| Reference : Assessing Composition in Modeling Approaches |
| Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book | |||
| Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/5680 | |||
| Assessing Composition in Modeling Approaches | |
| English | |
Mussbacher, Gunter  [SCE, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada] | |
| Amalio, Nuno [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >] | |
| Dec-2012 | |
| Proceedings of the CMA 2012 Workshop | |
| ACM | |
| No | |
| CMA 2012 Workshop | |
| October 2012 | |
| [en] Composition ; Modeling | |
| [en] Modeling approaches are based on various paradigms, e.g., aspect-oriented, feature-oriented, object-oriented, and logic-based. Modeling approaches may cover requirements models to low level
design models, are developed for various purposes, use various means of composition, and thus are difficult to compare. However, such comparisons are critical to help practitioners know under which conditions approaches are most applicable, and how they might be successfully generalized and combined to achieve end-to-end methods. This paper reports on work done at the 2nd International Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive modeling methodologies with a particular emphasis on composition: (i) an improved set of comparison criteria; (ii) 19 assessments of modeling approaches based on the comparison criteria and a common, focused case study. | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/5680 | |
| 10.1145/2459031.2459032 |
| File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
|
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.
