Abstract :
[en] Juridification has been widely examined in national contexts across various societal sectors, yet its expansion and institutionalization in international settings, particularly within international organizations, remain underexplored. This paper contributes to the juridification through rights literature by analyzing a non-exhaustive set of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law on higher education (n = 25). We introduce the 4-E framework – expansion, entanglement, elaboration, and effects – to examine the judicialization of higher education under European human rights case law. Using a mixed-methods approach combining case law, social network, and policy analyses, we demonstrate how: (a) expansion manifests through the increasing role of human rights claims in higher education; (b) entanglement highlights the interconnectedness of multiple rights, shaping judicial interpretations; (c) elaboration occurs as legal precedents refine and consolidate legal standards over time; and (d) effects capture the impact of ECtHR rulings on legal norm diffusion, agenda setting, and institutional and national policies. Our findings underscore the role of the ECtHR in regulating higher education through human rights law, contributing to both juridification studies and the broader legal and policy discourse on European higher education governance. This study also suggests future research directions on the evolving intersection of law, education, and supranational judicial oversight.
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0