Conjoint experiment; Political leaders; Public opinion; Technocratic government; Sociology and Political Science
Abstract :
[en] The aim of this research is to gauge public support for ministers who did not follow a typical “career politician” pathway prior to their nomination (i.e., those who never held an elected office and are not affiliated to a political party) and to understand what drives this support. We use a web-based conjoint experiment fielded in six European countries, in which respondents are presented with pairs of vignettes describing the profile of hypothetical ministers and must state which of the two candidates they would personally prefer. The task is repeated five times, once for the Prime Minister office and once for four specialized minister positions. We find that attributes associated with technocratic government almost always increase popular support for ministers. These preferences are stable across policy domains and are as prevalent in the case of the PM as in the case of specialized ministries. However, we identify substantial cross-country variations: pro-technocratic attitudes are more prevalent in Italy, Poland and Spain than in the UK and Germany.
Disciplines :
Sociology & social sciences
Author, co-author :
Panel, S. ; Sciences Po Grenoble, Université Grenoble Alpes, Cesice, France
PAULIS, Emilien ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Humanities (DHUM) > Philosophy ; Université Libre de Bruxelles, Cevipol, Belgium
Pilet, J.-B.; Université Libre de Bruxelles, Cevipol, Belgium
Rojon, S.; Université Libre de Bruxelles, Cevipol, Belgium
Vittori, D.; Université Libre de Bruxelles, Cevipol, Belgium
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
The Lure of Technocrats: A Conjoint Experiment on Preferences for Technocratic Ministers in Six European Countries
This research has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 772695) for the project CURE OR CURSE.
Ackermann, M., Ackermann, K., & Freitag, M. (2019). The personality of stealth democrats: How traits shape attitudes towards expert-based governments. West European Politics, 42(3), 573–592. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2018.1530494
Alexiadou, D., & Gunaydin, H. (2019). Commitment or expertise? Technocratic appointments as political responses to economic crises. European Journal of Political Research, 58(3), 845–865. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12338
Arnesen, S., Duell, D., & Johannesson, M. P. (2019). Do citizens make inferences from political candidate characteristics when aiming for substantive representation? Electoral Studies, 57, 46–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2018.10.005
Baturo, A. (2016). Cursus honorum: Personal background, careers and experience of political leaders in democracy and dictatorship-new data and analyses. Politics and Governance, 4(2), 138–157. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v4i2.602
Beiser-McGrath, L. F., Huber, R. A., Bernauer, T., & Koubi, V. (2022). Parliament, people or technocrats? Explaining mass public preferences on delegation of policymaking authority. Comparative Political Studies, 55(4), 527–554. DOI: 10.1177/00104140211024284
Bengtsson, Å., & Mattila, M. (2009). Direct democracy and its critics: Support for direct democracy and ‘stealth’ democracy in Finland. West European Politics, 32(5), 1031–1048. DOI: 10.1080/01402380903065256
Bertsou, E. (2022). Bring in the experts? Citizen preferences for independent experts in political decision-making processes. European Journal of Political Research, 61(1), 255–267. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12448
Bertsou, E., & Caramani, D. (2022). People haven’t had enough of experts: Technocratic attitudes among citizens in nine European democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 66(1), 5–23. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12554
Bertsou, E., & Pastorella, G. (2017). Technocratic attitudes: A citizens’ perspective of expert decision-making. West European Politics, 40(2), 430–458. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2016.1242046
Camões, P. J., & Mendes, S. M. (2019). Do citizens trust the civil service differently? Comparing the determinants of confidence in political-administrative institutions. International Journal of Public Administration. 10.1080/01900692.2019.1592187 DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1592187
Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055416000538
Carnes, N., & Lupu, N. (2016). Do voters dislike working-class candidates? Voter biases and the descriptive underrepresentation of the working class. American Political Science Review, 110(4), 832–844. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055416000551
Centeno, M. A. (1993). The new Leviathan: The dynamics and limits of technocracy. Theory and Society, 22(3), 307–335. DOI: 10.1007/BF00993531
Coffé, H., & Michels, A. (2014). Education and support for representative, direct and stealth democracy. Electoral Studies, 35, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.03.006
Cooper, C. A. (2021). Politicization of the bureaucracy across and within administrative traditions. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(7), 564–577. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2020.1739074
Costa Pinto, A., Cotta, M., & Tavares de Almeida, P. (2018). Technocratic ministers and political leadership in European democracies. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62313-9
Dafoe, A., Zhang, B., & Caughey, D. (2018). Information equivalence in survey experiments. Political Analysis, 26(4), 399–416. DOI: 10.1017/pan.2018.9
Dalton, R. J., & Weldon, S. A. (2005). Public images of political parties: A necessary evil? West European Politics, 28(5), 931–951. DOI: 10.1080/01402380500310527
Dorussen, H., & Nanou, K. (2006). European integration, intergovernmental bargaining, and convergence of party programmes. European Union Politics, 7(2), 235–256. DOI: 10.1177/1465116506063709
Esaiasson, P., Persson, M., Gilljam, M., & Lindholm, T. (2019). Reconsidering the role of procedures for decision acceptance. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 291–314. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123416000508
Font, J., Wojcieszak, M., & Navarro, C. J. (2015). Participation, representation and expertise: Citizen preferences for political decision-making processes. Political Studies, 63, 153–172. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12191
Franchino, F., & Zucchini, F. (2015). Voting in a multi-dimensional space: A conjoint analysis employing valence and ideology attributes of candidates. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 221. DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2014.24
Ganuza, E., & Font, J. (2020). Experts in government: What for? Ambiguities in public opinion towards technocracy. Politics and Governance, 8(4), 520–532. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v8i4.3206
Gerring, J., Oncel, E., Morrison, K., & Pemstein, D. (2019). Who rules the world? A portrait of the global leadership class. Perspectives on Politics, 17(4), 1079–1097. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592719000744
Green, J. (2007). When voters and parties agree: Valence issues and party competition. Political Studies, 55(3), 629–655. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
Green, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2008). Owning the issue agenda: Party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 460–476. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003
Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpt024
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511613722
Ignazi, P. (2014). Power and the (il) legitimacy of political parties: An unavoidable paradox of contemporary democracy? Party Politics, 20(2), 160–169. DOI: 10.1177/1354068813519970
Kirkland, P. A., & Coppock, A. (2018). Candidate choice without party labels. Political Behavior, 40(3), 571–591. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-017-9414-8
Landwehr, C., & Harms, P. (2020). Preferences for referenda: Intrinsic or instrumental? Evidence from a survey experiment. Political Studies, 68(4), 875–894. DOI: 10.1177/0032321719879619
Lavezzolo, S., & Ramiro, L. (2018). Stealth democracy and the support for new and challenger parties. European Political Science Review, 10(2), 267–289. DOI: 10.1017/S1755773917000108
Lavezzolo, S., Ramiro, L., & Fernández-Vazquez, P. (2020). The will for reason: Voter demand for experts in office. West European Politics. 10.1080/01402382.2020.1778917 DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2020.1778917
Le Gall, C. (2017). How (European) economic integration affects domestic electoral politics? A review of the literature. French Politics, 15(3), 371–387. DOI: 10.1057/s41253-017-0035-8
Magni-Berton, R., & Panel, S. (2018). Manifestos and public opinion: Testing the relevance of spatial models to explain salience choices. Comparative European Politics, 16(5), 783–804. DOI: 10.1057/s41295-017-0101-2
Magni-Berton, R., & Panel, S. (2021). Gerontocracy in a comparative perspective: Explaining why political leaders are (almost always) older than their constituents. Sociology Compass, 15(1), 12841. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12841
Mair, P. (2008). The challenge to party government. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 211–234. DOI: 10.1080/01402380701835033
McDonnell, D., & Valbruzzi, M. (2014). Defining and classifying technocrat-led and technocratic governments. European Journal of Political Research, 53(4), 654–671. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12054
Pastorella, G. (2016). Technocratic governments in Europe: Getting the critique right. Political Studies, 64(4), 948–965. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12217
Pinto, A. C., Cotta, M., de Almeida, P. T., et al. (2018). Technocratic ministers and political leadership in European democracies. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62313-9
Sanabria-Pulido, P., & Bello-Gómez, R. A. (2020). Public sector reform and perceptions of public servants: An international longitudinal review. The Palgrave handbook of the public servant (pp. 1–19). Springer.
Schwarz, S., & Coppock, A. (2022). What have we learned about gender from candidate choice experiments? A meta-analysis of sixty-seven factorial survey experiments. The Journal of Politics, 84(2), 655–668. DOI: 10.1086/716290
Steiner, N. D., & Martin, C. W. (2012). Economic integration, party polarisation and electoral turnout. West European Politics, 35(2), 238–265. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.648005
Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368–377. DOI: 10.2307/1952828
Strebel, M. A., Kübler, D., & Marcinkowski, F. (2019). The importance of input and output legitimacy in democratic governance: Evidence from a population-based survey experiment in four West European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 488–513. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12293
Vittori, D., Pilet, J.-B., Rojon, S., & Paulis, E. (2023). Technocratic ministers in office in European countries (2000–2020): What’s new? Political Studies Review. 10.1177/14789299221140036 DOI: 10.1177/14789299221140036
Vittori, D., Rojon, S., Pilet, J.-B., & Paulis, E. (2023). Technocracy above partisanship? Comparing the appeal of non-partisan and partisan experts as ministers-a survey in 14 countries. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 10.1177/13691481231178244 DOI: 10.1177/13691481231178244
Vivyan, N., Wagner, M., Glinitzer, K., & Eberl, J.-M. (2020). Do humble beginnings help? How politician class roots shape voter evaluations. Electoral Studies, 63, 102093. DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102093
Webb, P. (2013). Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research, 52(6), 747–772. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12021
Winter, Ld. (1991). Parliamentary and party pathways to the cabinet. The profession of government minister in Western Europe (pp. 44–69). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-11395-8_5
Wojcieszak, M. (2014). Preferences for political decision-making processes and issue publics. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 917–939. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfu039
Wratil, C., & Pastorella, G. (2018). Dodging the bullet: How crises trigger technocrat-led governments. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 450–472. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12234
Wratil, C., & Wäckerle, J. (2022). Majority representation and legitimacy: Survey-experimental evidence from the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 5, 46. 10.1111/1475-6765.12507 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12507
