CHATWISE “ChatGPT: As a High School Academic Tool for Writing, Innovation, Skills, and Education”

NOUZRI, Sana; Elfatimi, Meryem; CUBA, Antonia

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0_8

Download

Paper published in a book (Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings)

CHATWISE “ChatGPT: As a High School Academic Tool for Writing, Innovation, Skills, and Education”

NOUZRI, Sana; Elfatimi, Meryem; CUBA, Antonia

2024 • In General Aspects of Applying Generative AI in Higher Education

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10993/64853

DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0_8

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Chatwise.pdf

Author postprint (1.99 MB)

Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

NLP; LLM; ChatGPT; Prompt Engineering; Robot; Digital Face; High School Classroom; Personalized Learning; Education

Abstract :

[en] This chapter refers to the PSP-Classic project, that is CHATWISE, to explore the role of ChatGPT in education. Yet, being the most famous among educational researchers, studies on its ethical and responsible use as a digital aid in high school settings have been explored not so much. ChatGPT is evaluated regarding the ways students apply it to classroom activities and their views on it for coding and writing tasks. ChatGPT become a student tool, that presents educators with the challenge of finding the right assistance balance and simultaneously warning of potential over-reliance. This necessitates viewing ChatGPT as a supporting mechanism rather than the key fixture of education. Outreach initiatives aimed to ensure safe, responsible, and ethical behavior while using ChatGPT. Focusing on solid prompt creation and a communal platform that unites students and teachers around the topic of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in personalized learning, which emphasizes the mutual feedback and discussion on the opportunities that arise from AI applications. The project study created avenues for students to share how much they’ve learned on this digital aid, canvassed the possibility of ChatGPT being the future of learning and teaching, examined its potential for personalized education, and whether it would create more opportunities or pose challenges. Key challenges are about using ChatGPT as a helper without messing up academic integrity or replacing actual learning. Results indicate that students have confidence in ChatGPT’s capabilities yet they also have misconceptions about the technology, which may result in the need for further educational strategies to increase AI awareness. Additional results reveal that when students value the information capacity of ChatGPT, they face challenges in creating effective prompts and trusting its accuracy. Therefore, the necessary inclusion of AI literacy and critical assessment skills in education settings is essential.

Disciplines :

Computer science

Author, co-author :

NOUZRI, Sana ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Computer Science (DCS)

Elfatimi, Meryem

CUBA, Antonia ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Computer Science (DCS)

External co-authors :

yes

Language :

English

Title :

CHATWISE “ChatGPT: As a High School Academic Tool for Writing, Innovation, Skills, and Education”

Publication date :

September 2024

Event name :

International Symposium on Generative AI and Education

Event date :

15/05/2024

By request :

Yes

Main work title :

General Aspects of Applying Generative AI in Higher Education

Publisher :

Springer Nature Switzerland

ISBN/EAN :

978-3-03-165691-0
978-3-03-165690-3

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Additional URL :

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-65691-0_8

Available on ORBilu :

since 02 May 2025

Statistics

Number of views

77 (2 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

90 (2 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

OpenAI: ChatGTP: Optimizing language models for dialogue. (2022, Nov 30). https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/
https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-ai- writing- college- student-es says/672371/
Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should academics worry? Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022- 04397- 7
https://www.fnr.lu/
Forum. Schools of the future: Defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revo lution. (2020).
Shemshack, A., & Spector, J. M. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learn ing terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7, 1-20.
Costa, R. S., Tan, Q., Pivot, F., Zhang, X., & Wang, H. (2021). Personalized and adaptive learning: Educational practice and technological impact. Texto Livre, 14(3), e33445. https://doi.org/10.35699/1983-3652.2021.33445
Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024). Using an adaptive learning tool to improve student performance and satisfaction in online and face-to-face education for a more personalized approach. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 6.
The Power of Our Adaptive 3.0 Learning Platform, Fulcrum Labs. (2024). https://www.ful crumlabs.ai/adaptive-learning- 3- 0/
Cavanagh, T., Chen, B., Lahcen, R. A. M., & Paradiso, J. R. (2020). Constructing a design framework and pedagogical approach for adaptive learning in higher education: A practitio ner’s perspective. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21, 173-197.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22.
Taylor, D. L., Yeung, M., & Bashet, A. Z. (2021). Personalized and adaptive learning. Innovative learning environments in STEM higher education: Opportunities, challenges, and looking forward (pp. 17-34).
Jing, Y., Zhao, L., Zhu, K., Wang, H., Wang, C., & Xia, Q. (2023). Research landscape of adap tive learning in education: A bibliometric study on research publications from 2000 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(4), 3115.
Feng, S., Magana, A. J., & Kao, D. (2021, Oct). A systematic review of literature on the effec tiveness of intelligent tutoring systems in STEM. In 2021 IEEE frontiers in education confer ence (fie) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
El Fazazi, H., Elgarej, M., Qbadou, M., & Mansouri, K. (2021). Design of an adaptive e-learning system based on multi-agent approach and reinforcement learning. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 11, 6637-6644.
Lin, C. C., Huang, A. Y., & Lu, O. H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 41.
Shpolianskaya, I., & Seredkina, T. (2020). Intelligent support system for personalized online learning. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 11, 29-35.
Athota, L., Shukla, V. K., Pandey, N., & Rana, A. (2020). Chatbot for healthcare system using artificial intelligence. In 2020 8th international conference on reliability, infocom technologies and optimization (trends and future directions) (ICRITO) (pp. 619-622). IEEE.
Landim, A., Pereira, A., Vieira, T., de Costa, B. E., Moura, J., Wanick, V., & Bazaki, E. (2022). Chatbot design approaches for fashion e-commerce: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 15, 200-210.
Ngai, E. W., Lee, M. C., Luo, M., Chan, P. S., & Liang, T. (2021). An intelligent knowledge-based chatbot for customer service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 50, 101098.
Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet?-a systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 654924.
Yin, J., Goh, T. T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2021). Conversation technology with micro-learning: The impact of chatbot-based learning on students’ learning motivation and perfor mance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59, 154-177.
Lee, D., & Yeo, S. (2022). Developing an ai-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics. Computers & Education, 191, 104646.
Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., et al. (2023). Students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023- 00434- 1
Labadze, L., Grigolia, M., & Machaidze, L. (2023). Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023- 00426- 1
Elbanna, S., & Armstrong, L. (2024). Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: Adapting for the future. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review, 3(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-03- 2023- 0016
ROS Robots. (2023). What is QTrobot?. https://robots.ros.org/qtrobot/
robotsguide.com. QTrobot, Robots, by IEEE Spectrum. (2023). https://robotsguide.com/robots/qtrobot
Raddawi, K. (2019). QTrobot enhances learning opportunities for chil-dren with autism, Medgadget. https://www.medgadget.com/2019/02/qtrobot-enhances- learning- opportunities- for-children- with- autism.html
Luxembourg National Research Fund. (2021). From lab to startup: LuxAI and QTrobot—a robot to help children with autism, Luxembourg National Research Fund website. https://www.fnr.lu/research-with- impact- fnr- highlight/from- lab- to- startup- luxai/
GPT-4 API general availability and deprecation of older models in the Completions API. (2023). https://openai.com/blog/gpt-4- api- general- availability
Soul machine, https://www.soulmachines.com/
Gardner, M. (1970). “The fantastic combinations of John Conway’s new solitaire game ‘life’” (PDF). Mathematical games. Scientific American, 223(4), 120-123. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1070-120. JSTOR 24927642. Archived (PDF) from the origi nal on 2022-10-09.
Berlekamp, E. R., Conway, J. H., & Guy, R. K. (2001-2004). Winning Ways for your Mathematical Plays (2nd ed.). A K Peters Ltd..
Izhikevich, E. M., Conway, J. H., & Seth, A. Game of Life. Scholarpedia, 10(6), 1816. Bibcode:2015SchpJ..10.1816I. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.1816. ISSN 1941-6016 (2015-06-21).
Eurostat. (2019). https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/isoc_sks_itsps/default/table?lang=en. Accessed 13.5.2021.