[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Attentional processing of pain has been theorized to play a key role in the severity of pain and associated disability. In particular attentional bias towards pain information, resulting in poor pain outcomes, has been extensively researched. Recently, the idea was put forward that attention bias malleability (AM), i.e., the readiness to acquire an attentional bias irrespective of its direction, may be key in predicting poor pain outcomes. We tested this hypothesis in two studies.
METHODS: In Study 1, 55 healthy participants completed an AM paradigm, followed by an experimental heat pain paradigm probing pain experience and pain-related task interference. In Study 2, 71 people with chronic pain completed an AM paradigm and questionnaires probing pain experience and associated disability.
RESULTS: In Study 1, including healthy participants, no relationship was found between AM indices and experimental pain outcomes. In Study 2, including chronic pain patients, results indicated that higher levels of overall AM were related to higher levels of pain experience and disability.
CONCLUSION: This study partially supports the hypotheses that the degree to which individuals can adapt their attentional preference in line with changing environmental conditions is associated with poor pain outcomes. However, future research is needed to clarify inconsistent findings between healthy volunteers and chronic pain patients as well as to determine the causal status of AM in poor pain outcomes.
Disciplines :
Traitement & psychologie clinique
Auteur, co-auteur :
Mac Goris, Justine L ✱; Department of Clinical Psychological Science, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands
Todd, Jemma; School Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Clarke, Patrick J F; Curtin School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University of Technology, Curtin, Australia
Hughes, Alicia M; Department of Psychological Medecine, King's College London, University of London, London, United Kingdom
VÖGELE, Claus ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Health and Behaviour
Van Ryckeghem, Dimitri M L ✱; Department of Clinical Psychological Science, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands ; Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg ; Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
✱ Ces auteurs ont contribué de façon équivalente à la publication.
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
The role of attention bias malleability in experiencing pain and associated disability.
Justine MacGoris and Dimitri Van Ryckeghem are supported by funding from FNR Core Junior programme (Painflex; Nr. 12671141). Dimitri Van Ryckeghem is an investigator on ARC Discovery Project DP210101827. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.The following grant information was disclosed by the authors: FNR Core Junior programme: 12671141. ARC Discovery Project: DP210101827.
Abudoush AN, Noureen A, Panagioti M, Poliakoff E, Van Ryckeghem DML, Hodkinson A, Husain N. 2023. What can we learn about selective attention processes in individuals with chronic pain using reaction time task? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 164(2):1677–1692 DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002885.
Antony MM, Bieling PJ, Cox BJ, Enns MW, R Swinson. 1998. Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment 10(2):176–181 DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176.
Carleton RN, Asmundson GJG, Korol SL, LeBouthillier DM, Hozempa K, Katz JD, Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G. 2020. Evaluating the efficacy of an attention modification program for patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Pain 161(3):584–594 DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001746.
Clarke P, Chen N, Guastella A. 2012. Prepared for the best: readiness to modify attentional processing and reduction in anxiety vulnerability in response to therapy. Emotion 12:487–494 DOI 10.1037/a0025592.
Clarke P, MacLeod C, Shirazee N. 2008. Prepared for the worst: readiness to acquire threat bias and susceptibility to elevate trait anxiety. Emotion 8:47–57 DOI 10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.47.
Colster AT, Rhodes HM, Navy D, Klotsche J, Senior A, Kunik M, Wilson N, Stanley MA. 2008. Psychometric properties of the depression anxiety stress scale 21 in older primary care patients. Journal of Affective Disorders 110(3):248–259 DOI 10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.23.
Crombez G, De Paepe AL, Veirman E, Eccleston C, Verleysen G, Van Ryckeghem DML. 2020. Let’s talk about pain catastrophizing measures: an item content analysis. PeerJournal Life & Environment 8:e8643 DOI 10.7717/peerj.8643.
Crombez G, Eccleston C, Van Damme S, Vlayen JWS, Karoly P. 2012. Fear-avoidance model of chronic pain: the next generation. The Clinical Journal of Pain 28(6):475–483 DOI 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182385392.
Crombez G, Lauwerier E, Goubert L, Van Damme S. 2016. Goal pursuit in individuals with chronic pain: a personal project analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 7:966 DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00966.
Crombez G, Van Ryckeghem DML, Eccleston C, Van Damme S. 2013. Attentional bias to pain-related information: a meta-analysis. Pain 154(4):497–510 DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.013.
Dear BF, Shapre L, Nicholas MK, Refshauge K. 2011a. Pain-related attentional bias: the importance of the Personal Relevance and ecological validity of stimuli. Journal of Pain 12(6):625–632 DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.11.010.
Dear BF, Shapre L, Nicholas MK, Refshauge K. 2011b. The psychometric properties of the dot-probe paradigm when used in pain-related attentional bias research. The Journal of Pain 12(12):1247–1254 DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.07.003.
Eccleston C, Crombez G. 2007. Worry and chronic Pain: a misdirected problem solving model. Pain 132(2):233–236 DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2007.09.014.
Franklin ZC, Holmes PS, Fowler NE. 2019. Eye gaze markers indicated visual attention to threatening images in individuals with chronic back pain. Journal of Clinical Medicine 8(1):31 DOI 10.3390/jcm8010031.
Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC. 2007. The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin 133(4):581–624 DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.581.
Jackson T, Yang Z, Su L. 2019. Pain-related gaze biases and later functioning among adults with chronic pain: a longitudinal eye-tracking study. Pain 160(10):2221–2228 DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001614.
Lester KJ, Lisk SC, Carr E, Patrick F, Eley CT. 2019. Association between attentional bias and interpretation bias and change in school concerns and anxiety symptoms duirng the transition from primary to secondary school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 47:1521–1532 DOI 10.1007/s10802-019-00528-3.
Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. 1995. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the depression anxiety stress scale with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy 33(3):335–343 DOI 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u.
Michaelides A, Zis P. 2019. Depression, anxiety and acute pain: links and management challenges. Postgraduate Medecine 131(7):438–444 DOI 10.1080/00325481.2019.1663705.
Notebaert L, Clarke PJF, Grafton B, MacLeod C. 2015. Validation of a novel attention bias modification task: the future may be in the cards. Behaviour Research and Therapy 65:93–100 DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2014.12.007.
Pallier C, New B, Bourgin J. 2019. Openlexicon (GitHub repository). Available at https://github.com/chrplr/openlexicon.
Peer E, Brandimarte L, Samat S, Acquisiti A. 2017. Beyond the turk: alternative platforms for crowdsourcing behavioral research. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70:153–163 DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.006.
Price T, Dussor G. 2014. Evolution: the advantage of ‘Maladaptive’ pain plasticity. Current Biology 24:384–386 DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.011.
R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.
Schoth DE, Delgado Nunes V, Liossi C. 2012. Attentional bias toward pain related information in chronic pain; a meta-analysis of visual-probe investigation. Clinical Psychology Review 32(1):13–25 DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.004.
Schrooten MGS, Vlayen JWS. 2010. Becoming active again? Further thoughts on goal pursuit in chronic pain. Pain 149(3):422–423 DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2010.02.038.
Schrooten M, Vlayen JWS, Morley S. 2012. Psychological interventions for chronic pain: reviewed within the context of goal pursuit. Pain Management 2(2):141–150 DOI 10.2217/pmt.12.2.
Sharpe L, Ianiello M, Dear FB, Nicholson Perry K, Refshauge K, Nicholas MK. 2012. Is there a potential role for attention bias modification in pain patient? Results of 2 randomized, controlled trials. Pain 153(3):722–731 DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2011.12.014.
Smith BA, Penny KI, Puves AM, Munro C, Wilson B, Grimshaw J, Chambers AW, Smith CW. 1997. The chronic pain grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain 7(2):141–147 DOI 10.1016/S0304-3959(97)03347-2.
Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. 1995. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychological Assessment 7(4):524–532 DOI 10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524.
Taylor CT, Bomyea J, Amir N. 2011. Malleability of attentional bias for positive emotional information and anxiety vulnerability. Emotion 11(1):127–138 DOI 10.1037/a0021301.
Todd J, Clarke JFP, Hughes MA, Van Ryckeghem D. 2023. Attentional bias malleability as a predictor of daily pain interference. Pain 164(3):598–604 DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002744.
Todd J, Sharpe L, Colagiuri B. 2016. Attentional bias modification and pain: the role of sensory and affective stimuli. Behaviour Research and Therapy 83:53–61 DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.002.
Todd J, Sharpe L, Johnson A, Perry KN, Colagiuri B, Dear BF. 2015. Towards a new model of attentional bias in the development, maintenance, and management of pain. Pain 156(9):1589–1600 DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000214.
Todd J, Van Ryckeghem D, Sharpe L, Crombez G. 2018. Attentional bias to pain-related information: a meta-analysis of dot-probes studies. Health Psychology Review 12(4):419–436 DOI 10.1080/17437199.2018.1521729.
Van Damme S, Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Goubert L, Van Houdenhove B. 2002. A confirmatory factor analysis of the pain catastrophizing scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical population. Pain 96(3):319–324 DOI 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00463-8.
Van Damme S, Legrain V, Vogt J, Crombez G. 2010. Keeping pain in mind: a motivational account of attention to pain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 34(2):204–213 DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.01.005.
Van Ryckeghem D, Crombez G. 2018. Pain and attention: towards a motivational account. In: Karoly P, Crombez G, eds. Motivational perspectives on chronic pain: theory, research and practice. New-York: Oxford University Press, 211–245.
Van Ryckeghem D, Crombez G, Goubert L, De Houwer J, Onraedt T, Van Damme S. 2013. The predictive value of Attentional Bias toward pain-related information in chronic pain patients: a diary study. Pain 154(3):468–475 DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2012.12.008.
Van Ryckeghem D, Noel M, Sharpe L, Pincus T, Van Damme S. 2019. Cognitive bias in pain: an integrated functional-contextual framework. Pain 160:1489–1493 DOI 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001508.
Van Ryckeghem DML, Van Damme S, Vervoort T. 2018. Does attention bias modification training impact on task performance in the context of pain: an experimental study in healthy participants. PLOS ONE 13(7):e0200629 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0200629.
Vandierendonck A, De Vooght G, Van der Goten K. 1998. Interfering with the central executive by means of a random interval repetition task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 51:197–218 DOI 10.1080/713755748.
Verhoeven K, Crombez G, Eccleston C, Van Ryckeghem DML, Morley S, Damme SVan. 2010. The role of motivation in distracting attention away from pain: an experimental study. Pain 149:229–234 DOI 10.1016/j.pain.2010.01.019.
Verhoeven K, Van Damme S, Eccleston C, Van Ryckeghem DML, Legrain V, Crombez G. 2011. Distraction from pain and executive functioning: an experimental investigation of the role of inhibition, task switching and working memory. European Journal of Pain 15(8):866–873 DOI 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.01.009.
Vermeir JF, White MJ, Jonhson D, Crombez G, Van Ryckeghem DML. 2022. Gamified web-delivered attentional bias training for adults with chronic pain: protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo trial. JMIR Research Protocol 11(1):332–359 DOI 10.2196/32359.
Vermeir JF, White MJ, Johnson D, Crombez G, Van Ryckeghem DML. 2023. Development and evaluation of linguistic stimuli for pain research. The Journal of Pain 24(10):1843–1858 DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.05.011.
Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. 1992. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 50(2):133–149 DOI 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4.
