Campbell, A.L., Self-interest, social security, and the distinctive participation patterns of senior citizens. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 96:3 (2002), 565–574.
Campbell, A.L., Policy makes mass politics. Ann. Rev. Pol. Sci. 15 (2012), 333–351.
Capano, G., Howlett, M., The knows and unknows of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open 10:1 (2020), 1–13.
Capano, G., Howlett, M, A modern guide to public policy. 2020, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Daugbjerg, C., Kay, A., Policy feedback and pathways: When change leads to endurance and continuity to change. Policy Sciences 53 (2020), 253–268.
Davies, H.T.O, Nutley, S.M., Smith, P.C., What works? Evidence-Based Policy And Practice In Public Services. 2000, The Policy Press, Bristol.
Demeritt, D., The new social for science: accountability, relevance, and value in US and UK science and research policy. Antipode 32:3 (2000), 308–329.
Edmondson, D.L., Kern, F., Rogge, K.S., The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Res. Policy 48:10 (2019), 1–14.
Elzinga, A., The Science-society contract in historical transformation: with special reference to “epistemic drift”. Social Science Information 36:3 (1997), 411–445.
Gläser, J., Laudel, G., Governing science: how science policy shapes research content. Eur. J. of Soc. 57:1 (2016), 117–168.
Gläser, J., Serrano-Velarde, K.S., Changing funding arrangements and the production of scientific knowledge: Introduction to the special issue. Minerva 56:1 (2018), 1–10.
Geuna, A., The changing rationale for European university research funding: Are there negative unintended consequences?. J. Econ. Issues 35:3 (2001), 607–632.
Geuna, A., Martin, B.R., University Res. Eval. and funding: An international comparison. Minerva 41 (2003), 277–304.
Gorard, S., Rushforth, K., Taylor, C., Is there a shortage of quantitative work in education research?. Oxford Rev. Educ. 30:3 (2007), 371–395.
Hargreaves, D.H., Teaching as a Research-Based Profession: Possibilities And Prospects. 1996, Teacher Training Agency, London.
HEFCE/ESRC, not dated. Social Science by Numbers: Careers With Quantitative Methods. HEFCE/ESRC, London.
Hessels, L.K., van Lente, H., Smits, R., In search of relevance: the changing contract between science and society. Sci. Public Policy 36:5 (2009), 387–401.
Hessels, L.K, Grin, J., Smits, E.H.M., The effects of a changing institutional environment on academic research practices: Three cases from agricultural science. Sci. Public Policy 38:7 (2011), 555–568.
Hessels, L.K., van Lente, H., Practical applications as a source of credibility: A comparison of three fields of Dutch academic chemistry. Minerva 49 (2011), 215–240.
Hicks, D., Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy 41:2 (2012), 251–261.
Hillage, J., Pearson, R., Anderson, A., Tamkin, P., Excellence in Research In Schools. 1998, Department for Education and Employment, London.
James, M., Pollard, A, Principles for Effective Pedagogy: International Responses To Evidence from the UK Teaching & Learning Research Programme. Eds, 2011, Routledge, London.
Kaltenbrunner, W., Managing budgetary uncertainty, interpreting policy. How researchers integrate “grand challenges” funding programs into their research agendas. J. Responsible Innovation 7:3 (2020), 320–341.
Kern, F., Rogge, K.S., Howlett, M., Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy 48:10 (2019), 1–15.
Lascoumes, P., Le Galès, P., Gouverner par les instruments. 2004, Press de la Fondation Nationale des Science Politiques, Paris.
Lascoumes, P., Le Galès, P., Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments – From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance 20:1 (2007), 1–21.
Lascoumes, P., Le Galès, P., Sociologie de l'action publique. 2nd ed., 2012, Armand Colin, Paris.
Lascoumes, P., Simard, L., Public policy seen through the prism of its instruments. Introduction. Revue Française de Sci. Politique 61:1 (2011), 1–17.
Lee, F.S., The Research Assessment Exercise, the state and the dominance of the mainstream economics in British universities. Cambridge J. Econ. 31:2 (2007), 309–325.
Lepori, B., Coordination modes in public funding systems. Research Policy 40:3 (2011), 355–367.
Lepori, B., van den Besselaar, P., Dinges, M., Potì, B., Reale, E., Slipersæter, S., Thèves, J., van der Meulen, B., Comparing the evolution of national research policies: what patterns of change?. Sci. Public Policy 34:6 (2007), 372–388.
Lind, J.K., The missing link: How university managers mediate the impact of a performance-based research funding system. Res. Eval. 28:1 (2019), 84–93.
Lucas, L., The Research Game in Academic Life. 2006, Open University Press, Maidenhead.
Martin, B.R., R&D policy instruments – A critical review of what we do and don't know. Industry and Innovation 23:2 (2016), 157–176.
Marques, M., Research Governance Through Public Funding Instruments: Institutional Change in Educational Research in the European Union and England (1984–2014). 2018, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Marques, M., Powell, J.J.W., Zapp, M., Biesta, G., How does Res. Eval. impact educational research? Exploring intended and unintended consequences of research assessment in the United Kingdom, 1986-2014. Eur. Educ. Res. J. 16:6 (2017), 820–842.
Marques, M., Powell, J.J.W., Ratings, rankings and research evaluation: how do Schools of Education behave strategically within stratified UK higher education?. Higher Educ. 79 (2020), 829–846.
McNay, I., Imbalancing the academy: the impact of research quality assessment. Sociol. Italiana – AIS J. Sociol. 8 (2016), 119–150.
Mettler, S., SoRelle, M., Policy feedback theory. Weible, CM, Sabatier, PA, (eds.) Theories of the policy process, Eds., 2018, Routledge, New York, 103–134.
Meuser, M., Nagel, U., The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. A. Bogner, A, Littig, B, Menz, M, (eds.) Interviewing Experts, Eds., 2009, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 17–42.
Oancea, A., Criticisms of educational research: key topics and levels of analysis. British Educ. Res. J. 31:2 (2005), 157–183.
Oppenheim, C., The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology. J. Documentation 53:5 (1997), 477–487.
Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duam, N., Hoagwood, K., Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Admin. Policy Mental Health Mental Health Services 42:5 (2015), 533–544.
Pierson, P., When effect becomes cause: policy feedback and political change. World Politics 45:4 (1993), 595–628.
Peters, B.G., Van Nispen, F.K.M., Public Policy Instruments: Evaluating The Tools Of Public Administration. 1998, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
Pollard, A., The United Kingdom's teaching and learning research programme. (Eds) Burns, T, Schuller, T., (eds.) Evidence in Education: Linking Research And Policy, 2007, OECD/CERI, Paris, 125–141.
RAE (2001). Research Assessment Exercise. Overview reports from the panels. Education. (downloaded on 15 May 2020 from http://www.rae.ac.uk/2001/overview/docs/UoA68.pdf.).
RAE (2009). Research Assessment Exercise. Overview report. Sub-Panel 45 education. (downloaded on 15 May 2020 from http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2009/ov/).
Reale, E., Seeber, M., The transformation of steering and governance in higher education: funding and evaluation as policy instruments. 2011, Working Paper Cnr-Ceris, CERIS, Torino n.02/2011.
REF (2015). Research Excellence Framework 2014: Overview report by Main Panel C and sub-panels 16-26. (downloaded on 15 May 2020 from http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/expanel/member/Main%20Panel%20C%20overview%20report.pdf. ).
Rip, A., van der Meulen, B.J.R., The post-modern research system. Sci. Public Policy 23:6 (1996), 343–352.
Rogge, K.S., Reichardt, K., Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy 45:8 (2016), 1620–1635.
Rogge, K.S., Kern, F., Howlett, M., Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 33 (2017), 1–10.
Sanderson, I., Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration 80:1 (2002), 1–22.
Sharland, E., Where are we now? Strengths and limitation of UK social work and social care research. Soc. Work Soc. Sci. Rev. 16:2 (2013), 7–19.
Schattschneider, E.E., Politics, Pressure, And The Tariff. 1935, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.
Schneider, A., Ingram, H., Behavioral assumptions of policy tools. J. Politics 52:2 (1990), 510–528.
Schneider, A., Ingram, H., Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. Am. Pol. Sci. Rev. 87 (1993), 334–347.
Skocpol, T., Protecting Soldiers And Mothers: The Political Origins Of Social Policy in the United States. 1992, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Sorrell, S., Smith, A., Betz, R., Walz, R., Boemare, C., Quirion, P., Sijm, J., Konidari, D.M.P., Vasson, S., Haralampopoulos, D., Pilinis, C., Interaction in EU Climate Policy. Science Policy Research Unit. 2003, University of Sussex, Sussex.
The British Academy (2012). Society counts: Quantitative skills in the social sciences and humanities. (downloaded on 10 June 2021 from https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publications/quantitative-skills-society-counts-social-sciences-humanities/.).
Thelen, K., Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Ann. Rev. Political Sci. 2 (1999), 369–404.
Trencher, G., van der Heijden, J., Instrument interactions and relationships in policy mixes: achieving complementarity in building energy efficiency policies in New York, Sidney and Tokyo. Energy Research & Social Science 54 (2019), 34–45.
Tooley, J., Darby, D., Educational research: A critique. A Survey Of Published Educational Research. 1998, Office for Standards in Education, London.
Tushman, M.L., Scanlan, T.J., Boundary spanning individual: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Acad. Manag. J. 24:2 (1981), 289–305.
Ulnicane, I., Grand challenges concept: A Return of the “big ideas” in science, technology and innovation policy?. Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy 11:1/2/3 (2016), 5–21.
Whitley, R., Changing governance and authority relations in the public sciences. Minerva 49 (2011), 359–385.
Whitley, R., Gläser, J., The Changing Governance Of The Sciences. The advent of Research Evaluation Systems. 2007, Springer, Dordrecht.
Whitley, R., Gläser, J., Engwall, L, Reconfiguring Knowledge Production: Changing Authority Relationships In The Sciences And Their Consequences For Intellectual Innovation. 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Whitley, R., Gläser, J., Organizational Transformation And Scientific Change: The Impact Of Institutional Restructuring On Universities And Intellectual Innovation. 2014, Emerald Publishing, Bingley.
Whitley, R., Gläser, J., Laudel, G., The impact of changing funding and authority relationships on scientific innovations. Minerva 56:1 (2018), 109–134.
Woelert, P., McKenzie, L., Follow the money? How Australian universities replicate national performance-based funding mechanisms. Res. Eval. 27:3 (2018), 184–195.
Zacharewicz, T., Lepori, B., Reale, E., Jonkers, K., Performance-based research funding in EU Member States – a comparative assessment. Sci. Public Policy 46:1 (2018), 105–115.
Zapp, M., Marques, M., Powell, J.J.W., European Educational Research (Re)Constructed: Institutional change in Germany, the United Kingdom, Norway, and the European Union. 2018, Oxford Symposium Books, Oxford.