Keywords :
Amyloid beta-Peptides; Biomarkers; Peptide Fragments; amyloid beta-protein (1-42); tau Proteins; Alzheimer Disease/cerebrospinal fluid/diagnosis; Amyloid beta-Peptides/cerebrospinal fluid; Biomarkers/cerebrospinal fluid; Chemistry, Clinical/standards; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/standards; Humans; Laboratories, Hospital/standards; Peptide Fragments/cerebrospinal fluid; Phosphorylation; Quality Control; Reproducibility of Results; Societies, Medical/standards; tau Proteins/cerebrospinal fluid
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers amyloid beta 1-42, total tau, and phosphorylated tau are used increasingly for Alzheimer's disease (AD) research and patient management. However, there are large variations in biomarker measurements among and within laboratories. METHODS: Data from the first nine rounds of the Alzheimer's Association quality control program was used to define the extent and sources of analytical variability. In each round, three CSF samples prepared at the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory (Mölndal, Sweden) were analyzed by single-analyte enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a multiplexing xMAP assay, or an immunoassay with electrochemoluminescence detection. RESULTS: A total of 84 laboratories participated. Coefficients of variation (CVs) between laboratories were around 20% to 30%; within-run CVs, less than 5% to 10%; and longitudinal within-laboratory CVs, 5% to 19%. Interestingly, longitudinal within-laboratory CV differed between biomarkers at individual laboratories, suggesting that a component of it was assay dependent. Variability between kit lots and between laboratories both had a major influence on amyloid beta 1-42 measurements, but for total tau and phosphorylated tau, between-kit lot effects were much less than between-laboratory effects. Despite the measurement variability, the between-laboratory consistency in classification of samples (using prehoc-derived cutoffs for AD) was high (>90% in 15 of 18 samples for ELISA and in 12 of 18 samples for xMAP). CONCLUSIONS: The overall variability remains too high to allow assignment of universal biomarker cutoff values for a specific intended use. Each laboratory must ensure longitudinal stability in its measurements and use internally qualified cutoff levels. Further standardization of laboratory procedures and improvement of kit performance will likely increase the usefulness of CSF AD biomarkers for researchers and clinicians.
Mattsson, Niklas; Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden. niklas.mattsson@neuro.gu.se
Andreasson, Ulf
Persson, Staffan
Carrillo, Maria C
Collins, Steven
Chalbot, Sonia
Cutler, Neal
Dufour-Rainfray, Diane
Fagan, Anne M
Heegaard, Niels H H
Robin Hsiung, Ging-Yuek
Hyman, Bradley
Iqbal, Khalid
Kaeser, Stephan A
Lachno, D Richard
Lleó, Alberto
Lewczuk, Piotr
Molinuevo, José L
Parchi, Piero
Regeniter, Axel
Rissman, Robert A
Rosenmann, Hanna
Sancesario, Giuseppe
Schröder, Johannes
Shaw, Leslie M
Teunissen, Charlotte E
Trojanowski, John Q
Vanderstichele, Hugo
Vandijck, Manu
Verbeek, Marcel M
Zetterberg, Henrik
Blennow, Kaj
Alzheimer's Association QC Program Work, Group
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
124