One size does not fit all: Sustainable innovation, climate policy, and startups' growth aspirations

[en] Prior research suggests that the growth aspirations of startups are critical to their success. Meanwhile, as concerns about our natural environment and social injustices grow, sustainable innovations from startups seeking to address these issues become more urgent. Thus far, however, previous research has paid little attention to how the successful introduction of sustainable innovations affects the development of startups, in particular, in the form of their resulting growth aspirations. In this study, we empirically explore the relationship between sustainable innovation and startups' growth aspirations, and, drawing on institutional theory, how climate policy moderates this relationship. By investigating a sample of 1430 startups from 32 countries from the Flash Eurobarometer, we find that startups that have introduced a sustainable innovation in the past 12 months have higher growth aspirations. Additionally, our results show that stronger climate policy negatively moderates this relationship. Our findings offer a set of concrete implications for research and practice.

Disciplines :

General management, entrepreneurship & organizational theory

Author, co-author :

HIRSCHMANN, Mirko ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and New Technology (EINT)

External co-authors :

yes

Language :

English

Title :

One size does not fit all: Sustainable innovation, climate policy, and startups' growth aspirations

Publication date :

03 March 2025

Journal title :

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

ISSN :

0040-1625

eISSN :

1873-5509

Publisher :

Elsevier, New York, United States - New York

Volume :

215

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Focus Area :

Entrepreneurship and Innovation / Audit

Additional URL :

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525001003?dgcid=author

Available on ORBilu :

since 05 March 2025

Statistics

Number of views

153 (4 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Abdesselam, R., Kedjar, M., Renou-Maissant, P., What are the drivers of eco-innovation? Empirical evidence from French start-ups. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 198, 2024, 122953.
Acs, Z.J., Szerb, L., Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Bus. Econ. 28 (2007), 109–122.
Afeltra, G., Alerasoul, S.A., Strozzi, F., The evolution of sustainable innovation: from the past to the future. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 26 (2023), 386–421.
Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Green innovation and financial performance: an institutional approach. Organ. Environ. 26 (2013), 365–385.
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R.K., Culpepper, S.A., Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. J. Manag. 39 (2013), 1490–1528.
Åhman, M., Nilsson, L.J., Johansson, B., Global climate policy and deep decarbonization of energy-intensive industries. Clim. Policy 17 (2017), 634–649.
Aidis, R., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: a comparative perspective. J. Bus. Ventur. 23 (2008), 656–672.
Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., Zipperer, V., Environmental policies and productivity growth: evidence across industries and firms. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 81 (2017), 209–226.
Ambec, S., Lanoie, P., Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 22 (2008), 45–62.
Andries, P., Daou, A., Verheyden, L., Innovation as a vehicle for improving socially vulnerable groups’ access to basic provisions: a research note on the development of a questionnaire module. Res. Policy 48 (2019), 281–288.
Appel, I., Farre-Mensa, J., Simintzi, E., Patent trolls and startup employment. J. Financ. Econ. 133 (2019), 708–725.
Ardito, L., The influence of firm digitalization on sustainable innovation performance and the moderating role of corporate sustainability practices: an empirical investigation. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 32 (2023), 5252–5272.
Arfi, W.B., Hikkerova, L., Sahut, J.M., External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 129 (2018), 210–220.
Arroyabe, M.F., Arranz, C.F., De Arroyabe, I.F., de Arroyabe, J.C.F., Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: a study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment. Technol. Soc., 102733, 2024.
Audretsch, D.B., Innovation, growth and survival. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 13 (1995), 441–457.
Autio, E., Acs, Z., Intellectual property protection and the formation of entrepreneurial growth aspirations. Strateg. Entrep. J. 4 (2010), 234–251.
Avelar, S., Borges-Tiago, T., Almeida, A., Tiago, F., Confluence of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and digitalization in SMEs. J. Bus. Res., 170, 2024, 114346.
Banerjee, A.V., Duflo, E., The experimental approach to development economics. Annu. Rev. Econ. 1 (2009), 151–178.
Baron, D.P., Theories of strategic nonmarket participation: majority-rule and executive institutions. J. Econ. Manag. Strateg. 10 (2001), 47–89.
Bauer, R., Ruof, T., Smeets, P., Get real! Individuals prefer more sustainable investments. Rev. Financ. Stud. 34 (2021), 3976–4043.
Baumol, W.J., Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: existence and bounds. J. Bus. Ventur. 8 (1993), 197–210.
Bergset, L., Fichter, K., Green start-ups–a new typology for sustainable entrepreneurship and innovation research. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 3 (2015), 118–144.
Bernauer, T., Böhmelt, T., National climate policies in international comparison: the climate change cooperation index. Environ. Sci. Policy 25 (2013), 196–206.
Bingler, J.A., Kraus, M., Leippold, M., Webersinke, N., How cheap talk in climate disclosures relates to climate initiatives, corporate emissions, and reputation risk. J. Bank. Financ., 164, 2024, 107191.
Blank, S., Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harv. Bus. Rev. 91 (2013), 63–72.
Block, J.H., Fisch, C.O., Lau, J., Obschonka, M., Presse, A., How do labor market institutions influence the preference to work in family firms? A multilevel analysis across 40 countries. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 43:6 (2019), 1067–1093.
Block, J.H., Hirschmann, M., Fisch, C., Which criteria matter when impact investors screen social enterprises?. Finance, 66, 2021, 101813.
Block, J., Lambrecht, D., Willeke, T., Cucculelli, M., Meloni, D., Green patents and green trademarks as indicators of green innovation. Res. Policy, 54, 2025, 105138.
Bolton, P., Kacperczyk, M., Global pricing of carbon-transition risk. J. Financ. 78 (2023), 3677–3754.
Bos-Brouwers, H.E.J., Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 19 (2010), 417–435.
Boudreaux, C.J., Nikolaev, B.N., Klein, P., Socio-cognitive traits and entrepreneurship: the moderating role of economic institutions. J. Bus. Ventur. 34 (2019), 178–196.
Boyer, T., Blazy, R., Born to be alive? The survival of innovative and non-innovative French micro-start-ups. Small Bus. Econ. 42 (2014), 669–683.
Brinckmann, J., Salomo, S., Gemuenden, H.G., Financial management competence of founding teams and growth of new technology–based firms. Entrep. Theory Pract. 35 (2011), 217–243.
Burck, J., Uhlich, T., Bals, C., Höhne, N., Nascimento, L., Climate change performance index 2024: background and methodology. https://ccpi.org/download/climate-change-performance-index-2024-background-and-methodology/, 2024.
Bylund, P.L., McCaffrey, M., A theory of entrepreneurship and institutional uncertainty. J. Bus. Ventur. 32 (2017), 461–475.
Calderini, M., Fia, M., Gerli, F., Organizing for transformative innovation policies: the role of social enterprises. Theoretical insights and evidence from Italy. Res. Policy, 52, 2023, 104818.
Calic, G., Mosakowski, E., Kicking off social entrepreneurship: how a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. J. Manag. Stud. 53 (2016), 738–767.
Carrión-Flores, C.E., Innes, R., Environmental innovation and environmental performance. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 59 (2010), 27–42.
Cattani, L., Montresor, S., Vezzani, A., Firms’ eco-innovation and industry 4.0 technologies in urban and rural areas. Reg. Stud., 2023, 1–13.
Ćetković, S., Hagemann, C., Changing climate for populists? Examining the influence of radical-right political parties on low-carbon energy transitions in Western Europe. Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 66, 2020, 101571.
Chang, C.H., Chen, Y.S., Green organizational identity and green innovation. Manag. Decis. 51 (2013), 1056–1070.
Chapman, G., Hottenrott, H., Green start-ups and the role of founder personality. J. Bus. Ventur. Insights, 17, 2022, e00316.
Cirera, X., Muzi, S., Measuring innovation using firm-level surveys: evidence from developing countries✰. Res. Policy, 49, 2020, 103912.
Cojoianu, T.F., Clark, G.L., Hoepner, A.G., Veneri, P., Wójcik, D., Entrepreneurs for a low carbon world: how environmental knowledge and policy shape the creation and financing of green start-ups. Res. Policy, 49, 2020, 103988.
Cornelissen, J.P., Akemu, O., Jonkman, J.G., Werner, M.D., Building character: the formation of a hybrid organizational identity in a social enterprise. J. Manag. Stud. 58 (2021), 1294–1330.
Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Marin, G., Paglialunga, E., Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 155 (2017), 141–154.
Crecente, F., Sarabia, M., del Val, M.T., Climate change policy and entrepreneurial opportunities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 163, 2021, 120446.
Darnihamedani, P., Block, J.H., Institutional reforms and entrepreneurial gowth ambitions. Int. Small Bus. J. 42:7 (2024), 805–840.
Darnihamedani, P., Terjesen, S., Male and female entrepreneurs’ employment growth ambitions: the contingent role of regulatory efficiency. Small Bus. Econ. 58 (2022), 1–20.
De Marchi, V., Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: empirical evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res. Policy 41 (2012), 614–623.
DiVito, L., Ingen-Housz, Z., From individual sustainability orientations to collective sustainability innovation and sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Bus. Econ. 56 (2021), 1057–1072.
Dixon-Fowler, H.R., Slater, D.J., Johnson, J.L., Ellstrand, A.E., Romi, A.M., Beyond “does it pay to be green?” a meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. J. Bus. Ethics 112 (2013), 353–366.
Doblinger, C., Surana, K., Anadon, L.D., Governments as partners: the role of alliances in US cleantech startup innovation. Res. Policy 48 (2019), 1458–1475.
Douglas, E.J., Reconstructing entrepreneurial intentions to identify predisposition for growth. J. Bus. Ventur. 28 (2013), 633–651.
Dubini, P., The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: some hints for public policies. J. Bus. Ventur. 4 (1989), 11–26.
Dushnitsky, G., Lenox, M.J., When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Res. Policy 34 (2005), 615–639.
Eskander, S.M., Fankhauser, S., Reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from national climate legislation. Nat. Clim. Change 10 (2020), 750–756.
Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., Mickiewicz, T., Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations?. J. Bus. Ventur. 28 (2013), 564–580.
European Commission, SMEs, Start-ups, Scale-ups and Entrepreneurship. https://search.gesis.org/research_data/ZA7637, 2020 14 December 2022.
European Parliament, Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU. 2022, 15–80 http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj 20 December 2022.
Fabrizi, A., Guarini, G., Meliciani, V., Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Res. Policy 47 (2018), 1018–1031.
Fernando, Y., Jabbour, C.J.C., Wah, W.X., Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: does service capability matter?. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141 (2019), 8–20.
Fisch, C., Meoli, M., Vismara, S., Block, J.H., The effect of trademark breadth on IPO valuation and post-IPO performance: an empirical investigation of 1510 European IPOs. J. Bus. Ventur., 37, 2022, 106237.
Foxon, T., Pearson, P., Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. J. Clean. Prod. 16 (2008), 148–161.
Frenz, M., Ietto-Gillies, G., The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: evidence from the UK community innovation survey. Res. Policy 38 (2009), 1125–1135.
Freytag, A., Thurik, R., Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. J. Evol. Econ. 17 (2007), 117–131.
GEM, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2021/2022 Global Report: Opportunity Amid Disruption. 2022, GEM, London.
George, G., Merrill, R.K., Schillebeeckx, S.J., Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: how digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrep. Theory Pract. 45 (2021), 999–1027.
Germanwatch e.V., Climate Change Performance Index. 2019, Germanwatch, NewClimate Institute and Climate Action Network, Bonn.
Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Grybauskas, A., Vilkas, M., Petraitė, M., Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: a systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 30 (2021), 4237–4257.
GIIN, GIINsight: Sizing the Impact Investing Market 2022. https://thegiin.org/publication/research/impact-investing-market-size-2022/, 2022 (Accessed 28 August 2024).
Giudici, G., Guerini, M., Rossi-Lamastra, C., The creation of cleantech startups at the local level: the role of knowledge availability and environmental awareness. Small Bus. Econ. 52 (2019), 815–830.
Grimpe, C., Murmann, M., Sofka, W., Organizational design choices of high-tech startups: how middle management drives innovation performance. Strateg. Entrep. J. 13 (2019), 359–378.
Gupta, H., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Rezaei, J., Barriers and overcoming strategies to supply chain sustainability innovation. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 161, 2020, 104819.
Gupta, S., Czinkota, M., Melewar, T.C., Embedding knowledge and value of a brand into sustainability for differentiation. J. World Bus. 48 (2013), 287–296.
Guy, J., Shears, E., Meckling, J., National models of climate governance among major emitters. Nat. Clim. Change 13 (2023), 189–195.
Hashi, I., Stojčić, N., The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: evidence from the community innovation survey 4. Res. Policy 42 (2013), 353–366.
Hellström, T., Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco-innovation concepts. Sustain. Dev. 15 (2007), 148–159.
Hessels, J., Van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R., Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers. Small Bus. Econ. 31 (2008), 323–339.
Hirschmann, M., Block, J.H., Trademarks and how they relate to the sustainability and economic outcomes of social startups. J. Clean. Prod., 376, 2022, 134320.
Hirschmann, M., Moritz, A., Block, J.H., Motives, supporting activities, and selection criteria of social impact incubators: an experimental conjoint study. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 51 (2022), 1095–1133.
Hirschmann, M., Block, J.H., Krlev, G., Market, social, or both? Measuring social innovation through trademarks. Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2022, No. 1, 2022, Academy of Management, Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510, 14331.
Hockerts, K., Wüstenhagen, R., Greening goliaths versus emerging Davids—theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 25 (2010), 481–492.
Hofstede, G.H., National culture. https://geert-hofstede.com/national-culture.html, 2017.
Hoogendoorn, B., Van der Zwan, P., Thurik, R., Sustainable entrepreneurship: the role of perceived barriers and risk. J. Bus. Ethics 157 (2019), 1133–1154.
Hoogendoorn, B., van der Zwan, P., Thurik, R., Goal heterogeneity at start-up: are greener start-ups more innovative?. Res. Policy, 49, 2020, 104061.
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., Rennings, K., Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol. Econ. 78 (2012), 112–122.
Horne, J., Fichter, K., Growing for sustainability: enablers for the growth of impact startups–a conceptual framework, taxonomy, and systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod., 349, 2022, 131163.
Howard-Grenville, J., Buckle, S.J., Hoskins, B.J., George, G., Climate change and management. Acad. Manage. J. 57 (2014), 615–623.
Hox, J.J., Moerbeek, M., van de Schoot, R., Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. 3rd ed., 2017, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York, London.
Huang, S.Z., Lu, J.Y., Chau, K.Y., Zeng, H.L., Influence of ambidextrous learning on eco-innovation performance of startups: moderating effect of top management's environmental awareness. Front. Psychol., 11, 2020, 1976.
Huang, W., Climate policy uncertainty and green innovation. Econ. Lett., 233, 2023, 111423.
Ingold, K., Stadelmann-Steffen, I., Kammermann, L., The acceptance of instruments in instrument mix situations: Citizens’ perspective on Swiss energy transition. Res. Policy, 48, 2019, 103694.
Jensen, F., Lööf, H., Stephan, A., New ventures in Cleantech: opportunities, capabilities and innovation outcomes. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 29 (2020), 902–917.
Ketata, I., Sofka, W., Grimpe, C., The role of internal capabilities and firms’ environment for sustainable innovation: evidence for Germany. R&D Manag. 45 (2015), 60–75.
Khatami, F., Scuotto, V., Krueger, N., Cantino, V., The influence of the entrepreneurial ecosystem model on sustainable innovation from a macro-level lens. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 18 (2022), 1419–1451.
Kiefer, C.P., Del Rio Gonzalez, P., Carrillo-Hermosilla, J., Drivers and barriers of eco-innovation types for sustainable transitions: a quantitative perspective. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 28 (2019), 155–172.
Kleinhempel, J., Beugelsdijk, S., Klasing, M.J., The changing role of social capital during the venture creation process: a multilevel study. Entrep. Theory Pract. 46 (2022), 297–330.
Kolvereid, L., Growth aspirations among Norwegian entrepreneurs. J. Bus. Ventur. 7 (1992), 209–222.
Kuckertz, A., Wagner, M., The influence of sustainability orientation on entrepreneurial intentions—investigating the role of business experience. J. Bus. Ventur. 25 (2010), 524–539.
Kunapatarawong, R., Martínez-Ros, E., Towards green growth: how does green innovation affect employment?. Res. Policy 45 (2016), 1218–1232.
Labella-Fernández, A., Serrano-Arcos, M.M., Payán-Sánchez, B., Tchounwou, P., Firm growth as a driver of sustainable product innovation: mediation and moderation analysis; evidence from manufacturing firms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18 (2021), 1–22.
Leonidou, L.C., Leonidou, C.N., Kvasova, O., Antecedents and outcomes of consumer environmentally friendly attitudes and behaviour. J. Mark. Manag. 26 (2010), 1319–1344.
Magness, V., Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. J. Bus. Ethics 83 (2008), 177–192.
Mandhachitara, R., Poolthong, Y., A model of customer loyalty and corporate social responsibility. J. Serv. Mark. 25 (2011), 122–133.
Marnoto, S., Silva, C., Veiga, P.M., Beyond profit in family businesses: ESG-driven business model innovation and the critical role of digital capabilities. J. Fam. Bus. Manag., 2024, 10.1108/JFBM-05-2024-0105.
Mason, C., Brown, R., Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Bus. Econ. 40 (2013), 211–225.
Mendonça, S., Pereira, T.S., Godinho, M.M., Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Res. Policy 33 (2004), 1385–1404.
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J., Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad. Manage. Rev. 22 (1997), 853–886.
Murphy, K.R., Aguinis, H., Reporting interaction effects: visualization, effect size, and interpretation. J. Manag. 48 (2022), 2159–2166.
Nill, J., Kemp, R., Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: from niche to paradigm?. Res. Policy 38 (2009), 668–680.
Niu, S., Zhang, J., Luo, R., Feng, Y., How does climate policy uncertainty affect green technology innovation at the corporate level? New evidence from China. Environ. Res., 237, 2023, 117003.
Noailly, J., Nowzohour, L., van den Heuvel, M., Does environmental policy uncertainty hinder investments towards a low-carbon economy? National Bureau of Economic Research. No. w30361. Working Paper, 2022.
North, D.C., Institutions. J. Econ. Perspect. 5 (1991), 97–112.
OECD, Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd ed., 2005, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
Overgaard, C., Kerlin, J.A., A legally-informed definition of volunteering in nonprofits and social enterprises: unpaid work meets profit motives. Nonprofit Manag. Leadersh. 32 (2022), 429–447.
Pan, F., Yang, B., Financial development and the geographies of startup cities: evidence from China. Small Bus. Econ. 52 (2019), 743–758.
Pena, I., Intellectual capital and business start-up success. J. Intellect. Cap. 3 (2002), 180–198.
Phillips, W., Alexander, E.A., Lee, H., Going it alone won't work! The relational imperative for social innovation in social enterprises. J. Bus. Ethics 156 (2019), 315–331.
Pollmeier, T., Hirschmann, M., Fisch, C., Exploring the signaling effect of B Corp certification in entrepreneurial finance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 493, 2025, 144978.
Puente, R., Cervilla, M.A., González, C.G., Auletta, N., Determinants of the growth aspiration: a quantitative study of Venezuelan entrepreneurs. Small Bus. Econ. 48 (2017), 699–726.
Puertas, R., Marti, L., International ranking of climate change action: an analysis using the indicators from the climate change performance index. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 148, 2021, 111316.
Ramzan, M., Abbasi, K.R., Salman, A., Dagar, V., Alvarado, R., Kagzi, M., Towards the dream of go green: an empirical importance of green innovation and financial depth for environmental neutrality in world's top 10 greenest economies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 189, 2023, 122370.
Rannikko, H., Autio, E., Retaining winners: can policy boost high-growth entrepreneurship?. Res. Policy 45 (2016), 42–55.
Rogge, K.S., Schleich, J., Do policy mix characteristics matter for low-carbon innovation? A survey-based exploration of renewable power generation technologies in Germany. Res. Policy 47 (2018), 1639–1654.
Rugman, A.M., Verbeke, A., Corporate strategy and international environmental policy. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 29 (1998), 819–833.
Rypestøl, J.O., Aarstad, J., Entrepreneurial innovativeness and growth ambitions in thick vs. thin regional innovation systems. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 30 (2018), 639–661.
Schaltegger, S., Wagner, M., Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 20 (2011), 222–237.
Schaub, S., Tosun, J., Jordan, A., Enguer, J., Climate policy ambition: exploring a policy density perspective. Politics Gov. 10 (2022), 226–238.
Schmitz, E.A., Baum, M., Huett, P., Kabst, R., The contextual role of regulatory stakeholder pressure in proactive environmental strategies: an empirical test of competing theoretical perspectives. Organ. Environ. 32 (2019), 281–308.
Schwab, K., The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. 2019, World Economic Forum.
Sedláček, P., Sterk, V., The growth potential of startups over the business cycle. Am. Econ. Rev. 107 (2017), 3182–3210.
Sena, V., Kanungo, R.P., Ozdemir, S., Yannopoulou, N., Patel, P., Are reshoring decisions influenced by external stakeholders and country-level environmental regulation?. Br. J. Manag. 34 (2023), 1184–1214.
Shui, X., Zhang, M., Wang, Y., Smart, P., Do climate change regulatory pressures increase corporate environmental sustainability performance? The moderating roles of foreign market exposure and industry carbon intensity. Br. J. Manag. 36:1 (2024), 223–239.
Smith, A., Kern, F., Raven, R., Verhees, B., Spaces for sustainable innovation: solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81 (2014), 115–130.
Song, Y., Sahut, J.M., Zhang, Z., Tian, Y., Hikkerova, L., The effects of government subsidies on the sustainable innovation of university-industry collaboration. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 174, 2022, 121233.
Sørensen, J.B., Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Adm. Sci. Q. 52 (2007), 387–412.
Stam, E., Suddle, K., Hessels, J., Stel, A.V., High-growth entrepreneurs, public policies, and economic growth. Public Policies for Fostering Entrepreneurship, 2009, Springer, New York, NY, 91–110.
Steffen, B., Karplus, V., Schmidt, T.S., State ownership and technology adoption: the case of electric utilities and renewable energy. Res. Policy, 51, 2022, 104534.
Szerb, L., Vörös, Z., The changing form of overconfidence and its effect on growth expectations at the early stages of startups. Small Bus. Econ. 57 (2021), 151–165.
Teece, D.J., Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28 (2007), 1319–1350.
Teeter, P., Sandberg, J., Constraining or enabling green capability development? How policy uncertainty affects organizational responses to flexible environmental regulations. Br. J. Manag. 28 (2017), 649–665.
Todeschini, B.V., Cortimiglia, M.N., Callegaro-de-Menezes, D., Ghezzi, A., Innovative and sustainable business models in the fashion industry: entrepreneurial drivers, opportunities, and challenges. Bus. Horiz. 60 (2017), 759–770.
Troilo, M., Legal institutions and high-growth aspiration entrepreneurship. Econ. Syst. 35 (2011), 158–175.
Van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R., Bosma, N., Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Bus. Econ. 24 (2005), 365–380.
Varadarajan, R., Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 45 (2017), 14–36.
Vasileiou, E., Georgantzis, N., Attanasi, G., Llerena, P., Green innovation and financial performance: a study on Italian firms. Res. Policy, 51, 2022, 104530.
Verheul, I., Van Mil, L., What determines the growth ambition of Dutch early-stage entrepreneurs. Int. J. Entrep. Ventur. 3 (2011), 183–207.
Vickers, I., Lyon, F., Beyond green niches? Growth strategies of environmentally-motivated social enterprises. Int. Small Bus. J. 32 (2014), 449–470.
Victor, D.G., Lumkowsky, M., Dannenberg, A., Determining the credibility of commitments in international climate policy. Nat. Clim. Change 12 (2022), 793–800.
Voegtlin, C., Scherer, A.G., Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: governing sustainable development in a globalized world. J. Bus. Ethics 143 (2017), 227–243.
Walter, S.G., Block, J.H., Outcomes of entrepreneurship education: an institutional perspective. J. Bus. Ventur. 31 (2016), 216–233.
Wang, M., Li, Y., Li, J., Wang, Z., Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: a survey and structural model. J. Environ. Manage., 297, 2021, 113282.
Wei, S., Boudreaux, C.J., Su, Z., Wu, Z., Natural disasters, personal attributes, and social entrepreneurship: an attention-based view. Small Bus. Econ. 62 (2024), 1409–1427.
Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D., Aspiring for, and achieving growth: the moderating role of resources and opportunities. J. Manag. Stud. 40 (2003), 1919–1941.
Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H., Shepherd, D.A., Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Bus. Econ. 32 (2009), 351–374.
World Bank, World development indicators. Available from https://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators, 2019 (Accessed 9 December 2022).
Ye, W., Su, Z., Ma, H., Does climate risk affect entrepreneurial growth aspirations? The moderating effects of gender and solo-founded ventures. Small Bus. Econ., 2023, 1–22.
Yoon, H., Tashman, P., Benischke, M.H., Doh, J., Kim, N., Climate impact, institutional context, and national climate change adaptation IP protection rates. J. Bus. Ventur., 39, 2024, 106359.
York, J.G., Vedula, S., Lenox, M.J., It's not easy building green: the impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Acad. Manage. J. 61 (2018), 1492–1523.
Zahra, S.A., The resource-based view, resourcefulness, and resource management in startup firms: a proposed research agenda. J. Manag. 47 (2021), 1841–1860.
Zhao, Y.L., Libaers, D., Song, M., First product success: a mediated moderating model of resources, founding team startup experience, and product-positioning strategy. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 32 (2015), 441–458.