Doctoral thesis (Dissertations and theses)
New technologies and human trafficking. An analysis based on the theory of sovereignty
LANNIER, Salomé
2023
 

Files


Full Text
Lannier Salomé Thesis V8.pdf
Author preprint (6.61 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
human trafficking; new technologies; sovereignty; digital actors; duty to protect; legitimate coercion; partnerships; jurisdiction; digital investigative techniques; right to privacy; due process; electronic evidence; data retention; encryption; corporate criminal liability; online intermediaries’ liability; criminal policy; sex work; content moderation; personal data protection; artificial intelligence; corporate social liability; digital social liability; victims’ protection; trafficking prevention; interdependence
Abstract :
[en] Human trafficking, a criminal offense resulting in the exploitation of people, is increasingly facilitated by new technologies. Similarly, the anti-trafficking framework and its actors are evolving to modernize their strategies and policies. In particular, states and digital actors appear at the crossroads of the repression of trafficking and the regulation of cyberspace. As both seek to participate in this fight, the theory of sovereignty is challenged. Indeed, the repression of cyber human trafficking requires research into who exercises coercion, particularly to establish the obligations of states as sovereigns, and the existence of new sovereigns, specifically to question the role of digital actors. Consequently, when various sovereigns emerge, this study focuses on the order of coercion between them, particularly the strategies they develop and their impact on the repression of cyber human trafficking. Instead of a demonstration in favor of its demise, this study aims to rethink the basis of the theory of sovereignty to offer a new perspective on its application, using the repression of cyber human trafficking as a case study. This study reveals that sovereignty can be applied outside the framework of the state and that relationships of coercion and collaboration are being developed between sovereign entities, challenging the notion of independence as the basis for sovereignty. If sovereignty is linked to the exercise of coercion, it can then be disconnected from the state. This disconnection clearly appears as a result of the limitations of the state in implementing it when digital actors exercise coercion over data. Indeed, various sources of coercion appear in the repression of cyber trafficking and are needed to protect the victims and convict the perpetrators. Consequently, various types of relationships can be drawn between sovereigns. First, imposing coercion between sovereigns hinders the independent exercise of coercion and the effective repression of trafficking. Second, collaboration between sovereigns arises as a strategy to protect each other’s sovereignty and to head toward a comprehensive repression of cyber trafficking. This mindset is particularly developed outside of criminal law. As a result, digital actors are intermediaries in the implementation of human rights, and states are intermediaries for digital actors by lending them guidance and tools to legitimize their actions. However, partly due to a traditional understanding of sovereignty and a mainly neoliberal approach to the business sector, this interconnectedness is negated under the current theory of sovereignty. Its traditional basis, independence, challenges the implementation and legitimization of norms, particularly human rights and antitrafficking frameworks. Accordingly, a complementary criterion could legitimize sovereignty: interdependence. Thus, this study offers a new perspective on sovereignty and adapts it to the current societal environment. The role of the law is also questioned. This study on the legal tools to repress cyber trafficking highlights a downgrade in the quality of the law, specifically criminal law, which is seen as a tool to solve social problems. The law is magnified as a solution, in particular, to challenges derived from technologies, leading to legal solutionism.
Disciplines :
Criminal law & procedure
Author, co-author :
LANNIER, Salomé ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL)
Language :
English
Title :
New technologies and human trafficking. An analysis based on the theory of sovereignty
Defense date :
18 December 2023
Number of pages :
639
Institution :
Université de Bordeaux and Universitat de València
Degree :
Doctorat en droit privé et sciences criminelles
Cotutelle degree :
Doctorado en derechos humanos, democracia y justicia internacional
Promotor :
Bénédicte LAVAUD-LEGENDRE;  Université de Bordeaux [FR] > COMPTRASEC
María Teresa ALEMANY JORDÁN;  Universitat de València > Departamento de Derecho Internacional “Miaja de la Muela”
Jury member :
Carmen AZCÁRRAGA MONZONÍS;  Universitat de Valéncia
Olivier DECIMA;  Université de Bordeaux [FR]
Víctor Luis GUTIÉRREZ CASTILLO;  Universidad de Jaén
Joanne VAN DER LEUN;  Leiden University [NL]
Valère NDIOR;  Université de Bretagne occidentale
Anne WEYEMBERGH;  ULB - Université Libre de Bruxelles [BE]
Focus Area :
Law / European Law
Available on ORBilu :
since 12 January 2024

Statistics


Number of views
255 (24 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
161 (5 by Unilu)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu