Article (Scientific journals)
Why Desmedt et al.'s commentary does not apply to the findings of Schulz et al. (2021) concerning the validity of the heartbeat counting task.
SCHULZ, André; VÖGELE, Claus
2023In Biological Psychology, 184 (1), p. 108689
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Schulz 2023c.pdf
Publisher postprint (413.37 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Heartbeat counting task; Heartbeat tracking task; Interoception; Validity; Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology; General Neuroscience
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
SCHULZ, André  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Health and Behaviour
VÖGELE, Claus ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Health and Behaviour
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Why Desmedt et al.'s commentary does not apply to the findings of Schulz et al. (2021) concerning the validity of the heartbeat counting task.
Publication date :
26 September 2023
Journal title :
Biological Psychology
ISSN :
0301-0511
eISSN :
1873-6246
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, Netherlands
Volume :
184
Issue :
1
Pages :
108689
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBilu :
since 04 October 2023

Statistics


Number of views
22 (2 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu