adolescents; behavior change; focus groups; health; mHealth; mobile health; mobile phone; physical activity; qualitative research; smartphone apps; Human Factors and Ergonomics; Health Informatics
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: There is solid evidence that lack of physical activity (PA) is a risk factor for chronic diseases. Sufficient levels of PA in childhood and adolescence are particularly important, as they can set the standards for PA levels in adulthood. The latest reports show that only a small percentage of adolescents reach the recommended levels of PA in European Union countries at the age of 15 years. In view of the scale of the problem, it is crucial to develop interventions that promote and support PA in adolescents. Considering their low implementation costs and ubiquitous presence, smartphone apps could be advantageous as a part of PA interventions.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at investigating the attitudes and preferences of adolescents aged 16-18 years toward various PA app features and components that could (1) make the app more attractive for them and consequently (2) increase their interest and engagement with the app.
METHODS: Two separate focus group discussions were conducted in 2 groups of adolescents (n=4 each) aged 16-18 years. Focus groups were carried out online via video conference. The discussions were conducted using a semistructured interview. Participants (n=8; 4 males and 4 females) had a mean age of 17.25 years (SD 0.82 years). Transcripts were analyzed following the approach by Krueger and Casey, that is, categorizing participants' answers and comments according to the questions and themes from the focus group schedule.
RESULTS: Features, such as "goal setting and planning," "coaching and training programs," "activity tracking," "feedback," and "location tracking" were appraised as attractive, motivating, and interesting. An "automatic activity recognition" feature was perceived as useful only under the condition that its precision was high. The "reminders" component was also deemed as useful only if a range of conditions was fulfilled (timeliness, opportunity for customization, etc). The features "mood and sleep tracking," "sharing workout results via social networks," "digital avatar and coach," and "rewards" were generally perceived negatively and considered as useless and not motivating. In general, participants preferred features with an easy-to-navigate interface and a clear, simplistic, and straightforward layout with a modern design. Customization and personalization qualities were highly appreciated throughout an app, together with data precision.
CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the understanding of the features and components preferred by adolescents in apps promoting PA. Such apps should provide users with precise data, and have a simplistic modern design and a straightforward easy-to-use interface. Apps should be personalized and customizable. Desired features to be included in an app are goal setting and planning, feedback, coaching and training programs, and activity tracking. The features should involve high levels of data precision and timely delivery while taking into consideration the real-life context.
Disciplines :
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
DOMIN, Alex ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences > Team Claus VÖGELE
OUZZAHRA, Yacine ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Social Sciences (DSOC) > DSOC Administration
AD was supported by an Industrial Fellowship from the Luxembourg National Research Fund (reference number 12674722) and by Actimage Luxembourg SA. The authors are grateful for the support of the graduate psychology student Tabea Franziska Schmidt-Alkadri in the coding and categorization process.
OECD, European Union. Health at a Glance: Europe 2020: State of Health in the EU Cycle. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2020. URL: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-europe-2020_82129230-en
OECD, European Union. Health at a Glance: Europe 2016: State of Health in the EU Cycle. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016. URL: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-europe-2016_9789264265592-en
WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World Health Organization. 2020. URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128 [accessed 2022-05-25]
National Institute for Health Innovation. A National Survey of Children and Young People’s Physical Activity and Dietary Behaviours in New Zealand: 2008/09. Ministry of Health. 2010. URL: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/cyp-physical-activity-dietary-behaviours-08-09-keyfindgs.pdf [accessed 2022-05-25]
Bhatti SN, Watkin E, Butterfill J, Li J. Recognition of 16-18-year-old adolescents for guiding physical activity interventions: A cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 Jul 11;17(14):5002 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145002] [Medline: 32664602]
Being young in Europe today - digital world. Eurostat. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Being_young_in_Europe_today_-_digital_world [accessed 2022-05-25]
Harari GM, Lane ND, Wang R, Crosier BS, Campbell AT, Gosling SD. Using smartphones to collect behavioral data in psychological science: Opportunities, practical considerations, and challenges. Perspect Psychol Sci 2016 Nov;11(6):838-854 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1177/1745691616650285] [Medline: 27899727]
Schoeppe S, Alley S, Rebar AL, Hayman M, Bray NA, Van Lippevelde W, et al. Apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children and adolescents: a review of quality, features and behaviour change techniques. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017 Jun 24;14(1):83 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0538-3] [Medline: 28646889]
Domin A, Spruijt-Metz D, Theisen D, Ouzzahra Y, Vögele C. Smartphone-based interventions for physical activity promotion: Scoping review of the evidence over the last 10 years. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021 Jul 21;9(7):e24308 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/24308] [Medline: 34287209]
Rabin C, Bock B. Desired features of smartphone applications promoting physical activity. Telemed J E Health 2011 Dec;17(10):801-803. [doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0055] [Medline: 22010977]
Ehlers DK, Huberty JL. Middle-aged women's preferred theory-based features in mobile physical activity applications. J Phys Act Health 2014 Sep;11(7):1379-1385. [doi: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0435] [Medline: 24368818]
Middelweerd A, van der Laan DM, van Stralen MM, Mollee JS, Stuij M, te Velde SJ, et al. What features do Dutch university students prefer in a smartphone application for promotion of physical activity? A qualitative approach. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015 Mar 01;12:31 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0189-1] [Medline: 25889577]
Baretta D, Perski O, Steca P. Exploring users' experiences of the uptake and adoption of physical activity apps: Longitudinal qualitative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 Feb 08;7(2):e11636 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/11636] [Medline: 30735143]
Dennison L, Morrison L, Conway G, Yardley L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2013 Apr 18;15(4):e86 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2583] [Medline: 23598614]
Miyamoto SW, Henderson S, Young HM, Pande A, Han JJ. Tracking health data is not enough: A qualitative exploration of the role of healthcare partnerships and mHealth technology to promote physical activity and to sustain behavior change. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016 Jan 20;4(1):e5 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4814] [Medline: 26792225]
Gowin M, Cheney M, Gwin S, Franklin Wann T. Health and fitness app use in college students: A qualitative study. American Journal of Health Education 2015 Jul 06;46(4):223-230. [doi: 10.1080/19325037.2015.1044140]
Chang T, Kaasinen E, Kaipainen K. What influences users' decisions to take apps into use?: a framework for evaluating persuasive and engaging design in mobile Apps for well-being. In: MUM '12: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 2012 Presented at: 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia; December 4-6, 2012; Ulm, Germany p. 1-10. [doi: 10.1145/2406367.2406370]
Kowalski K, Crocker P, Donen R. The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A) Manual. University of Saskatchewan. 2004. URL: https://www.prismsports.org/UserFiles/file/PAQ_manual_ScoringandPDF.pdf [accessed 2022-05-25]
Aggio D, Fairclough S, Knowles Z, Graves L. Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents. Arch Public Health 2016 Jan 22;74(1):3 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0115-2] [Medline: 26807217]
Breen RL. A practical guide to focus-group research. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 2006 Nov;30(3):463-475. [doi: 10.1080/03098260600927575]
Lubans DR, Smith JJ, Skinner G, Morgan PJ. Development and implementation of a smartphone application to promote physical activity and reduce screen-time in adolescent boys. Front Public Health 2014;2:42 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00042] [Medline: 24904909]
Seah MLC, Koh KT. The efficacy of using mobile applications in changing adolescent girls’ physical activity behaviour during weekends. European Physical Education Review 2020 Jun 17;27(1):113-131. [doi: 10.1177/1356336x20930741]