The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Social Media Data Research Galaxy - A Primer

ROSSI, Arianna

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31971-6_6

Download

Contribution to collective works (Parts of books)

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Social Media Data Research Galaxy - A Primer

ROSSI, Arianna

2023 • In Bieker, F.; MEYER, J.; Pape, S. et al. (Eds.) Privacy and Identity Management. Privacy and Identity 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10993/55732

DOI
10.1007/978-3-031-31971-6_6

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

published.pdf

Publisher postprint (676.06 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Abstract :

[en] This short paper is a primer for early career researchers that collect and analyze social media data. It provides concise, practical instructions on how to address personal data protection concerns and implement research ethics principles.

Disciplines :

Law, criminology & political science: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Computer science

Author, co-author :

ROSSI, Arianna ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > IRiSC

External co-authors :

Language :

English

Title :

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Social Media Data Research Galaxy - A Primer

Publication date :

2023

Main work title :

Privacy and Identity Management. Privacy and Identity 2022. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology

Editor :

Bieker, F.

MEYER, J.

Pape, S.

Schiering, I.

Weich, A.

Publisher :

Springer, Cham, Unknown/unspecified

ISBN/EAN :

978-3-031-31970-9

Collection name :

671

Pages :

52-65

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

FnR Project :

FNR14717072 - Deceptive Patterns Online, 2020 (01/06/2021-31/05/2024) - Gabriele Lenzini

Funders :

FNR - Fonds National de la Recherche

Available on ORBilu :

since 04 August 2023

Statistics

Number of views

143 (0 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

44 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Article 29 Data Protection Working Party: Guidelines on data protection impact assessment (DPIA) and determining whether processing is ”likely to result in a high risk” for the purposes of regulation 2016/679 (2017). https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/document.cfm?doc id=47711
Article 29 Data Protection Working Party: Guidelines on transparency under regulation 2016/679, 17/EN WP260 rev.01 (2018–04). https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/article29/redirection/document/51025
Article 29 Working Party: Opinion 05/2014 on anonymisation techniques (2014). https://ec.europa.eu/justice/article-29/documentation/opinion-recommendation/files/2014/wp216 en.pdf
Benčin, R., Strle, G.: Social responsibility in science and engineering (2015–06). https://satoriproject.eu/media/1.c-Social-responsibility.pdf
Beninger, K., Fry, A., Jago, N., Lepps, H., Nass, L., Silvester, H.: Research using social media; users’ views (2014). https://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/282288/p0639-research-using-social-media-report-final-190214.pdf
Commission, E.: Horizon 2020 guidance-how to complete your ethics self-assessment (2018). https://eneri.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/H2020-Guidance-How-to-complete-your-ethics-self-assessment.pdf
Ducato, R.: Data protection, scientific research, and the role of information. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 37, 105412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020. 105412, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364920300170
Ducato, R., Strowel, A.M.: Ensuring text and data mining: remaining issues with the EU copyright exceptions and possible ways out. Eur. Intell. Prop. Rev. 43(5), 322–337 (2021). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3829858
European Data Protection Supervisor: Accountability on the ground part II: Data protection impact assessments & prior consultation (2018). https://edps.europa. eu/sites/edp/files/publication/18-02-06 accountability on the ground part 2 en. pdf
European Network and Information Security Agency: Pseudonymisation techniques and best practices: recommendations on shaping technology according to data protection and privacy provisions. Publications Office (2019). https://data. europa.eu/doi/10.2824/247711
Fiesler, C., Beard, N., Keegan, B.C.: No robots, spiders, or scrapers: Legal and ethical regulation of data collection methods in social media terms of service. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 14, pp. 187–196 (2020). https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/7290
Fiesler, C., Proferes, N.: “participant” perceptions of twitter research ethics. Soc. Media + Soc. 4(1), 2056305118763366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366
Franzke, A.S., Bechmann, Anja, Zimmer, M., Ess, Charles M.: Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0: Association of internet researchers (2019). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf
Future TDM: D3.3+ baseline report of policies and barriers of TDM in europe (2016). https://project.futuretdm.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/FutureTDM D3.3-Baseline-Report-of-Policies-and-Barriers-of-TDM-in-Europe.pdf
Hoorn, E., Montagner, C.: Starting with a DPIA methodology for human subject research (2018). https://www.rug.nl/research/research-data-management/downloads/c2-dataprotection-dl/dpia guidance doc v1 pub.pdf
Kaye, L.K., et al.: Ethics guidelines for internet-mediated research (2021). https://www.bps.org.uk/sites/www.bps.org.uk/files/Policy/Policy%20-%20Files/Ethics %20Guidelines%20for%20Internet-mediated%20Research.pdf. ISBN: 978-1-85433-796-2
Kuyumdzhieva, A.: General data protection regulation and horizon 2020 ethics review process: ethics compliance under GDPR. Bioethica. 5(1), 6–12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.12681/bioeth.20832, https://ejournals.epublishing.ekt. gr/index.php/bioethica/article/view/20832
Marwick, A.E., Blackwell, L., Lo, K.: Best practices for conducting risky research and protecting yourself from online harassment. In: Data & Society Guide, p. 10. Data & Society Research Institute (2016). https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Best Practices for Conducting Risky Research-Oct-2016.pdf
Mészáros, J., Ho, C.h.: Big data and scientific research: the secondary use of personal data under the research exemption in the GDPR. Hungarian J. Legal Stud. 59(4), 403–419 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2018.59.4.5, https://akjournals.com/doi/10.1556/2052.2018.59.4.5
Narayanan, A., Shmatikov, V.: De-anonymizing social networks. In: 2009 30th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 173–187 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2009.22, ISSN: 2375-1207
Officer, I.C.: Guide to the UK general data protection regulation (UK GDPR). https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/
Proferes, N.: Information flow solipsism in an exploratory study of beliefs about twitter. Soc. Media + Soc. 3(1), 2056305117698493 (2017). https://doi.org/10. 1177/2056305117698493
Rossi, A., Ducato, R., Haapio, H., Passera, S.: When design met law: design patterns for information transparency. Droit de la Consommation = Consumenterecht: DCCR. 122, 79–121 (2019). https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/40116/1/A. %20Rossi,%20R.%20Ducato,%20H.%20Haapio%20et%20S.%20Passera.pdf
Rossi, A., Kumari, A., Lenzini, G.: Unwinding a legal and ethical ariadne’s thread out of the twitter’s scraping maze. In: Privacy Symposium 2022-Data Protection Law International Convergence and Compliance with Innovative Technologies (DPLICIT). Springer Nature (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09901-4 10
Rossi, A., Arena, M.P., Kocyijit, E., Hani, M.: Challenges of protecting confidentiality in social media data and their ethical import. In: 1st International Workshop on Ethics in Computer Security (EthiCS 2022) Co-located with the 7th IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 554–561. IEEE (2022). https://doi. org/10.1109/EuroSPW55150.2022.00066
Schaub, F., Balebako, R., Durity, A.L., Cranor, L.F.: A design space for effective privacy notices. In: Proceedings of Eleventh Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS 2015), pp. 1–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5555/3235866. 3235868
Stallings, W.: Operating system security (chapter 24). In: Computer Security Handbook, pp. 24.1–24.21. Wiley, 6 edn. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118851678.ch24
Townsend, L., Wallace, C.: The ethics of using social media data in research: a new framework. In: Woodfield, K. (ed.) The Ethics of Online Research, Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, vol. 2, pp. 189–207. Emerald Publishing Limited (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000002008
Tripathy, B.K.: De-anonymization techniques for social networks. In: Dey, N., Borah, S., Babo, R., Ashour, A.S. (eds.) Social Network Analytics, pp. 71– 85. Academic Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815458-8.00004-9, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128154588000049
Vitak, J., Shilton, K., Ashktorab, Z.: Beyond the Belmont principles: Ethical challenges, practices, and beliefs in the online data research community. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 941–953. ACM (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2820078
Williams, M.L., Burnap, P., Sloan, L.: Towards an ethical framework for publishing twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views, online context and algorithmic estimation. Sociology 51(6), 1149–1168 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140