Article (Scientific journals)
Safety and efficacy of rasagiline as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
Ludolph, Albert C; Schuster, Joachim; Dorst, Johannes et al.
2018In The Lancet Neurology, 17 (8), p. 681 - 688
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Safety and efficacy of rasagiline as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.pdf
Publisher postprint (264.96 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Indans; Neuroprotective Agents; rasagiline; Riluzole; Aged; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis/drug therapy; Body Mass Index; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Indans/therapeutic use; Male; Middle Aged; Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use; Retrospective Studies; Riluzole/therapeutic use; Treatment Outcome; Vital Capacity/drug effects; Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis; Vital Capacity; Neurology (clinical)
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: Rasagiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor with neuroprotective potential in Parkinson's disease, has shown a disease-modifying effect in the SOD1-Gly93Ala low-expressing mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, both alone and in combination with riluzole. We sought to test whether or not rasagiline 1 mg/day can prolong survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis also receiving riluzole. METHODS: Patients with possible, probable, or definite amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were enrolled to our randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind, phase 2 trial from 15 German network for motor neuron diseases (MND-NET) centres (university hospitals or clinics). Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years, had onset of progressive weakness within the 36 months before the study, had disease duration of more than 6 months and less than 3 years, and had a best-sitting slow vital capacity of at least 50%. After a 4-week screening period, eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either rasagiline (1 mg/day) or placebo in addition to riluzole (100 mg/day), after stratification for site of onset (bulbar or spinal) and study centre. Patients and all personnel assessing outcome parameters were masked to treatment allocation. Patients were followed up 2, 6, 12, and 18 months after randomisation. The primary endpoint was survival time, defined as the time to death or time to study cutoff date (ie, the last patient's last visit plus 14 days). Analyses of primary outcome and safety measures were done in all patients who received at least one dose of trial treatment (intention-to-treat population). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01879241. FINDINGS: Between July 2, 2013, and Nov 11, 2014, 273 patients were screened for eligibility, and 252 patients were randomly assigned to receive rasagiline (n=127) or placebo (n=125). 126 patients taking rasagiline and 125 taking placebo were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. For the primary outcome, the survival probability at the end of the study was 0·43 (95% CI 0·25-0·59) in the rasagiline group (n=126) and 0·53 (0·43-0·62) in the placebo group (n=125). The estimated effect size (hazard ratio) was 0·91 (one-sided 97·5% CI -infinity to 1·34; p=0·31). Rasagiline was well tolerated, and most adverse events were due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis disease progression rather than treatment; the most frequent of these were dysphagia (32 [25%] taking rasagiline vs 24 [19%] taking placebo) and respiratory failure (25 [20%] vs 31 [25%]). Frequency of adverse events were comparable between both groups. INTERPRETATION: Rasagiline was safe in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. There was no difference between groups in the primary outcome of survival, although post-hoc analysis suggested that rasagiline might modify disease progression in patients with an initial slope of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised greater than 0·5 points per month at baseline. This should be confirmed in another clinical trial. FUNDING: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries.
Disciplines :
Neurology
Author, co-author :
Ludolph, Albert C ;  Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: albert.ludolph@rku.de
Schuster, Joachim ;  Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Dorst, Johannes;  Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Dupuis, Luc;  Inserm, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
Dreyhaupt, Jens;  Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Weishaupt, Jochen H;  Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Kassubek, Jan;  Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Weiland, Ulrike;  Department of Neurology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Petri, Susanne;  Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Meyer, Thomas;  Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldtuniversität, Berlin, Germany
Grosskreutz, Julian;  Department of Neurology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
Schrank, Berthold;  Department of Neurology, DKD HELIOS Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
Boentert, Matthias;  Department of Sleep Medicine and Neuromuscular Diseases, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
Emmer, Alexander;  Department of Neurology, University Hospital Halle, Germany
Hermann, Andreas;  Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
Zeller, Daniel;  Department of Neurology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Prudlo, Johannes;  Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
Winkler, Andrea S;  Department of Neurology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Grehl, Torsten;  Department of Neurology, University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Bochum, Germany
HENEKA, Michael  ;  Department of Neurology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Wollebæk Johannesen, Siw;  Department of Neurology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
Göricke, Bettina;  Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
RAS-ALS Study Group
More authors (13 more) Less
 These authors have contributed equally to this work.
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Safety and efficacy of rasagiline as an add-on therapy to riluzole in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.
Publication date :
August 2018
Journal title :
The Lancet Neurology
ISSN :
1474-4422
eISSN :
1474-4465
Publisher :
Elsevier Ltd, England
Volume :
17
Issue :
8
Pages :
681 - 688
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen
Funding text :
Acknowledgments, We thank the study patients and their families, participating staff at the study centres, members of the data safety monitoring board (Jan Kassubek, Martin Hecht, Jan Beyersmann), members of the steering committee (Reinhard Dengler and Stephan Zierz), and personnel of the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, University Medical Center Mainz (CRO services), and the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE). This study was partially financed by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Participating trial sites of the RAS-ALS Study Group are listed in theappendix.We thank the study patients and their families, participating staff at the study centres, members of the data safety monitoring board (Jan Kassubek, Martin Hecht, Jan Beyersmann), members of the steering committee (Reinhard Dengler and Stephan Zierz), and personnel of the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials, University Medical Center Mainz (CRO services), and the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE). This study was partially financed by Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Participating trial sites of the RAS-ALS Study Group are listed in the appendix .
Available on ORBilu :
since 07 May 2024

Statistics


Number of views
1 (0 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
1 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
49
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
34
OpenCitations
 
71
WoS citations
 
40

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu