| Reference : Time perception, estimation paradigm, and temporal relevance. |
| Scientific journals : Article | |||
| Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Education & instruction | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/6673 | |||
| Time perception, estimation paradigm, and temporal relevance. | |
| English | |
Klapproth, Florian  [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Languages, Culture, Media and Identities (LCMI) >] | |
| 2007 | |
| Perceptual and Motor Skills | |
| Dr CH and Dr RB Ammons | |
| 104 | |
| 749-757 | |
| Yes (verified by ORBilu) | |
| International | |
| 0031-5125 | |
| Missoula | |
| MT | |
| [en] 52 women and 20 men (M age = 25.3 yr., SD = 4.1) reproduced one of three durations (15, 30, and 45 sec.) of a uniform visual stimulus in either a prospective or a retrospective estimation paradigm. In contrast to the prospective conditions, the participants in the retrospective conditions did not know that time estimation would be required subsequently. However, temporal relevance in the retrospective conditions was raised explicitly by instructing the participants to wait for the termination of a visual stimulus and to press a button immediately after the stimulus had disappeared. The results contrasted with most findings of comparisons between prospective and retrospective duration judgments: there were no differences between the conditions regarding their mean estimates. However, intersubject variability of temporal judgments was higher in the retrospective conditions than in the prospective conditions. The results were interpreted within the framework of attentional models of temporal information processing. | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/6673 | |
| 10.2466/pms.104.3.749-757 |
There is no file associated with this reference.
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.
