| Reference : "Rationale Trennung" oder "Marriage d'Amour"? Zum Verhältnis von Geschichte und Philo... |
| Scientific journals : Article | |||
| Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Multidisciplinary, general & others | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/21408 | |||
| "Rationale Trennung" oder "Marriage d'Amour"? Zum Verhältnis von Geschichte und Philosophie in der Erziehungswissenschaft | |
| German | |
Priem, Karin  [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS) >] | |
| Fendler, Lynn [] | |
| 2015 | |
| Zeitschrift für Pädagogik | |
| Julius Beltz | |
| 5 | |
| Yes (verified by ORBilu) | |
| International | |
| 0044-3247 | |
| Weinheim | |
| Germany | |
| [en] The contribution serves as an example of enabling permeability between philosophy
and history within the frame work of educational science. It deals with the epistemological, material, political, and categorical conditions, some of which initiate a separation of historical science from philosophy, whereas others allow, on the one hand, for history to profit from philosophy and, on the other, for philosophy to profit from history. It is shown how much is to be gained by both philosophy and historical science through reciprocal openness within educational science. A greater integration of philosophical thought into education history and vice versa may draw attention to blind spots on both sides, to unchallenged methodological archetypes and seemingly unavoidable mental dispositions, the reflection of which may contribute to an enrichment of educational research. | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/21408 |
| File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
|
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.
