Economics and Econometrics; Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all); Management of Technology and Innovation
Résumé :
[en] How do intellectual property rights influence academic science? We investigate the consequences of the introduction of software patents in the United States on the publications of university researchers in the field of computer science. Difference-in-difference estimations reveal that software scientists at US universities produced fewer publications (both in terms of quantity and quality) than their European counterparts after patent rights for software inventions were introduced. We then introduce a theoretical model that accounts for substitution and complementarity between patenting and publishing as well as for the direction of research. In line with the model's prediction, further results show that the decrease in publications is largest for scientists at the bottom of the ability distribution. Furthermore, we evidence a change in the direction of research following the reform toward more applied research.
Disciplines :
Stratégie & innovation
Auteur, co-auteur :
BERGE, Laurent ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance > Department of Economics and Management > Team Nicolas JONARD ; BxSE, UMR CNRS 6060, Maison de l'economie - BxSE, University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France
Doherr, Thorsten; ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany
HUSSINGER, Katrin ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Economics and Management (DEM)
Adams, J. D. (1990), ‘Fundamental stocks of knowledge and productivity growth (tm), Journal of Political Economy,98(4), 673-702.
Aghion, P. and P., Howitt (2005), ‘Growth with quality-improving innovations: an integrated framework (tm), in P. Aghion S. Durlauf (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth. Vol. 1A, Elsevier: North Holland, pp. 67-110.
Agrawal, A. and R., Henderson (2002), ‘Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT (tm), Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
Ahmadpoor, M. and B. F., Jones (2017), ‘The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance (tm), Science, 357(6351), 583-587.
Azoulay, P., W., Ding and T., Stuart (2009), ‘The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output (tm), The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637-676.
Bakels, R., A. G., Rishab, S., Torrisi and G., Thomas (2008), ‘Study on the Effects of Allowing Patent Claims for Computer-implemented Inventions. Final Report and Recommendations (tm), European Commission.
Bar-Ilan, J. (2008), ‘Which h-index? A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (tm), Scientometrics, 74(2), 257-271.
Bar-Ilan, J. (2010), ‘Web of Science with the Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes: the case of computer science (tm), Scientometrics, 83(3), 809-824.
B (c)nabou, R. and J., Tirole (2016), ‘Bonus culture: Competitive pay, screening, and multitasking (tm), Journal of Political Economy, 124(2), 305-370.
Bergstra, J. A. and P., Klint (2007), ‘About “trivial” software patents: The Is Not case (tm), Science of Computer Programming, 64(3), 264-285.
Bertrand, M., E., Duflo and S., Mullainathan (2004), ‘How Much Should We Trust Differences-in-Differences Estimates? (tm), Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249-275.
Bessen, J. and M. J., Meurer (2005), ‘Lessons for patent policy from empirical research on patent litigation (tm), Lewis and Clark L. Rev, 9(1), 1-27.
Bessen, J. and R. M., Hunt (2004) ‘The software patent experiment, (tm) Paris:E´ditions OCDE, 247-263.
Bessen, J. and R. M., Hunt (2007), ‘An empirical look at software patents (tm), Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 16(1), 157-189.
Blumenthal, D., E. G., Campbell, N., Causino and K. S., Louis (1996), ‘Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry (tm), New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734-1739.
Boldrin, M. and D. K., Levine (2013), ‘The case against patents (tm), Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 3-22.
Burk, D. L. and M. A., Lemley (2003), ‘Policy levers in patent law (tm), Virginia Law Review. Vol. 89, pp. 1575.
Callaert, J., M., Du Plessis, J., Grouwels, C., Lecocq, T., Magerman, B., Peeters, X., Song, B., Van Looy and C., Vereyen (2011) ‘Patent statistics at eurostat: Methods for regionalisation, sector allocation and name harmonisation, (tm) Eurostat Methodologies and Working Papers.
Campbell, E. G., B. R., Clarridge, M., Gokhale, L., Birenbaum, S., Hilgartner, N. A., Holtzman and D., Blu-menthal (2002), ‘Data withholding in academic genetics: evidence from a national survey (tm), Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(4), 473-480.
Cockburn, I. M. and M. J., MacGarvie (2011), ‘Entry and patenting in the software industry (tm), Management Science, 57(5), 915-933.
Crespi, G. A., A., Geuna and L., Nesta (2007), ‘The mobility of university inventors in Europe (tm), The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 195-215.
Czarnitzki, D., K., Hussinger and C., Schneider (2011), ‘Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting (tm), Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(5), 1403-1437.
Czarnitzki, D., T., Doherr, K., Hussinger, P., Schliessler and A. A., Toole (2016), ‘Knowledge creates markets: The influence of entrepreneurial support and patent rights on academic entrepreneurship (tm), European Economic Review. Vol. 86, pp. 131-146.
Czarnitzki, D., W., Gl̈anzel and K., Hussinger (2009), ‘Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research (tm), Research Policy, 38(1), 26-34.
Dasgupta, P. and P. A., David (1994), ‘Toward a new economics of science (tm), Research Policy, 23(5), 487-521.
Deshpande, A. and D., Riehle (2008), ‘The Total Growth of Open Source (tm), Springer: Boston, MA, 197-209.
Eisenberg, R. (1996), ‘Patents: help or hindrance to technology transfer? (tm), in L. V. McIntire F. B. Rudolph (eds), Biotechnology: Science, Engineering, and Ethical Challenges for the Twenty-First Century. National Academies Press: Washington, D.C.
Ejermo, O. and H., Toivanen (2018), ‘University invention and the abolishment of the professor (tm)s privilege in Finland (tm), Research Policy, 47(4), 814-825.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002), ‘Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks (tm), Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115-128.
Fabrizio, K. R. and A. D., Minin (2008), ‘Commercializing the laboratory: Faculty patenting and the open science environment (tm), Research Policy, 37(5), 914-931.
Fowler, C. (2000), ‘The Plant Patent Act of 1930: A sociological history of its creation (tm), Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, 82(9), 621.
Franceschet, M. (2010), ‘The role of conference publications in CS (tm), Communications of the ACM, 53(12), 129-132.
Galasso, A., M., Mitchell and G., Virag (2018), ‘A theory of grand innovation prizes (tm), Research Policy, 47(2), 343-362.
Gallini, N. T. (2002), ‘The economics of patents: Lessons from recent US patent reform (tm), Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 131-154.
Gans, J. S. and F., Murray (2011), ‘Funding scientific knowledge: Selection, disclosure and the public-private portfolio (tm), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, pp. 51-103.
González, A. G. (2006), ‘The software patent debate (tm), Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 1(3), 196-206.
Graham, S. J. H. and D. C., Mowery (2003), ‘Intellectual property protection in the US software industry (tm), W. Cohen, S. Merrill (edS), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Vol. 219, The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, pp. 219-231.
Griliches, Z. (1979), ‘Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth (tm), Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92-116.
Griliches, Z. (1992), ‘The Search for R & D Spillovers (tm), Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94(1), S29-47.
Guntersdorfer, M. (2003), ‘Software patent law: United States and Europe compared (tm), Duke Law and Technology Review, 2(1), 1-12.
Hall, B. H., A. N., Link and J. T., Scott (2003), ‘Universities as research partners (tm), Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 485-491.
Hall, B. H. and M. G., Megan (2010), ‘The private value of software patents (tm), Research Policy, 39(7), 994-1009.
Henderson, R., A. B., Jaffe and M., Trajtenberg (1998), ‘Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988 (tm), Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 119-127.
Huang, P. and Z., Zhang (2016), ‘Participation in Open Knowledge Communities and Job-Hopping (tm), MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 785-806.
Hvide, H. K. and B. F., Jones (2018), ‘University Innovation and the Professor (tm)s Privilege (tm), American Economic Review, 108(7), 1860-98.
Ingram, T. (2014), ‘Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. the product of nature doctrine revisited (tm), Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 29(2014), 385.
Jaffe, A. B. (1989), ‘Real effects of academic research (tm), American Economic Review, 79(5), 957-970.
Jones, C.I. (2005), ‘Growth and ideas (tm), in P. Aghion and S. Durlauf (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth. Vol. 1, Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, pp. 1063-1111.
Kahneman, D., J. L., Knetsch and R. H., Thaler (1990), ‘Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem (tm), Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325-1348.
Kaiser, U., H. C., Kongsted, K., Laursen and A. -K., Ejsing (2018), ‘Experience matters: The role of academic scientist mobility for industrial innovation (tm), Strategic Management Journal, 39(7), 1935-1958.
Klevorick, A. K., R. C., Levin, R. R., Nelson and S. G., Winter (1995), ‘On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities (tm), Research Policy, 24(2), 185-205.
Kogan, L., D., Papanikolaou, A., Seru and N., Stoffman (2017), ‘Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth (tm), The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 665-712.
Kortum, S. and J., Lerner (1999), ‘What is behind the recent surge in patenting? (tm), Research policy, 28(1), 1-22.
Krimsky, S. (2003), ‘Science in the Private interest: Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical research?Rowman and Littlefield: Lanham, Maryland, U.S.A.
Lach, S. and M., Schankerman (2008), ‘Incentives and invention in universities (tm), The RAND Journal of economics, 39(2), 403-433.
Laredo, P. (2007), ‘Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? (tm), Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441-456.
Lerner, J. and J., Tirole (2002), ‘Some simple economics of open source (tm), The Journal of Industrial Economics,50(2), 197-234.
Love, B. J. (2014), ‘Do University Patents Pay Off? Evidence from a Survey of University Inventors in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering (tm), Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 16(2014), 285-343.
Lunney Jr, G. S. (2000), ‘e-Obviousness (tm), Michigan Telecommication and Technology Law Review, 7(2000), 363.
Magerman, T., B., Van Looy and K., Debackere (2015), ‘Does involvement in patenting jeopardize one (tm)s academic footprint? An analysis of patent-paper pairs in biotechnology (tm), Research Policy, 44(9), 1702-1713.
Merges, R. P. and R. R., Nelson (1994), ‘On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: The effect of patent scope decisions (tm), Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25(1), 1-24.
Mowery, D. C. and A. A., Ziedonis (2002), ‘Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States (tm), Research Policy, 31(3), 399-418.
Mowery, D. C. and B. N., Sampat (2001), ‘University patents and patent policy debates in the USA, 1925-1980 (tm), Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 781-814.
Mowery, D. C., R. R., Nelson, B. N., Sampat and A. A., Ziedonis (2001), ‘The growth of patenting and licensing by US universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980 (tm), Research Policy, 30(1), 99-119.
Mowery, D. C. and B. N., Sampat (2005), ‘Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments? (tm), Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 115-127.
Murray, F. (2002), ‘Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering (tm), Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1389-1403.
Murray, F. and S., Stern (2007), ‘Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowl-edge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis (tm), Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,63(4), 648-687.
Noel, M. and M., Schankerman (2013), ‘Strategic patenting and software innovation (tm), The Journal of Industrial Economics, 61(3), 481-520.
Patterson, D., L., Snyder and J., Ullman (1999), ‘Evaluating Computer Scientists and Engineers For Promo-tion and Tenure (tm), Best Practices Memo, Computing Research News. CRA Computing Research Association: Washington DC.
Fini, R., A., Geuna, R., Grimaldi, A., Hughes, S., Krabel, M., Kitson, P., Llerena, F., Lissoni, A., Salter and M., Sobrero (2013), ‘Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations (tm), Research policy, 42(2), 423-442.
Rai, A. K. (2003), ‘Engaging facts and policy: A multi-institutional approach to patent system reform (tm), Columbia Law Review, 103(2003), 1035-1135.
Rai, A. K., J. R., Allison, B., Sampat and C., Crossman (2009), ‘University software ownership: Technology transfer or business as usual? (tm), University of North Carolina Law Review, 87(2009), 1519-1570.
Riehle, D. (2015), ‘How Open Source Is Changing the Software Developer (tm)s Career (tm), Computer, 48(5), 51-57.
Sampat, B. and H. L., Williams (2019), ‘How do patents affect follow-on innovation? Evidence from the human genome (tm), American Economic Review, 109(1), 203-36.
Sampat, B. N. (2018) ‘A survey of empirical evidence on patents and innovation, (tm) National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 25383.
Sampat, B. N., D. C., Mowery and A. A., Ziedonis (2003), ‘Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole act: a re-examination (tm), International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1371-1390.
Santos Silva, J. M. C. and S., Tenreyro (2006), ‘The log of gravity (tm), Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658.
Scotchmer, S. (1991), ‘Standing on the shoulders of giants: cumulative research and the patent law (tm), Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 29-41.
Stephan, P. E., S., Gurmu, A. J., Sumell and G., Black (2007), ‘Who (tm)s patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients (tm), Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 71-99.
Sterne, R. G. and L. B., Bugaisky (2004), ‘The Expansion of Statutory Subject Matter Under the 1952 Patent Act (tm), Akron Law Review, 37(2), 217-229.
Thursby, J. G., R., Jensen and M. C., Thursby (2001), ‘Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities (tm), The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 59-72.
Toole, A. A. (2012), ‘The impact of public basic research on industrial innovation: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry (tm), Research Policy, 41(1), 1-12.
Toole, A. A. and D., Czarnitzki (2010), ‘Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? (tm), Management Science, 56(9), 1599-1614.
van Overwalle, G. (1999), ‘Patent protection for plants: a comparison of American and European approaches (tm), IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, 39(1999), 143.
Visser, M. S. and H. F., Moed (2005) ‘Developing bibliometric indicators of research performance in computer science, (tm) Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, pp. 275-279. Leiden University, Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS): P.O. Box 9555, 2300 RB Leiden (The Netherlands).
Webbink, M. H. (2005), ‘A new paradigm for intellectual property rights in software (tm), Duke Law and Technology Review, 4(1), 1-15.
Williams, H. L. (2017), ‘How do patents affect research investments? (tm), Annual Review of Economics, 9(1), 441-469.
Zucker, L. G., M. R., Darby and M., Torero (2002), ‘Labor mobility from academe to commerce (tm), Journal of Labor Economics, 20(3), 629-660.
