Campbell, B.M., et al. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc., 22, 2017, 8.
Busch, J., Ferretti-Gallon, K., What drives deforestation and what stops it? A meta-analysis. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 11 (2017), 3–23.
Seppelt, R., et al. Synchronized peak-rate years of global resources use. Ecol. Soc., 19, 2014, 50.
Pradhan, P., et al. Closing yield gaps: how sustainable can we be?. PLoS ONE, 10, 2015, e0129487.
Mauser, W., et al. Global biomass production potentials exceed expected future demand without the need for cropland expansion. Nat. Commun., 6, 2015, 8946.
Balmford, A., et al. Land for food and land for nature?. Daedalus 144 (2015), 57–75.
Beckmann, M., et al. Conventional land-use intensification reduces species richness and increases production: a global meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25 (2019), 1941–1956.
Newbold, T., et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520 (2015), 45–50.
Díaz, S., et al. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 2019, Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Secretariat.
Tscharntke, T., et al. Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification. Biol. Conserv. 151 (2012), 53–59.
Springmann, M., et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562 (2018), 519–525.
Klein, A.-M., et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274 (2007), 303–313.
Lechenet, M., et al. Reducing pesticide use while preserving crop productivity and profitability on arable farms. Nat. Plants 3 (2017), 1–6.
Kovács-Hostyánszki, A., et al. Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination. Ecol. Lett. 20 (2017), 673–689.
Karp, D.S., et al. Crop pests and predators exhibit inconsistent responses to surrounding landscape composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115 (2018), E7863–E7870.
Therond, O., et al. A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 37, 2017, 21.
HLPE, Agroecological and Other Innovative Approaches for Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems That Enhance Food Security and Nutrition. 2019, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Tuck, S.L., et al. Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity: a hierarchical meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 51 (2014), 746–755.
Bommarco, R., et al. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28 (2013), 230–238.
Garnett, T., et al. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341 (2013), 33–34.
Hertel, T.W., et al. Global market integration increases likelihood that a future African green revolution could increase crop land use and CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), 13799–13804.
Fischer, J., et al. Land sparing versus land sharing: moving forward. Conserv. Lett. 7 (2014), 149–157.
Salliou, N., et al. Governance of ecosystem services in agroecology: when coordination is needed but difficult to achieve. Sustainability, 11, 2019, 1158.
Hautier, Y., et al. Local loss and spatial homogenization of plant diversity reduce ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2 (2018), 50–56.
Martin, E.A., et al. The interplay of landscape composition and configuration: new pathways to manage functional biodiversity and agroecosystem services across Europe. Ecol. Lett. 22 (2019), 1083–1094.
Levers, C., et al. Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe. Reg. Environ. Chang. 18 (2018), 715–732.
Václavík, T., et al. Mapping global land system archetypes. Glob. Environ. Chang. 23 (2013), 1637–1647.
van Asselen, S., Verburg, P.H., A land system representation for global assessments and land-use modeling. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18 (2012), 3125–3148.
Hudson, L.N., et al. The database of the PREDICTS (projecting responses of ecological diversity in changing terrestrial systems) project. Ecol. Evol. 7 (2016), 145–188.
Hallmann, C.A., et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE, 12, 2017, e0185809.
Seibold, S., et al. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574 (2019), 671–674.
Emmerson, M., et al. How agricultural intensification affects biodiversity and ecosystem services. Adv. Ecol. Res. 55 (2016), 43–97.
Kleijn, D., et al. Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34 (2019), 154–166.
Jiang, J., et al. Predicting tipping points in mutualistic networks through dimension reduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115 (2018), E639–E647.
Wilby, A., Thomas, M.B., Natural enemy diversity and pest control: patterns of pest emergence with agricultural intensification. Ecol. Lett. 5 (2002), 353–360.
Gossner, M.M., et al. Land-use intensification causes multitrophic homogenization of grassland communities. Nature 540 (2016), 266–269.
Tscharntke, T., et al. When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control – five hypotheses. Biol. Conserv. 204 (2016), 449–458.
Perović, D.J., et al. Managing biological control services through multi-trophic trait interactions: review and guidelines for implementation at local and landscape scales: multi-trophic traits and multi-scale filters. Biol. Rev. 93 (2018), 306–321.
Fuglie, K., et al. G20 MACS White Paper: Metrics of Sustainable Agricultural Productivity. 2016, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Fuglie, K., R&D capital, R&D spillovers, and productivity growth in world agriculture. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 40 (2018), 421–444.
Lynam, J.K., Herdt, R.W., Sense and sustainability: sustainability as an objective in international agricultural research. Agric. Econ. 3 (1989), 381–398.
Coomes, O.T., et al. Leveraging total factor productivity growth for sustainable and resilient farming. Nat. Sustain. 2 (2019), 22–28.
Gollop, F., Swinand, G.P., Total resource productivity. Accounting for changing environmental quality. Hulten, C.R., et al. (eds.) New Developments in Productivity Analysis, 2001, University of Chicago Press, 587–608.
Ahmed, A.U., et al. Impacts of Bt Brinjal (Eggplant) Technology in Bangladesh. 2019, International Food Policy Research Institute.
Nickel, R., Polansek, T., Battle of the beans: Monsanto faces a fight for soy market. 2018, Reuters Business News 24 January 2018. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-pesticides-soybeans-insight/battle-of-the-beans-monsanto-faces-a-fight-for-soy-market-idUSKBN1FD0G2.
Ehui, S.K., Spencer, D.S.C., Measuring the sustainability and economic viability of tropical farming systems: a model from sub-Saharan Africa. Agric. Econ. 9 (1993), 279–296.
Kremen, C., Merenlender, A.M., Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science, 362, 2018, eaau6020.
Li, C., et al. Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nat. Plants 6 (2020), 653–660.
Schaphoff, S., et al. LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land – part 1: model description. Geosci. Model Dev. 11 (2018), 1343–1375.
Kuussaari, M., et al. Extinction debt: a challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24 (2009), 564–571.
Priess, J.A., et al. Linking deforestation scenarios to pollination services and economic returns in coffee agroforestry systems. Ecol. Appl. 17 (2007), 407–417.
Dominik, C., et al. Landscape composition, configuration, and trophic interactions shape arthropod communities in rice agroecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 55 (2018), 2461–2472.
Dainese, M., et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Sci. Adv., 5, 2019, eaax0121.
Garibaldi, L.A., et al. Mutually beneficial pollinator diversity and crop yield outcomes in small and large farms. Science 351 (2016), 388–391.
Losey, J.E., Vaughan, M., The economic value of ecological services provided by insects. BioScience, 56, 2006, 311.
Snyder, W.E., Give predators a complement: conserving natural enemy biodiversity to improve biocontrol. Biol. Control 135 (2019), 73–82.
Rusch, A., et al. Agricultural landscape simplification reduces natural pest control: a quantitative synthesis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 221 (2016), 198–204.
Pretty, J., Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science, 362, 2018, eaav0294.
Heisey, P.W., Fuglie, K.O., Agricultural Research Investment and Policy Reform in High-Income Countries. 2018, United States Department of Agriculture.
Grassini, P., et al. Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends. Nat. Commun., 4, 2013, 2918.
Pe'er, G., et al. Adding some green to the greening: improving the EU's ecological focus areas for biodiversity and farmers: evaluation of EU's ecological focus areas. Conserv. Lett. 10 (2017), 517–530.
Mueller, N.D., et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490 (2012), 254–257.
Graham, L.J., et al. Incorporating fine-scale environmental heterogeneity into broad-extent models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10 (2019), 767–778.
Steffan-Dewenter, I., et al. Pollination, seed set and seed predation on a landscape scale. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 268 (2001), 1685–1690.
Steffan-Dewenter, I., et al. Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83 (2002), 1421–1432.
Hass, A.L., et al. Landscape configurational heterogeneity by small-scale agriculture, not crop diversity, maintains pollinators and plant reproduction in Western Europe. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 285, 2018, 20172242.
Lautenbach, S., et al. Spatial and temporal trends of global pollination benefit. PLoS ONE, 7, 2012, e35954.
Eilers, E.J., et al. Contribution of pollinator-mediated crops to nutrients in the human food supply. PLoS ONE, 6, 2011, e21363.
Bauer, D.M., Sue Wing, I., The macroeconomic cost of catastrophic pollinator declines. Ecol. Econ. 126 (2016), 1–13.
Garibaldi, L.A., et al. Trait matching of flower visitors and crops predicts fruit set better than trait diversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 52 (2015), 1436–1444.
