Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology; General Neuroscience
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
Desmedt, Olivier ; Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, Fund for Scientific Research - Belgium (FRS-FNRS). Electronic address: olivier.desmedt@unil.ch
Corneille, Olivier; Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Luminet, Olivier; Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, Fund for Scientific Research - Belgium (FRS-FNRS
Maurage, Pierre; Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, Fund for Scientific Research - Belgium (FRS-FNRS
VÖGELE, Claus ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Health and Behaviour
SCHULZ, André ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Health and Behaviour
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Do Schulz et al.'s (2021) Findings Support the Validity of the Heartbeat Counting Task? Joint Conclusion to Commentaries.
Biesanz, J.C., West, S.G., Towards understanding assessments of the big five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer. Journal of Personality 72:4 (2004), 845–876, 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00282.x.
Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W., Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56:2 (1959), 81–105.
Carlson, K.D., Herdman, A.O., Understanding the impact of convergent validity on research results. Organizational Research Methods 15:1 (2012), 17–32, 10.1177/1094428110392383.
Chmielewski, M., Sala, M., Tang, R., Baldwin, A., Examining the construct validity of affective judgments of physical activity measures. Psychological Assessment 28:9 (2016), 1128–1141, 10.1037/pas0000322.
Cicchetti, D.V., Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment 6:4 (1994), 284–290, 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1:3 (1992), 98–101, 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783.
Desmedt, O., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., Murphy, J., Bird, G., Maurage, P., Contribution of time estimation and knowledge to heartbeat counting task performance under original and adapted instructions. Biological Psychology, 154, 2020, 107904, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107904.
Desmedt, O., Luminet, O., Maurage, P., Corneille, O., The validity issues of the heartbeat counting task are not ruled out by Schulz et al. (2021): A commentary. Biological Psychology, 2023, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108693.
Desmedt, O., Luminet, O., Maurage, P., Corneille, O., Discrepancies in the Definition and Measurement of Human Interoception: A Comprehensive Discussion and Suggested Ways Forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2023 17456916231191537.
DeVellis, R.F., Scale development: Theory and applications, 2016, SAGE Publications.
Eichler, S., Katkin, E.S., The relationship between cardiovascular reactivity and heartbeat detection. Psychophysiology 31:3 (1994), 229–234, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02211.x.
Gliner, J.A., Morgan, G.A., Harmon, R.J., Measurement validity and reliability. Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis, 3e éd.., 2017, Routledge, 105–146.
Herbert, B.M., Muth, E.R., Pollatos, O., Herbert, C., Interoception across modalities: On the relationship between cardiac awareness and the sensitivity for gastric functions. PloS One, 7(5), 2012, e36646, 10.1371/journal.pone.0036646.
Hickman, L., Seyedsalehi, A., Cook, J.L., Bird, G., Murphy, J., The relationship between heartbeat counting and heartbeat discrimination: A meta-analysis. Biological Psychology, 156, 2020, 107949, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107949.
Knoll, J.F., Hodapp, V., A comparison between two methods for assessing heartbeat perception. Psychophysiology 29:2 (1992), 218–222.
Murphy, J., Brewer, R., Hobson, H., Catmur, C., Bird, G., Is alexithymia characterised by impaired interoception ? Further evidence, the importance of control variables, and the problems with the Heartbeat Counting Task. (Scopus) Biological Psychology 136 (2018), 189–197, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.05.010.
Schandry, R., Bestler, M., Montoya, P., On the relation between cardiodynamics and heartbeat perception. Psychophysiology 30:5 (1993), 467–474, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02070.x.
Schulz, A., Back, S.N., Schaan, V.K., Bertsch, K., Vögele, C., On the construct validity of interoceptive accuracy based on heartbeat counting: Cardiovascular determinants of absolute and tilt-induced change scores. Biological Psychology, 164, 2021, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108168.
Schulz, A., Vögele, C., Why Desmedt et al.’s commentary does not apply to the findings of Schulz et al. (2021) concerning the validity of the heartbeat counting task. Biological Psychology, 2023, 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108689.
van Dyck, Z., Vögele, C., Blechert, J., Lutz, A.P.C., Schulz, A., Herbert, B.M., The water load test as a measure of gastric interoception: Development of a two-stage protocol and application to a healthy female population. PloS One, 11(9), 2016, e0163574, 10.1371/journal.pone.0163574.
Whitehead, W.E., Drescher, V.M., Perception of gastric contractions and self-control of gastric motility. Psychophysiology 17:6 (1980), 552–558, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb02296.x.
