Un-procedural Customary Law

GRADONI, Lorenzo

doi:10.1093/jnlids/idz008

Request a copy

Article (Scientific journals)

Un-procedural Customary Law

GRADONI, Lorenzo

2019 • In Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 10 (2), p. 175 - 199

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10993/63511

DOI
10.1093/jnlids/idz008

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

LGradoni_Un-procedural Customary Law.pdf

Publisher postprint (357.51 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

International Law; Customary International Law; Procedural Law; History of International Law

Abstract :

[en] The article looks at customary international law in a broad comparative perspective to show that, whilst the power to determine what customary law demands has been typically entrusted to authorities acting in the framework of special procedural arrangements, the international variant of customary law has never found a procedural ‘resting place’. The article further argues that there is a connection between the un-procedural character of customary international law and its long-standing ‘identity crisis’. It finally reads the latter through the lens of Jungian concepts of Mask and Shadow, which contribute to explaining the elements of uncertainty, ambiguity and concealment that are so central to discourses about international custom.

Disciplines :

European & international law

Author, co-author :

GRADONI, Lorenzo ; University of Luxembourg > Luxembourg Centre for European Law (LCEL) > LCEL Research ; Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law, Luxembourg

External co-authors :

Language :

English

Title :

Un-procedural Customary Law

Publication date :

June 2019

Journal title :

Journal of International Dispute Settlement

ISSN :

2040-3585

eISSN :

2040-3593

Publisher :

Oxford University Press

Volume :

Issue :

Pages :

175 - 199

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

http://academic.oup.com/jids/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/jnlids/idz008/28554870/idz008.pdf

Available on ORBilu :

since 07 January 2025

Statistics

Number of views

38 (0 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

WoS citations^™

Bibliography

PM Dupuy, ‘L’unité de l’ordre juridique international: cours général de droit international public’ (2002) 297 Collected Courses Hague Acad Int’l L 9, 198:
L Gradoni, ‘La Commissione del diritto internazionale riflette sulla rilevazione della consuetudine’ (2014) 97 Rivista di diritto internazionale 667, 677–81.
L Gradoni, ‘The International Court of Justice and the International Customary Law Game of Cards’ in M Andenas and E Björge (eds), A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2015) 371, 378–82.
L Fumagalli, ‘Evidence Before the International Court of Justice: Issues of Fact and Questions of Law in the Determination of International Custom’ in N Boschiero and others (eds), International Courts and the Development of International Law. Essays in Honour of Tullio Treves (Asser Press 2013) 137).
A Riddel and B Plant, Evidence Before the International Court of Justice (BIICL 2009) 145–47.
For M Kazazi, Burden of Proof and Related Issues: A Study of Evidence before International Tribunals (Kluwer 1996) 44–50, 44
JF Poudret, ‘Connaissance et preuve de la coutume en Europe occidentale au moyen âge et à l’époque moderne (rapport de synthèse)’ in Custom. Second Part: Medieval and Modern Western Europe, LII Transactions of the Jean Bodin Society for Comparative Institutional History (De Boeck 1990) 511, 518–23
JQ Whitman, ‘Why Did the Revolutionary Lawyers Confuse Custom and Reason?’ (1991) 58 Uni Chi LR (1991) 1321, 1340–47.
A Csizmadia, ‘La coutume en Hongrie’ in Custom. Third Part: Eastern Europe, Asia and Islam, LIII Transactions of the Jean Bodin Society for Comparative Institutional History (De Boeck 1992) 85, 89
W Uruszczak, ‘La coutume et la loi dans la pensée juridique polonaise des XVIe et XVIIe siècles’ in Custom III 145, 147.
CA Bradley, ‘Customary International Law Adjudication as Common Law Adjudication’ in CA Bradley (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 34.
L Blutman, ‘Conceptual Confusion and Methodological Deficiencies: Some Ways That Theories on Customary International Law Fail’ (2014) 25
L Kirchmair, ‘What Came First: The Obligation of the Belief? A Renaissance of Consensus Theory to Make the Normative Foundation of Customary International Law More Tangible’ (2016) 59 German Yrbk Int’l L 289;
O Sender and M Wood, ‘A Mystery No Longer: Opinio Juris and Other Theoretical Controversies Associated with Customary International Law’ (2017) 50 Israel Law Review 299.
HA Strydom, ‘Customary International Law: The Legacy of the False Prophets’ (1994) 27 Comparative & Int’l LJ of South Africa 276, 312:
‘The Decay of Modern Customary International Law in Spite of Scholarly Heroism’ in G Ziccardi Capaldo (ed), The Global Community: Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence (OUP 2015) 9, 28–29
PS Rao, ‘The Identification of Customary International Law: A Process that Defies Description’ (2017) 57 Indian J Int’l L 221.
RY Jennings, ‘The Identification of International Law’ in B Cheng (ed), International Law: Teaching and Practice (1982) 3, 5
RB Serjeant, ‘The Customary Law of South-West Arabia and Bedouin Justice in Jordan’ in Custom III 269, 271.
M Gluckman, The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia (Manchester University Press 1955) 238–39.
AL Epstein, Juridical Techniques and the Judicial Process: A Study in African Customary Law (Manchester University Press 1954) 36.
J Gilissen, ‘La coutume: essai de synthèse générale’, in Custom. Fourth Part: The Contemporary World, LIV Transactions of the Jean Bodin Society for Comparative Institutional History (De Boeck 1989) 433
MB Hooker, Legal Pluralism: An Introduction to Colonial and Neo-Colonial Law (Clarendon 1975);
AN Allott, New Essays in African Law (Butterworths 1970);
H Kuper and L Kuper (eds), African Law: Adaptation and Development (University of California Press 1965).
HF Morris, ‘Jurisdiction of the Buganda Courts and the Scope of Customary Law in Uganda’ (1965) 9 J African L 154;
AO Obilade, ‘Reform of Customary Court Systems in Nigeria under the Military Government’ (1969) 13 J African L 28;
AO Obilade, ‘Jurisdiction in Customary Law Matters in Nigeria: A Critical Examination’ (1973) 17 J African L 227;
A Ladley, ‘Changing the Courts in Zimbabwe: The Customary Law and Primary Courts Act’ (1982) 26 J African L 95.
TW Bennett and T Vermeulen, ‘Codification of Customary Law’ (1980) 24 J African L 207;
S Falk Moore, Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary” Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880-1980 (Cambridge University Press 1986).
Sir J Baker, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, vol VI (OUP 2003) 277:
A Gouron, ‘Aurore de la coutume’ in Coutumes et libertés. Actes des journées internationales de Toulouse, 4-7 juin 1987 (Publications de la Société d’histoire du droit et des institutions des anciens pays de droit écrit 1988) 181
H Pissard, Essai sur la connaissance et la preuve des coutumes en justice, dans l’ancien droit français et dans le système romano-canonique (Rousseau 1910);
J Gilissen, ‘La preuve de la coutume dans l’ancien droit belge’, in Hommage au Professeur Paul Bonenfant (1899-1965). Etudes d’his-torie médiévale dédiées à sa mémoire par les anciens élèves de son séminaire à l’Université libre de Bruxelles (Publications de l’ULB 1965) 563;
E Conte, ‘Roman Law vs Custom in a Changing Society: Italy in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Century’ in P Andersen and M Münster-Swendsen (eds), Custom: The Development and Use of a Legal Concept in the Middle Ages. Proceedings of the Fifth Carlsberg Academy Conference on Medieval Legal History 2008 (DJØF 2009) 33.
A Ross, On Law and Justice (University of California Press 1959) 92.
L Waelkens, La théorie de la coutume chez Jacques de Révigny. Edition et analyse de sa répétition sur la loi De quibus (Brill 1984) 485–86.
O Sachelarie, ‘La modernisation du droit en Roumanie au XIXe siècle et le problème de la coutume’ in Custom IV 207, 214.
D Plas, ‘La coutume et les usages en droit social belge au XXe siècle’ in Custom IV 293, 307–08.
H Izdebski, ‘La coutume en tant que source du droit dans les pays socialistes européens (l’U.R.S.S. inclu-sivement)’ in Custom IV 133, 155–56.
TA Bühler, ‘La coutume en Suisse (jusqu’à l’entrée en vigueur du Code civil suisse)’ in Custom II 359, 371.
R Thomas, ‘Writing, Law, and Written Law’ in M Gagarin and D Cohen (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law (Cambridge University Press 2005) 41, 48–49.
TO Elias, The Nature of African Customary Law (Manchester University Press 1956) 258, 275–76.
EA Keay and SS Richardson, The Native and Customary Courts of Nigeria (Sweet & Maxwell 1966) 209.
J Gray, ‘Opinions of Assessors in Criminal Trials in East Africa as to Native Custom’ (1958) 2 J African L 5, 15–17.
J Poumarède, ‘La coutume dans les pays de droit écrit’ in Custom II 233, 247.
P Vinogradoff, ‘Some Considerations on the Methods of Ascertaining Legal Customs’ in HAL Fisher (ed), The Collected Papers of Paul Vinogradoff with a Memoir, vol 2 (Clarendon 1928) 402, 405:
AN Allott, AL Epstein and M Gluckman, ‘Introduction’ in M Gluckman (ed), Ideas and Procedures in African Customary Law (OUP 1969) 1, 14.
ASJ Hannigan, ‘Native Custom, Its Similarity to English Conventional Custom and Its Mode of Proof’ (1958) 2 J African L 101.
W Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England [1765] (Clarendon 1966) 69.
JGA Pocock, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century. A Reissue with a Retrospect (Cambridge University Press 1987) 37:
JF Holleman, Shona Customary Law, with Reference to Kinship, Marriage, the Family and the Estate (OUP 1952) x.
M Gluckman, The Ideas in Barotse Jurisprudence (Manchester University Press 1965) 17:
PB Lafont, Toloi Djuat. Coutumier de la tribu Jarai (Publications de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient 1963) 14:
MM Green, Igbo Village Affairs, Chiefly with Reference to the Village of Umueke Agbaja (2nd edn, Cass 1964) 132.
C Ntampaka, ‘La coutume dans les droits africains après la réception des droits romanistes: l’exemple des pays d’Afrique centrale, le Rwanda et le Zaïre’ in Custom I 181, 186.
A Kiralfy, ‘Custom in Mediaeval English Law’ (1988) 9 J Legal History 26.
H Vogt, ‘“Secundum consuetudinem et leges patrie”: The Concept of Law and Custom in Thirteenth Century Denmark’ in Andersen and Münster-Swendsen (n 26) 67, 76.
E Cohen, The Crossroads of Justice: Law and Culture in Late Medieval France (Brill 1993) 27.
KN Llewellyn and EA Hoebel, The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence (University of Oklahoma Press 1941) 213:
C Mortet (ed), Livre de constitucions demenées el Chastelet de Paris (Mortet 1883).
A Gouron, ‘Coutume contre loi chez les premiers glossateurs’ in A Gouron and A Rigaudière (eds), Renaissance du pouvoir législatif et genèse de l’Etat (Publications de la Société d’histoire du droit et des institutions des anciens pays de droit écrit 1988) 117.
(JDM Derrett, Hindu Law Past and Present (Mukherjee & co. 1957) 78).
K Bentsi-Enchill, ‘The Colonial Heritage of Legal pluralism’ (1969) 1 Zambia LJ 1, 20.
WW Buckland and AD McNair, Roman Law and Common Law: A Comparison in Outline (2nd edn, Cambridge University Press 1965) 15.
P Brand, ‘Law and Custom in the English Thirteen Century Common Law’ in Andersen and Münster-Swendsen (n 26) 17, 26.
P Dumberry, The Formation and Identification of Rules of Customary International Law in International Investment Law (Cambridge University Press 2016) 39–42.
LA Fallers, Law Without Precedent (University of Chicago Press 1969) 3.
A Somek, ‘Beyond Kelsen and Hart’ in J Kammerhofer and J d’Aspremont (eds), International Legal Positivism in a Post-Modern World (OUP 2014) 151, 179.
A Cassese and JHH Weiler (eds), Change and Stability in International Law-Making (de Gruyter 1988) 85.
HE Chodosh, ‘Neither Treaty Nor Custom: The Emergence of Declarative International Law’ (1991) 26 Texas Int’l LJ 87, 99:
JF Murphy, The Evolving Dimensions of International Law: Hard Choices for the World Community (Cambridge University Press 2010) 3:
I Detter de Lupis, The Concept of International Law (Norstedts Juridik 1987) 113:
B Cheng, ‘United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: “Instant” Customary International Law?’ (1965) 5 Indian J Int’l L 23.
RJ Dupuy, ‘Coutume sage et coutume sauvage’ in Mélanges offerts à Charles Rousseau: la Communauté internationale (Pedone 1974) 75.
AE Roberts, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law’ (2001) 95 AJIL (2001) 757.
FL Kirgis, ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’ (1987) 81 AJIL 146.
GM Abi-Saab, ‘The Newly Independent States and the Rules of International Law: An Outline’ (1962) 8 Howard LJ 95, 103.
W Jenks, ‘The Will of the World Community as the Basis of Obligation in International Law’ in Hommage d’une génération de juristes au Président Basdevant (Pedone 1960) 280.
PD Baron, ‘The Influence of Psychoanalysis on Jurisprudence’ in T Murphy (ed), Western Jurisprudence (2004) 438, 450–51.
D Caudill, ‘Freud and Critical Legal Studies: Contours of a Radical Socio-Legal Psychoanalysis’ (1991) 66 Indiana L Rev 651.
P Goodrich, ‘Introduction: Psychoanalysis and Law’ in P Goodrich (ed), Law and the Unconscious: A Legendre Reader (Palgrave Macmillan 1997) 1, 5.
P Legendre, De la société comme texte. Linéaments d’une anthropologie dogmatique (Fayard 2001).
P Ricœur, De l’interprétation. Essai sur Freud (Seuil 1965).
JHH Weiler, ‘The Geology of International Law: Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy’ (2005) 64 ZaöRV 547, 548–49.
A Cassese, International Law in a Divided World (OUP 1986) 4
DR Kelley, The Human Measure: Social Thought in the Western Legal Tradition (Harvard University Press 1990).
M Koskenniemi, ‘The Pull of the Mainstream’ (1990) 88 Mich L Rev 1946.
S Estreicher, ‘Rethinking the Binding Effect of Customary International Law’ (2003) 44 Virginia J Int’l L 5.
A Carty, Philosophy of International Law (2nd edn, Edinburgh University Press 2017) 35.
L Gradoni, ‘Nullum crimen sine consuetudine: A Few Observations on How the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Has Been Identifying Custom’ (European Society of International Law Inaugural Conference, Agora Papers, 2004) 15 accessed 24 September 2018.
N Arajärvi, The Changing Nature of Customary International Law. Methods of Interpreting the Concept of Custom in International Criminal Tribunals (Routledge 2014) 73–74.
CA Bradley and M Gulati, ‘Withdrawing from International Custom’ (2010) 120 Yale LJ 220;
JA Green, The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law (OUP 2016).
A von Bogdandy and I Venzke, ‘The Spell of Precedents: Lawmaking by International Courts and Tribunals’ in CPR Romano and others (eds), Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (OUP 2013) 503;
H Ruiz Fabri and L Gradoni, ‘La hiérarchisation des précédents’ in N Aloupi and C Kleiner (eds), Le précédent en droit international. Colloque de Strasbourg (Pedone 2016) 191.
D Bodansky, ‘Prologue to a Theory of Non-treaty Norms’ in M Arsanjani and others (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W. Michael Reisman (Martinus Nijhoff 2011) 119, 127.
AD McNair, ‘Treaties Producing Effects “Erga Omnes”’ in Scritti di diritto internazionale in onore di Tomaso Perassi, vol II (Giuffrè 1957) 21
DG Mejía-Lemos, ‘Some Considerations Regarding “‘Instant’ Customary Law”, Fifty Years Later’ (2015) 55 Indian J Int’l L 85, 87;
KJ Heller, ‘Specially-Affected States and the Formation of Custom’ (2018) 112 AJIL 191.
B Stern, ‘Custom at the Heart of International Law’ (2001) 11 Duke J Comp & Int’l L (2001) 89, 102, 107–08.
Untitled document accessed 24 September 2018.
MP Scharf, Customary International Law in Times of Change: Recognizing Grotian Moments (Cambridge University Press 2013) 220, 216–17
SJ Choi and M Gulati, ‘Customary International Law: How Do Courts Do It?’ in Bradley (n 11) 117, 125:
N Petersen, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Judicial Politics of Identifying Customary International Law’ (2017) 28 EJIL 357.
L Gradoni, ‘L’attestation du droit international pénal coutumier dans la jurisprudence du Tribunal pour l’ex Yougoslavie: “Régularités” et “Règles”’ in M Delmas Marty and others (eds), Les sources du droit international pénal (Société de législation comparée 2004) 24.
D Bodansky, ‘Does Custom Have a Source?’ (2014) 108 AJIL Unbound 179:
H Ruiz Fabri, Sur quelques aspects de la théorie de la coutume en droit international (1989)
BS Chimni, ‘Customary International Law: A Third World Perspective’ (2018) 112 AJIL 1, whose optimism as to the possibility of harnessing international custom to foster the interests of subaltern classes is generally not shared by the participant in a symposium hosted by AJIL Unbound accessed 21 November 2018.
J Chinwe Okubuiro, ‘Application of Hegemony to Customary International Law: An African Perspective’ (2018) 7 Global J Comp L 232;
GRB Galindo and C Yip, ‘Customary International Law and the Third World: Do Not Step on the Grass’ (2017) 16 Chinese JIL 251.
W Heinrich, ‘Recherches sur la problématique du droit coutumier’ in Recueil d’études sur les sources du droit en l’honneur de François Gény, vol II (Sirey 1934) 277, 290:
MN White, ‘African Customary Law: The Problem of Concept and Definition’ (1965) 9 J African L 86, 87.