rémi ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE)
CARUSO, Geoffrey ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE) ; Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research - LISER
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Evidence for the homothetic scaling of urban forms
Date de publication/diffusion :
novembre 2018
Titre du périodique :
Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science
ISSN :
2399-8083
eISSN :
2399-8091
Maison d'édition :
Sage Publications Ltd., London, Royaume-Uni
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Focus Area :
Sustainable Development
Projet FnR :
FNR9143220 - Systematic Land Use Calibration Of Alonso-based Urban Models On European Cities, 2014 (01/09/2015-31/08/2017) - Rémi Maurice Lemoy
Ahlfeldt GM, (2011) If Alonso was right: Modeling accessibility and explaining the residential land gradient. Journal of Regional Science 51(2): 318–338.
Alonso W, (1964) Location and Land Use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Arcaute E, Hatna E, Ferguson P, et al. (2015) Constructing cities, deconstructing scaling laws. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 12(102): 20140745.
Batty M, (2013) The New Science of Cities. MIT Press.
Batty M, Ferguson P, et al. (2011) Defining city size. Environment and Planning B 38(5): 753–756.
Bettencourt LM, (2013) The origins of scaling in cities. Science 340(6139): 1438–1441.
Bettencourt LM, Lobo J, (2016) Urban scaling in Europe. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 13(116): 20160005.
Bettencourt LM, Lobo J, Helbing D, et al. (2007) Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(17): 7301–7306.
Bretagnolle A, Pumain D, Vacchiani-Marcuzzo C, (2007) Les formes des systèmes de villes dans le monde. In: Mattei M-F PD (ed) Données urbaines, Villes. Vol. 5. Antrhopos-Economica, pp. 301–314.
Clark C, (1951) Urban population densities. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 114(4): 490–496.
Delloye J, Lemoy R and Caruso G (2018) Alonso and the scaling of urban profiles. arXiv:1801.07512. 23 Jan 2018, 37p. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.07512.
Eeckhout J, (2004) Gibrat’s law for (all) cities. The American Economic Review 94(5): 1429–1451.
Favaro JM, Pumain D, (2011) Gibrat revisited: An urban growth model incorporating spatial interaction and innovation cycles. Geographical Analysis 43: 261–286.
Fujita M, (1989) Urban Economic Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Gabaix X, (1999) Zipf’s law and the growth of cities. American Economic Review 89(2): 129–132.
Gabaix X, Ioannides Y, (2004) The evolution of city size distributions. In: Henderson V, Thisse JF, (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Vol.4. North-Holland, pp. 2341–2378.
Guérois M, Pumain D, (2008) Built-up encroachment and the urban field: a comparison of forty European cities. Environment and Planning A 40(9): 2186–2203.
Nordbeck S, (1971) Urban allometric growth. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 53(1): 54–67.
Openshaw S, (1983) The modifiable areal unit problem, CATMOG 38. In: Geo Abstracts, Norwich.
Pumain D, (2004) Scaling Laws and Urban Systems. SFI Working Paper 2004-02-002, Santa Fe Institute, Santa-Fe, NM, USA.
Rozenfeld HD, Rybski D, Andrade JS, et al. (2008) Laws of population growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(48): 18702–18707.
Rozenfeld HD, Rybski D, Gabaix X, et al. (2009) The area and population of cities: New insights from a different perspective on cities. NBER working paper no. 15409.
Rozenfeld HD, Rybski D, Gabaix X, et al. (2011) The area and population of cities: New insights from a different perspective on cities. The American Economic Review 101(5): 2205–2225.
Schläpfer M, Lee J, Bettencourt L, (2015) Urban skylines: Building heights and shapes as measures of city size. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.00946.
Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR, (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(40): 16083–16088.
Shalizi CR, (2011) Scaling and Hierarchy in Urban Economies. arXiv:1102.4101v2. 8 Apr 2011, 15p. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1102.4101v2.
Thisse JF, (2014) The new science of cities by Michael Batty: The opinion of an economist. Journal of Economic Literature 52(3): 805–819.
Tobler WR, (1969) Satellite confirmation of settlement size coefficients. Area 1(3): 30–34.
UNPD (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision.
Von Thünen JH, (1875) Der isolirte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie. Vol. 1. Wiegant, Hempel & Parey.
Walker K, (2016) Locating neighbourhood diversity in the American metropolis. Urban Studies 55: 116–132.
Wilson SG, (2012) Patterns of metropolitan and micropolitan population change: 2000 to 2010. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.