Request a copy

Full Text

• Arbour, D., Garant, D., Jensen, D.: Inferring network effects from observational data. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 715–724 (2016)
• Bakshy, E., Eckles, D., Yan, R., Rosenn, I.: Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 146–161 (2012)
• Betlei, A., Diemert, E., Amini, M.R.: Uplift modeling with generalization guarantees. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 55–65 (2021)
• Cer, D., et al.: Universal sentence encoder (2018). arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.11175
• Chen, H., Harinen, T., Lee, J.Y., Yung, M., Zhao, Z.: CausalML: Python package for causal machine learning (2020). arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.11631
• Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W.: Double/Debiased/Neyman machine learning of treatment effects. Am. Econ. Rev. 107(5), 261–265 (2017)
• Chu, Z., Rathbun, S.L., Li, S.: Graph infomax adversarial learning for treatment effect estimation with networked observational data. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 176–184 (2021)
• Cortez, M., Eichhorn, M., Yu, C.: Staggered rollout designs enable causal inference under interference without network knowledge. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 7437–7449 (2022)
• Cristali, I., Veitch, V.: Using embeddings for causal estimation of peer influence in social networks. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 15616–15628 (2022)
• Dawid, A.P.: Conditional independence in statistical theory. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat Methodol. 41(1), 1–15 (1979)
• Devriendt, F., Moldovan, D., Verbeke, W.: A literature survey and experimental evaluation of the state-of-the-art in uplift modeling: a stepping stone toward the development of prescriptive analytics. Big Data 6(1), 13–41 (2018)
• Diemert, E., Betlei, A., Renaudin, C., Amini, M.R.: A large scale benchmark for uplift modeling. In: Proceedings of the KDD Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Computational Advertising (2018)
• Fan, W., et al.: Graph neural networks for social recommendation. In: Proceeding of the 28th ACM Web Conference, pp. 417–426. ACM (2019)
• Farzam, A., Tannenbaum, A., Sapiro, G.: Curvature and causal inference in network data. In: Causal Representation Learning Workshop at NeurIPS 2023 (2023)
• Gal, Y., Ghahramani, Z.: Dropout as a bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1050–1059. PMLR (2016)
• Garivier, A., Moulines, E.: On upper-confidence bound policies for switching bandit problems. In: Kivinen, J., Szepesvári, C., Ukkonen, E., Zeugmann, T. (eds.) ALT 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6925, pp. 174–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24412-4_16
• Gilhuber, S., Busch, J., Rotthues, D., Frey, C.M.M., Seidl, T.: DiffusAL: coupling active learning with graph diffusion for label-efficient node classification. In: Koutra, D., Plant, C., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Baralis, E., Bonchi, F. (eds.) Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Research Track. ECML PKDD 2023. LNCS(), vol. 14169. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43412-9_5
• Graff, D.E., Shakhnovich, E.I., Coley, C.W.: Accelerating high-throughput virtual screening through molecular pool-based active learning. Chem. Sci. 12(22), 7866–7881 (2021)
• Gui, H., Xu, Y., Bhasin, A., Han, J.: Network a/b testing: From sampling to estimation. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 399–409 (2015)
• Guo, R., Li, J., Liu, H.: Learning individual causal effects from networked observational data. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 232–240 (2020)
• Gutierrez, P., Gérardy, J.Y.: Causal inference and uplift modelling: a review of the literature. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Predictive Applications and APIs, pp. 1–13. PMLR (2017)
• Hamilton, W., Ying, Z., Leskovec, J.: Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (2017)
• Hartford, J., Lewis, G., Leyton-Brown, K., Taddy, M.: Deep IV: a flexible approach for counterfactual prediction. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1414–1423. PMLR (2017)
• He, X., Deng, K., Wang, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, M.: LightGCN: simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 639–648. ACM (2020)
• Huang, K., Jin, Y., Candes, E., Leskovec, J.: Uncertainty quantification over graph with conformalized graph neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36 (2023)
• Jiang, S., Sun, Y.: Estimating causal effects on networked observational data via representation learning. In: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp. 852–861 (2022)
• Johansson, F., Shalit, U., Sontag, D.: Learning representations for counterfactual inference. In: Proceedings of the 33rdh International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3020–3029. PMLR (2016)
• Karrer, B., et al.: Network experimentation at scale. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 3106–3116 (2021)
• Kennedy, E.H.: Towards optimal doubly robust estimation of heterogeneous causal effects. Electron. J. Stat. 17(2), 3008–3049 (2023)
• Kipf, T.N., Welling, M.: Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907
• Künzel, S.R., Sekhon, J.S., Bickel, P.J., Yu, B.: Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116(10), 4156–4165 (2019)
• Lee, B.K., Lessler, J., Stuart, E.A.: Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning. Stat. Med. 29(3), 337–346 (2010)
• Lin, X., Zhang, G., Lu, X., Bao, H., Takeuchi, K., Kashima, H.: Estimating treatment effects under heterogeneous interference. In: Koutra, D., Plant, C., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Baralis, E., Bonchi, F. (eds.) Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Research Track. ECML PKDD 2023. LNCS(), vol. 14169. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43412-9_34
• Louizos, C., Shalit, U., Mooij, J.M., Sontag, D., Zemel, R., Welling, M.: Causal effect inference with deep latent-variable models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (2017)
• Ma, J., Guo, R., Chen, C., Zhang, A., Li, J.: Deconfounding with networked observational data in a dynamic environment. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 166–174 (2021)
• Ma, J., Wan, M., Yang, L., Li, J., Hecht, B., Teevan, J.: Learning causal effects on hypergraphs. In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 1202–1212 (2022)
• Ma, Y., Tresp, V.: Causal inference under networked interference and intervention policy enhancement. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 3700–3708. PMLR (2021)
• Olaya, D., Verbeke, W., Van Belle, J., Guerry, M.A.: To do or not to do: cost-sensitive causal decision-making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 305(2), 838–852 (2023)
• Panagopoulos, G., Tziortziotis, N., Vazirgiannis, M., Malliaros, F.: Maximizing influence with graph neural networks. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 237–244 (2023)
• Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)
• Radcliffe, N.: Using control groups to target on predicted lift: building and assessing uplift model. Dir. Mark. Anal. J. 14–21 (2007)
• Radcliffe, N.J., Surry, P.D.: Real-world uplift modelling with significance-based uplift trees. White Paper TR-2011-1, Stochastic Solutions, pp. 1–33 (2011)
• Rafla, M., Voisine, N., Crémilleux, B.: Evaluation of Uplift Models with Non-Random Assignment Bias. In: Bouadi, T., Fromont, E., Hüllermeier, E. (eds.) IDA 2022. LNCS, vol. 13205, pp. 251–263. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01333-1_20
• Rubin, D.B.: Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 66(5), 688 (1974)
• Rubin, D.B.: Causal inference using potential outcomes: design, modeling, decisions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100(469), 322–331 (2005)
• Rudaś, K., Jaroszewicz, S.: Regularization for uplift regression. In: Koutra, D., Plant, C., Gomez Rodriguez, M., Baralis, E., Bonchi, F. (eds.) Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: Research Track. ECML PKDD 2023. LNCS(), vol. 14169. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43412-9_35
• Russo, D.J., Van Roy, B., Kazerouni, A., Osband, I., Wen, Z., et al.: A tutorial on Thompson sampling. Found. Trends® Mach. Learn. 11(1), 1–96 (2018)
• Rzepakowski, P., Jaroszewicz, S.: Decision trees for uplift modeling with single and multiple treatments. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 32, 303–327 (2012)
• Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey (2009)
• Shalit, U., Johansson, F.D., Sontag, D.: Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3076–3085. PMLR (2017)
• Shi, C., Blei, D., Veitch, V.: Adapting neural networks for the estimation of treatment effects. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (2019)
• Sołtys, M., Jaroszewicz, S.: Boosting algorithms for uplift modeling (2018). arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.07909
• Stadler, M., Charpentier, B., Geisler, S., Zügner, D., Günnemann, S.: Graph posterior network: Bayesian predictive uncertainty for node classification. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 18033–18048 (2021)
• Tye, H.: Application of statistical ‘design of experiments’ methods in drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 9(11), 485–491 (2004)
• Ugander, J., Karrer, B., Backstrom, L., Kleinberg, J.: Graph cluster randomization: network exposure to multiple universes. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 329–337 (2013)
• Vanderschueren, T., Verbeke, W., Moraes, F., Proença, H.M.: Metalearners for ranking treatment effects (2024). arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.02183
• Veitch, V., Wang, Y., Blei, D.: Using embeddings to correct for unobserved confounding in networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32 (2019)
• Verhelst, T., Petit, R., Verbeke, W., Bontempi, G.: Uplift vs. predictive modeling: a theoretical analysis (2023). arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.12036
• Wager, S., Athey, S.: Estimation and inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using random forests. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 113(523), 1228–1242 (2018)
• Wang, X., He, X., Wang, M., Feng, F., Chua, T.: Neural graph collaborative filtering. In: SIGIR, pp. 165–174. ACM (2019)
• Wei, K., Iyer, R., Bilmes, J.: Submodularity in data subset selection and active learning. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1954–1963. PMLR (2015)
• Wright, D.B.: Comparing groups in a before-after design: when t test and ANCOVA produce different results. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 76(3), 663–675 (2006)
• Wu, Y., Xu, Y., Singh, A., Yang, Y., Dubrawski, A.: Active learning for graph neural networks via node feature propagation (2019). arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.07567