Download

Full Text

2023-1343.pdf

Author postprint (1.07 MB)

Download

• Abelson, H., Anderson, R.J., Bellovin, S.M., et al.: Keys under doormats: mandating insecurity by requiring government access to all data and communications. J. Cybersecur. 1(1), 69–79 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyv009
• Arfaoui, G., et al.: How to (legally) keep secrets from mobile operators. In: Bertino, E., Shulman, H., Waidner, M. (eds.) ESORICS 2021. LNCS, vol. 12972, pp. 23–43. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88418-5 2
• Backes, M., Camenisch, J., Sommer, D.: Anonymous yet accountable access control. In: Atluri, V., di Vimercati, S.D.C., Dingledine, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, WPES 2005, Alexandria, VA, USA, 7 November 2005, pp. 40–46. ACM (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1102199.1102208
• Backes, M., Hofheinz, D.: How to break and repair a universally composable signature functionality. In: Zhang, K., Zheng, Y. (eds.) ISC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3225, pp. 61–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30144-8 6
• Badertscher, C., Maurer, U., Tschudi, D., Zikas, V.: Bitcoin as a transaction ledger: a composable treatment. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2017/149. https://ia. cr/2017/149.2017
• Bates, A.M., Butler, K.R.B., Sherr, M., et al.: Accountable wiretapping-or-I know they can hear you now. In: NDSS 2012. The Internet Society, February 2012
• Bellare, M., Rivest, R.L.: Translucent cryptography—an alternative to key escrow, and its implementation via fractional oblivious transfer. J. Cryptol. 12(2), 117–139 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00003819
• Benhamouda, F., Gentry, C., Gorbunov, S., Halevi, S., Krawczyk, H., Lin, C., Rabin, T., Reyzin, L.: Can a public blockchain keep a secret? In: Pass, R., Pietrzak, K. (eds.) TCC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12550, pp. 260–290. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64375-1 10
• Brickell, E.F., Gemmell, P., Kravitz, D.W.: Trustee-based tracing extensions to anonymous cash and the making of anonymous change. In: Clarkson, K.L. (ed.) 6th SODA. ACM-SIAM, Janurary 1995, pp. 457–466 (1995)
• Brorsson, J., David, B., Gentile, L., Pagnin, E., Wagner, P.S.: PAPR: publicly auditable privacy revocation for anonymous credentials. In: Rosulek, M. (ed.) CT-RSA 2023. LNCS, vol. 13871, pp. 163–190. Springer, Cham (2023). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-031-30872-7 7
• Camenisch, J., Enderlein, R.R., Krenn, S., Küsters, R., Rausch, D.: Universal composition with responsive environments. In: Cheon, J.H., Takagi, T. (eds.) ASI-ACRYPT 2016, Part II. LNCS, vol. 10032, pp. 807–840. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53890-6 27
• Campanelli, M., David, B., Khoshakhlagh, H., Konring, A., Nielsen, J.B.: Encryption to the future: a paradigm for sending secret messages to future (anonymous) committees. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2021/1423 (2021). https://eprint. iacr.org/2021/1423
• Campanelli, M., David, B., Khoshakhlagh, H., Konring, A., Nielsen, J.B.: Encryption to the future. In: Agrawal, S., Lin, D. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2022. LNCS, vol. 13793, pp. 151–180. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22969-5 6
• Canetti, R.: Universally composable security. J. ACM 67(5) 28:1–28:94 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3402457
• Canetti, R.: Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2000/067. https://ia.cr/2000/067. 2000
• Canetti, R.: Universally composable signature, certification, and authentication. In: CSFW, p. 219. IEEE Computer Society (2004)
• Cascudo, I., David, B., Garms, L., Konring, A.: YOLO YOSO: fast and simple encryption and secret sharing in the YOSO model. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2022/242 (2022). https://ia.cr/2022/242
• Council of the European Union: Council Resolution on Encryption-Security through encryption and security despite encryption. https://data.consilium. europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13084-2020-REV-1/en/pdf.2020
• Daza, V., Haque, A., Scafuro, A., Zacharakis, A., Zapico, A.: Mutual accountability layer: accountable anonymity within accountable trust. In: Dolev, S., Katz, J., Meisels, A. (eds.) CSCML 2022. LNCS, vol. 13301, pp. 318–336. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07689-3 24
• Erwig, A., Faust, S., Riahi, S.: Large-scale non-interactive threshold cryptosystems through anonymity. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2021/1290. https://eprint. iacr.org/2021/1290.2021
• Fetzer, V., Klooß, M., Müller-Quade, J., Raiber, M., Rupp, A.: Universally composable auditable surveillance. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Paper 2023/1343 (2023). https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1343
• Frankle, J., Park, S., Shaar, D., Goldwasser, S., Weitzner, D.J.: Practical accountability of secret processes. In: Enck, W., Felt, A.P. (eds.) USENIX Security 2018, pp. 657–674. USENIX Association, August 2018
• Garg, S., Gentry, C., Halevi, S., Wichs, D.: On the implausibility of differing-inputs obfuscation and extractable witness encryption with auxiliary input. In: Garay, J.A., Gennaro, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8616, pp. 518–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44371-2 29
• Garman, C., Green, M., Miers, I.: Accountable privacy for decentralized anonymous payments. In: Grossklags, J., Preneel, B. (eds.) FC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9603, pp. 81– 98. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54970-4 5
• Gentry, C., et al.: YOSO: you only speak once. In: Malkin, T., Peikert, C. (eds.) CRYPTO 2021, Part II. LNCS, vol. 12826, pp. 64–93. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84245-1 3
• Gentry, C., Halevi, S., Lyubashevsky, V.: Practical noninteractive publicly verifiable secret sharing with thousands of parties. In: Dunkelman, O., Dziembowski, S. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2022. LNCS, vol. 13275, pp. 458–487. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06944-4 16
• Gentry, C., Lewko, A., Waters, B.: Witness encryption from instance independent assumptions. In: Garay, J.A., Gennaro, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2014, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8616, pp. 426–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44371-2 24
• Goldwasser, S., Kalai, Y.T., Popa, R.A., Vaikuntanathan, V., Zeldovich, N.: How to run Turing machines on encrypted data. In: Canetti, R., Garay, J.A. (eds.) CRYPTO 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8043, pp. 536–553. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40084-1 30
• Goldwasser, S., Park, S.: Public accountability vs. secret laws: can they coexist?: A cryptographic proposal. In: Thuraisingham, B.M., Lee, A.J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 on Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, Dallas, TX, USA, 30 October–3 November 2017, pp. 99–110. ACM (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3139550.3139565
• Goyal, V., Kothapalli, A., Masserova, E., Parno, B., Song, Y.: Storing and retrieving secrets on a blockchain. In: Hanaoka, G., Shikata, J., Watanabe, Y. (eds.) PKC 2022. LNCS, vol. 13177, pp. 252–282. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-030-97121-2 10
• Green, M., Kaptchuk, G., Van Laer, G.: Abuse resistant law enforcement access systems. In: Canteaut, A., Standaert, F.-X. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2021, Part III. LNCS, vol. 12698, pp. 553–583. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77883-5 19
• Encryption Working Group: Moving the Encryption Policy Conversation Forward. Technical report, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (2019)
• Jarecki, S., Shmatikov, V.: Handcuffing big brother: an abuse-resilient transaction escrow scheme. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 590–608. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3 35
• Jost, D., Maurer, U.: Overcoming impossibility results in composable security using interval-wise guarantees. In: Micciancio, D., Ristenpart, T. (eds.) CRYPTO 2020. LNCS, vol. 12170, pp. 33–62. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56784-2 2
• Kilian, J., Leighton, T.: Fair cryptosystems, revisited. In: Coppersmith, D. (ed.) CRYPTO 1995. LNCS, vol. 963, pp. 208–221. Springer, Heidelberg (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44750-4 17
• Kroll, J.A., Felten, E.W., Boneh, D.: Secure protocols for accountable warrant execution (2014). https://www.jkroll.com/papers/warrant paper.pdf
• Kroll, J.A., Zimmerman, J., Wu, D.J., et al.: Accountable Cryptographic Access Control (2018). https://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/jf/kroll-paper.pdf
• Kügler, D., Vogt, H.: Offline payments with auditable tracing. In: Blaze, M. (ed.) FC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2357, pp. 269–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi. org/10.1007/3-540-36504-4 19
• Kurosawa, K., Furukawa, J.: Universally composable undeniable signature. In: Aceto, L., Damgård, I., Goldberg, L.A., Halldórsson, M.M., Ingólfsdóttir, A., Walukiewicz, I. (eds.) ICALP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5126, pp. 524–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70583-3 43
• Liang, X., Pandey, O.: Towards a unified approach to black-box constructions of zero-knowledge proofs. In: Malkin, T., Peikert, C. (eds.) CRYPTO 2021, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 12828, pp. 34–64. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84259-8 2
• Liu, J., Ryan, M.D., Chen, L.: Balancing societal security and individual privacy: accountable escrow system. In: Datta, A., Fournet, C. (eds.) CSF 2014 Computer Security Foundations Symposium, pp. 427–440. IEEE Computer Society Press (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSF.2014.37
• Nielsen, J.B.: Separating random oracle proofs from complexity theoretic proofs: the non-committing encryption case. In: Yung, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2002. LNCS, vol. 2442, pp. 111–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45708-9 8
• Official Journal of the European Communities. Council Resolution on on the lawful interception of telecommunications (1995). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31996G1104&from=EN
• Official Journal of the European Communities. Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist & financing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU (2018). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31996G1104&from=EN
• Paillier, P., Yung, M.: Self-escrowed public-key infrastructures. In: Song, J.S. (ed.) ICISC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1787, pp. 257–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/10719994 20
• Panwar, G., Vishwanathan, R., Misra, S., Bos, A.: SAMPL: scalable auditability of monitoring processes using public ledgers. In: Cavallaro, L., Kinder, J., Wang, X.F., Katz, J. (eds.) ACM CCS 2019, pp. 2249–2266. ACM Press, November 2019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319535.3354219
• Persiano, G., Phan, D.H., Yung, M.: Anamorphic encryption: private communication against a dictator. In: Dunkelman, O., Dziembowski, S. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2022, Part II. LNCS, vol. 13276, pp. 34–63. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-031-07085-3 2
• Rosulek, M.: Must you know the code of f to securely compute f ? In: Safavi-Naini, R., Canetti, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2012. LNCS, vol. 7417, pp. 87–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32009-5 7
• Savage, S.: Lawful device access without mass surveillance risk: a technical design discussion. In: Lie, D., Mannan, M., Backes, M., Wang, X.F. (eds.) ACM CCS 2018, pp. 1761–1774. ACM Press, October 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3243734. 3243758
• Scafuro, A.: Break-glass encryption. In: Lin, D., Sako, K. (eds.) PKC 2019. LNCS, vol. 11443, pp. 34–62. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17259-6 2
• Servan-Schreiber, S., Wheeler, A.: Judge, jury & encryptioner: exceptional access with a fixed social cost. CoRR abs/1912.05620 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1912. 05620
• Wright, C.V., Varia, M.: Crypto crumple zones: enabling limited access without mass surveillance. In: 2018 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, EuroS&P 2018, London, United Kingdom, 24–26 April 2018, pp. 288–306. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP.2018.00028
• Young, A., Yung, M.: Auto-recoverable auto-certifiable cryptosystems. In: Nyberg, K. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1403, pp. 17–31. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0054114