[en] The social and cultural understanding of disability has indicated that it is primarily a consequence of attributional processes, idealized and generalized conceptions of ability, and structural discrimination. Assuming the validity of these conceptualizations, the focus shifts to relational dynamics that determine how and if disability is ‘felt.’ This study explores this relationality in the context of couples parenting a child with disabilities. Intersections of gender and disability associated with self-positioning as ‘special parents’ include specific affective couple arrangements. This study reports on a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with couples who were interviewed first together and then individually. The results indicate a subjectivation of couples as ‘special parents,’ which is difficult to reject and includes affective aspects as well as gendered inequalities in care. Disabling affects are delegated to and felt by the female partner, leading to affective inequalities in the partnership. The couple positions the mother as the one who ‘suffers,’ which is part of a well-known affective repertoire that is implied by ableism to feel. The theoretical implications of these empirical results will be discussed as twofold: first, as an entry point to understanding disability via affection—how to be affected by disability along intersected cultural attributions; and second, as a suggestion to bridge cognitive and behavioral approaches to emotion by elaborating on how disabling affects become felt and enacted in subjectivation and relation.
Disciplines :
Sociologie & sciences sociales
Auteur, co-auteur :
TRÖNDLE, Judith ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Education and Social Work (DESW) > Social Research and Interventions
Co-auteurs externes :
no
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Delegated disabling affects in partnership
Date de publication/diffusion :
2025
Titre du périodique :
Frontiers in Sociology
eISSN :
2297-7775
Maison d'édition :
Frontiers. Sec. Sociology of Emotion, Lausanne, Suisse
Titre particulier du numéro :
Research Topic Affecting, Emoting, and Feeling Disability: Entanglements at the Intersection of Disability Studies and the Sociology of Emotions
Ahmed S. (2010a). “1 Happy Objects” The affect theory reader. eds. Gregg M. Seigworth G. J. (New York, USA: Duke University Press), 29–51.
Ahmed S. (2010b). Killing joy: feminism and the history of happiness. Signs J. Women Cult. Soc. 35, 571–594. doi: 10.1086/648513
Ahmed S. (2010c). The promise of happiness. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
Akremi L. Baur N. Knoblauch H. Traue B. (Eds.) (2018). Handbuch interpretativ forschen, Grundlagentexte Methoden. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Alkemeyer T. Budde G. Freist D. (Eds.) (2013). Selbst-Bildungen: soziale und kulturelle Praktiken der Subjektivierung, Praktiken der Subjektivierung 1. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Althusser L. (1977). Ideologie und ideologische Staatsapparate: Aufsätze zur marxististischen Theorie. Positionen 3. Hamburg: VSA.
Anderson B. (2014). Encountering affect: capacities, apparatuses, conditions. Surrey a.o.: Ashgate.
Bamberg M. (2022). “Positioning the subject. Agency between master and counter” in Positioning the subject. Methodologien der Subjektivierungsforschung/methodologies of subjectivation research. eds. Bosančić S. Brodersen F. Pfahl L. Schürmann L. Spies T. Traue B. (Wiesbaden: Springer VS).
Biermann J. (2021). “Der Einfluss Der UN-BRK Auf Inklusive Bildung in Nigeria Und Deutschland” in Handbuch Inklusion international/international handbook of inclusive education: Globale, Nationale und Lokale Perspektiven auf Inklusive Bildung/Global, national and local perspectives. eds. Köpfer A. Powell J. J. W. Zahnd R.. 1st ed (Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich), 167–178.
Bosančić Saša Brodersen Folke Pfahl Lisa Schürmann Lena Spies Tina Traue Boris, eds. (2022). Following the subject. Grundlagen und Zugänge empirischer Subjektivierungsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Bosančić S. Keller R. (Eds.) (2019). Diskursive Konstruktionen: Kritik, Materialität und Subjektivierung in der wissenssoziologischen Diskursforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Bosančić S. Pfahl L. Traue B. (2019). “Empirische Subjektivierungsanalyse: Entwicklung des Forschungsfeldes und methodische Maximen der Subjektivierungsforschung” in Diskursive Konstruktionen: Kritik, Materialität und Subjektivierung in der wissenssoziologischen Diskursforschung. eds. Bosančić S. Keller R. (Wiesbaden: Springer VS).
Brennan T. (2015). The transmission of affect. Ithaka, London: Cornell University Press.
Brinkema E. (2014). The forms of the affects. Duke: University Press.
Buchner T. (2018). “Die Subjekte der Integration: Schule, Biographie und Behinderung” in Julius. ed. Verlag K. (Julius Klinkhardt: Bad Heilbrunn).
Buchner T. Pfahl L. Traue B. (2015). Zur Kritik der Fähigkeiten: Ableism als neue Forschungsperspektive der Disability Studies und ihrer Partner_innen. Zeitschrift für Inklusion 2.
Butler J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. 1. publ. ed. Thinking gender. New York a.o.: Routledge.
Butler J. (1993). Bodies that matter. New York: Routledge.
Butler J. (1997). The psychic life of power. Theories in subjection. Stanford: University Press.
Campbell F. K. (2008). Refusing able (ness): a preliminary conversation about ableism. M/C J. 11. doi: 10.5204/mcj.46
Carey A. C. (2020). Allies and obstacles: disability activism and parents of children with disabilities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Carey A. C. Block P. Scotch R. K. (2020). Allies and obstacles: disability activism and parents of children with disabilites. Philadelphia; Rome; Tokyo: Temple University Press.
Courcy I. Des Rivières C. (2017). “From cause to cure”: a qualitative study on contemporary forms of mother blaming experienced by mothers of young children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Fam. Soc. Work. 20, 233–250. doi: 10.1080/10522158.2017.1292184
Czedik S. Pfahl L. (2020). Aktivierende Arbeitsmarktpolitiken und berufliche Rehabilitation. Gouvernementalitätskritische Überlegungen zu Organisation, Funktion und Beschäftigungsbedingungen von Werkstätten für behinderte Menschen. Vierteljahresschrift für Heilpädagogik und ihre Nachbargebiete 89, 80–92. doi: 10.2378/vhn2020.art11d
Denzin N. K. (1989). “Interpretive biography” in Qualitative research methods 17 (Newbury Park a.o.: Sage).
Donati P. (2015) in The relational subject. ed. Archer M. S. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Doucet A. (2001). ‘You see the need perhaps more clearly than I have’: exploring gendered processes of domestic responsibility. J. Fam. Issues 22, 328–357. doi: 10.1177/019251301022003004
Doucet A. (2015). Parental responsibilities: dilemmas of measurement and gender equality. J. Marriage Fam. 77:224–242. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12148, PMID: 39910408
Ferguson P. M. (2001). “Mapping the family: disability studies and the exploration of parental response to disability” in Handbook of disability studies. eds. Albrecht G. L. Seelman K. D. Bury M. (Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: Sage), 373–395.
Ferguson P. M. (2002). A place in the familiy: an historical interpretation on parental reactions to having a child with a disability. J. Spec. Educ. 36, 124–131. doi: 10.1177/00224669020360030201
Foucault M. (1989). Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. Bibliothèque des histoires 0007883. Paris: Gallimard.
Fuchs T. (2024). Verkörperte Gefühle. Zur Phänomenologie von Affektivität und Interaffektivität. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Geimer A. Amling S. Bosančić S. (Eds.) (2019). Subjekt und Subjektivierung: empirische und theoretische Perspektiven auf Subjektivierungsprozesse. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Glaser B. G. Strauss A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. 1st Edn. London: Taylor and Francis.
Goodley D. (2014). Dis/ability studies: theorising disablism and ableism. 1st Edn. London [u.a.]: Routledge.
Goodley D. Liddiard K. Runswick-Cole K. (2018). Feeling disability: theories of affect and critical disability studies. Disabil. Soc. 33, 197–217. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2017.1402752
Goodley D. McLaughlin J. (2008). “Theorising parents, professionals and disabled babies” in Families raising disabled children. Enabling care and social justice. eds. McLaughlin J. Goodley D. Clavering E. Fisher P. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 1–20.
Gray D. E. (2002). ‘Everybody just freezes. Everybody is just embarrassed’: felt and enacted stigma among parents of children with high functioning autism. Sociol. Health Illn. 24, 734–749. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00316
Gregg M. Seigworth G. J. (2010). “An inventory of shimmers” in The affect theory reader. eds. Gregg M. Seigworth G. J. (Durham: Duke University Press), 1–25.
Haslanger S. (2021). Ideology in practice: what does ideology do? Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Marquette University Press.
Hinze D. (1999 [1991]). Väter und Mütter behinderter Kinder: der Prozeß der Auseinandersetzung im Vergleich. Heidelberg: Winter.
Hochschild A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. Am. J. Sociol. 85, 551–575. doi: 10.1086/227049
Hochschild A. R. (2012 [1989]). The second shift. Working families and the revolution at home. New York: Penguin Books.
Hochschild A. R. (2012 [1983]). The managed heart. Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Honneth A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hufendiek R. (2014). “Whereabouts: locating emotions between body, mind, and world” in Rethinking emotion: interiority and exteriority in premodern, modern, and contemporary thought. eds. Campe R. Weber J., Interdisciplinary German cultural studies, vol. 15 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 351–379.
Hufendiek R. (2016). “Embodied emotions: a naturalist approach to a normative phenomenon” in Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy 76. 1st ed (New York and London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group).
Hufendiek R. (2018). Explaining embodied emotions - with and without representations. Philos. Explor. 21, 319–331. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2018.1477985
Hughes B. (2009). Wounded/monstrous/abject: a critique of the disabled body in the sociological imaginary. Disabil. Soc. 24, 399–410. doi: 10.1080/09687590902876144
Hughes B. (2012). “Fear, pity and disgust: emotions and the non-disabled imaginary” in Handbook of disability studies. eds. Watson N. Roulstone A. Thomas C. (London: Routledge), 67–78.
Hughes B. Paterson K. (1997). The social model of disability and the disappearing body: towards a sociology of impairment. Disabil. Soc. 12, 325–340. doi: 10.1080/09687599727209
Illouz E. (2007). Cold intimacies: the making of emotional capitalism. Making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Illouz E. (2008). Saving the modern soul: therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. Culture of self-help. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Illouz E. (2012). Why love hurts: a sociological explanation. 1. Publ. reprinted Edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jackson A. J. (2021). Worlds of care: the emotional lives of fathers caring for children with disabilities. California series in public anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Karim S. (2021). Arbeit und Behinderung: Praktiken der Subjektivierung in Werkstätten und Inklusionsbetrieben. Disability Studies. Körper - Macht - Differenz; 16. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Kwok K. Kwok D. K. (2020). More than comfort and discomfort: emotion work of parenting children with autism in Hong Kong. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 118:105456. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105456
Lassinantti K. Almqvist A.-L. (2021). “‘Mums are mums’. Negotiations of parenthood ideals among Swedish mothers with ADHD” in Close relations - family, kinship, and beyond. eds. Henriksson H. W. Goedecke K., Crossroads of knowledge (Singapore: Springer Nature), 193–208.
Liddiard K. (2014). The work of disabled identities in intimate relationships. Disabil. Soc. 29, 115–128. doi: 10.1080/09687599.2013.776486
Marks D. (1999). Disability: controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.
Maskos R. (2015). Ableism und das Ideal des Autonomen Fähig-Seins in der kapitalistischen Gesellschaft. Zeitschrift für Inklusion 2.
McLaughlin J. Goodley D. Clavering E. Fisher P. (Eds.) (2008). Families raising disabled children. Enabling care and social justice. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Meißner H. (2010). Jenseits des autonomen Subjekts: zur gesellschaftlichen Konstitution von Handlungsfähigkeit im Anschluss an Butler, Foucault und Marx. Gender studies. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Mik-Meyer N. (2016). Othering, ableism and disability: a discursive analysis of co-workers’ construction of colleagues with visible impairments. Hum. Relat. 69, 1341–1363.
Oliver M. (2009). Understanding disability: from theory to practice. 2nd Edn. Basingstoke [u.a.]: Palgrave Macmillan.
Payton A. R. Thoits P. A. (2011). Medicalization, direct-to-consumer advertising, and mental illness stigma. Soc. Ment. Health 1, 55–70. doi: 10.1177/2156869310397959
Pedwell C. Whitehead A. (2012). Affecting feminism: questions of feeling in feminist theory. Fem. Theory 13, 115–129. doi: 10.1177/1464700112442635
Pfahl L. (2011). Techniken der Behinderung: der deutsche Lernbehinderungsdiskurs, die Sonderschule und ihre Auswirkungen auf Bildungsbiografien. Disability Studies 7. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Pfahl L. Schürmann L. Traue B. (2015). “Das Fleisch der Diskurse. Zur Verbindung von Biographie- und Diskursforschung in der wissenssoziologischen Subjektivierungsanalyse am Beispiel der Behindertenpädagogik” in Erziehungswissenschaftliche Diskursforschung: Empirische Analysen zu Bildungs- und Erziehungsverhältnissen. eds. Fegter S. Kessl F. Langer A. Ott M. Rothe D. Wrana D. (Wiesbaden: Springer VS).
Powell J. J. W. Pfahl L. Blanck J. M. (2021). “Sonderpädagogische Fördersysteme und inklusive Bildung” in Handbuch Bildungs- und Erziehungssoziologie. eds. Bauer U. Bittlingmayer U. H. Scherr A. (Wiesbaden: Springer VS).
Reh S. Rabenstein K. (2012). “Normen der Anerkennbarkeit in pädagogischen Ordnungen. Empirische Explorationen zur Norm der Selbständigkeit” in Judith Butler: Pädagogische Lektüren. eds. Ricken N. Balzer N. (Wiesbaden: Springer VS).
Ricken N. (2013). “Anerkennung als Adressierung. Über die Bedeutung von Anerkennung für Subjektivationsprozesse” in Selbst-Bildungen. Soziale und kulturelle Praktiken der Subjektivierung. eds. Alkemeyer T. Budde G. Freist D. (Bielefeld: Transcript).
Risdal D. Singer G. H. S. (2004). Marital adjustment in parents of children with disabilities: a historical review and meta-analysis. Res. Pract. Pers. Severe Disabil. 29, 95–103. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.29.2.95
Rosenthal G. (2018). Interpretive social research. An introduction. Göttingen: University Press.
Runswick-Cole K. (2013). “‘Wearing it all with a smile:’ emotional labour in the lives of mothers of disabled children” in Disabled children’s childhood studies: critical approaches in a global context. eds. Curran T. Runswick-Cole K. (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan), 105–118.
Ryan S. Runswick-Cole K. (2008). Repositioning mothers: mothers, disabled children and disability studies. Disabil. Soc. 23, 199–210. doi: 10.1080/09687590801953937
Schürmann L. (2013). Schmutz als Beruf: Prekarisierung, Klasse und Geschlecht in der Reinigungsbranche; eine wissenssoziologische Untersuchung. Arbeit, Demokratie, Geschlecht 17. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Schütz A. (1972). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Snyder S. L. Mitchell D. T. (2006). Cultural locations of disability. Chicago [u.a.]: University of Chicago Press.
Spies T. (2010). Migration und Männlichkeit: Biographien junger Straffälliger im Diskurs. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Spies T. Tuider E. (Eds.) (2017). Biographie und Diskurs: methodisches Vorgehen und Methodologische Verbindungen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Thomas C. (1999). Female forms: experiencing and understanding disability. Disability, human rights and society. Buckingham [u.a.]: Open University Press.
Traue B. (2010). Das Subjekt der Beratung: Zur Soziologie einer Psycho-Technik. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Traue B. Pfahl L. (2012). “Desubjektivierungen. Zum Verhältnis von Befähigung, Wissen und Recht nach dem Neoliberalismus” in Wechselverhältnis im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Dynamiken gesellschaftlicher Justierungsprozesse. eds. Bereswill M. Figlestahler C. Haller L. Y. Perels M. Zahradnik F. (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot).
Traue B. Pfahl L. (2022). “What is subjectivation? Key concepts and proposals for future research” in Following the Subject. Grundlagen und Zugänge empirischer Subjektivierungsforschung. eds. Bosančić S. Brodersen F. Pfahl L. Schürmann L. Spies T. Traue B. (Wiesbaden: Springer VS).
Traustadóttir R. (1991). Mothers who care: gender, disability, and family life. J. Familiy Iss. 12, 211–228. doi: 10.1177/019251391012002005
Traustadóttir R. (1995). “A mother’s work is never done: constructing a “normal” family life” in The variety of community experience: qualitative studies of family and community life. eds. Taylor S. J. Bogdan R. Lutfiyya Z. M. (Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes), 47–66.
Traustadóttir R. (2006). Disability und gender: introduction to the special issue. Scand. J. Disabil. Res. 8, 81–84. doi: 10.1080/15017410600831341
Tröndle J. (2022a). Elternschaft als Othering: zur Subjektivation von Paaren als Eltern eines Kindes mit Behinderung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Tröndle J. (2022b). “‚Subjectivation à deux‘ – Paare als Kollektivsubjekt” in Positioning the subject: Methodologien der Subjektivierungsforschung/methodologies of Subjectivation research. eds. Bosančić S. Brodersen F. Pfahl L. Schürmann L. Spies T. Traue B. (Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden), 261–285.
Tröndle J. Pfahl L. Traue B. (2024). Beyond complicity or Allyship: towards a new understanding of caregivers. Res. Soc. Sci. Disabil. (RSSD) 15, 185–200. doi: 10.1108/S1479-354720240000015012
von Poser A. Heyken E. Ta T. M. T. Hahn E. (2019). “Emotion repertoires” in Affective societies: key concepts. eds. Slaby J. von Scheve C. (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge), 241–251.
Waldschmidt A. (2017a). “Culture - theory - disability: encounters between disability studies and cultural studies” in Studies. Körper - Macht - Differenz. eds. Berressem H. Ingwersen M., vol. 10Disability (Bielefeld: Transcript).
Waldschmidt A. (2017b). “Disability goes cultural: the cultural model of disability as an analytical tool” in Culture - theory - disability: encounters between disability studies and cultural studies. ed. Waldschmidt A., Disability Studies. Körper - Macht - Differenz (Bielefeld: Transcript), 19–27.
Waldschmidt A. Schneider W. (2012). “(Nicht-) Behinderung anders denken” in Kultur: von den Cultural Studies bis zu den Visual Studies; eine Einführung. ed. Moebius S. (Bielefeld: Transcript), 128–150.
Wechuli Y. (2023a). Medicalizing disabled people's emotions-symptom of a dis/ableist society. Front. Sociol. 8:1230361. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1230361, PMID: 38148881
Wechuli Y. (2023b). “Zwischen Cripping und Reclaiming – wie die Disability Studies strategisch mit Gefühlen umgehen” in Zeitschrift für Disability Studies 1/2023. (Innsbruck: Innsbruck university press, ZDS)
Wechuli Y. (2024). “Behindernder Affekt – Auswirkungen von Emotionen auf Lebenswirklichkeiten aus Perspektive der Disability Studies” in Ambivalente Emotionen im Kontext von Inklusion und (Bad Heilbrunn: Bundesvereinigung Lebenshilfe, Verlag Julius Klinkhardt) Behinderung. eds. Dederich M. Schuppener S..
Wimbauer C. (2012). Wenn Arbeit Liebe ersetzt: Doppelkarriere-Paare zwischen Anerkennung und Ungleichheit. Frankfurt [u.a.]: Campus.
Wimbauer C. Motakef M. (2017). Das Paarinterview: Methodologie- Methode- Methodenpraxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
