Rapport d’expertise (Rapports)
Report on Transparency of Company Data by the Informal Expert Group on Company Law and Corporate Governance (ICLEG)
CONAC, Pierre-Henri
2023
 

Documents


Texte intégral
2023-03 icleg report on transparency of company data_for publication.pdf
Postprint Auteur (684.06 kB)
Télécharger

Tous les documents dans ORBilu sont protégés par une licence d'utilisation.

Envoyer vers



Détails



Mots-clés :
European Company Law
Résumé :
[en] Executive Summary (1) It is important for any company’s stakeholder to have access to information on the group’s existence and structure, i.e., to know (i) whether a company belongs to a group and, if that is the case, (ii) which one is the parent company and (iii) which is the whole group’s structure. Accounting Directive 2013/34/EU and Anti-Money Laundering Directive (EU) 2015/849 provide some useful information on groups, but do not tackle directly the issues explained above. (2) There are three main legal policy approaches to the information duties on groups: (1) registral publicity; (2) accounting publicity and (3) commercial publicity. Registral publicity is the first (and preferred) Proposal. It implies to extend the current business register disclosure regime in Art 14 and 19 (2) of Directive 2017/1132. For this approach the Company Law Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (CLD) would have to offer a definition of what “parent” and “subsidiary” means. This could be just a reference to the Accounting Directive, or, in a more ambitious way, it could be tried to harmonize this concept from a minimum harmonization towards a maximum harmonization. A second (complementary) Proposal would be to impose a duty on every group member company to identify in its commercial correspondence, who its parent is (or to identify itself as parent company) and/or in the company website (when adopted) the group information. (3) It should be considered to make information about shareholders of private limited companies available via BRIS, if and to the extent this information is disclosed in the national register of the relevant Member State. (4) Information in the national registers of the Member States about unlimited and limited partnerships and at least their partners with unlimited liability could easily be made available via BRIS. Since the referral to Art 14 in Art 18 (1) CLD only partially fits for partnerships, such a provision could for instance be implemented as a new independent Article of the CLD. (5) All Member States covered by ICLEG have the essential data on cooperatives in a register. But not all Member States have them in their national companies register, some partially use special registers not connected with BRIS. For these Member States BRIS can only show, what they have in connected registers, which will not be all existing national cooperatives.
Disciplines :
Droit européen & international
Auteur, co-auteur :
CONAC, Pierre-Henri  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL) ; Max Planck Institute Luxembourg
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Report on Transparency of Company Data by the Informal Expert Group on Company Law and Corporate Governance (ICLEG)
Date de publication/diffusion :
mars 2023
Nombre de pages :
25
Réalisé à la demande de :
European Commission
Focus Area :
Law / European Law
Disponible sur ORBilu :
depuis le 14 janvier 2024

Statistiques


Nombre de vues
101 (dont 0 Unilu)
Nombre de téléchargements
61 (dont 0 Unilu)

Bibliographie


Publications similaires



Contacter ORBilu