Blockchain; Certificate; Decarbonization; Distributed ledger technology; Electric vehicle; Guarantee of origin; Personal carbon trading; Privacy; Non-fungible token; Sustainability; Zero-knowledge proof
Résumé :
[en] In the energy transition, there is an urgent need for decreasing overall carbon emissions. Against this background, the purposeful and verifiable tracing of emissions in the energy system is a crucial key element for promoting the deep decarbonization towards a net zero emission economy with a market-based approach. Such an effective tracing system requires end-to-end information flows that link carbon sources and sinks while keeping end consumers’ and businesses’ sensitive data confidential. In this paper, we illustrate how non-fungible tokens with fractional ownership can help to enable such a system, and how zero-knowledge proofs can address the related privacy issues associated with the fine-granular recording of stakeholders’ emission data. Thus, we contribute to designing a carbon emission tracing system that satisfies verifiability, distinguishability, fractional ownership, and privacy requirements. We implement a proof-of-concept for our approach and discuss its advantages compared to alternative centralized or decentralized architectures that have been proposed in the past. Based on a technical, data privacy, and economic analysis, we conclude that our approach is a more suitable technical backbone for end-to-end digital carbon emission tracing than previously suggested solutions.
Disciplines :
Gestion des systèmes d’information Sciences informatiques
Ahi P, Searcy C (2015) An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. J Clean Prod 86:360–377
Al Sadawi A, Madani B, Saboor S, Ndiaye M, Abu-Lebdeh G (2021) A comprehensive hierarchical blockchain system for carbon emission trading utilizing blockchain of things and smart contract. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 173:121124
Albrecht S, Reichert S, Schmid J, Strüker J, Neumann D, Fridgen G (2018) Dynamics of blockchain implementation—a case study from the energy sector. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3527–3536
Amine O, Baghery K, Pindado Z, Ràfols C (2020) Simulation Extractable Versions of Groth’s zk-SNARK Revisited (2020). https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1306.pdf Accessed 2022-04-22
Appel AW (2015) Verification of a cryptographic primitive: SHA-256. ACM Trans Program Lang Syst 37(2)
Association of Issuing Bodies: EECS Rules Release 7 v15 (2021). https://www.aib-net.org/eecs/eecsr-rules Accessed 2022-04-22
Barbereau TJ, Smethurst R, Sedlmeir J, Fridgen G, Rieger A (2022) Tokenization and regulatory compliance for art and collectible markets: From regulators’ demands for transparency to investors’ demands for privacy. In: Lacity M, Treiblmaier H (ed) Blockchains and the token economy: studies in theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Vienna
Baza M, Sherif A, Mahmoud MM, Bakiras S, Alasmary W, Abdallah M, Lin X (2021) Privacy-preserving blockchain-based energy trading schemes for electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 70(9):9369–9384
Bechtel A, Ferreira A, Gross J, Sandner P (2022) The future of payments in a DLT-based European economy: a roadmap. In: The Future of Financial Systems in the Digital Age, pp. 89–116. Springer, Singapore
Beck R, Müller-Bloch C, King JL (2018) Governance in the blockchain economy: a framework and research agenda. J Assoc Inf Syst 1020–1034
Ben-Sasson E, Chiesa A, Genkin D, Tromer E, Virza M (2013) SNARKs for C: Verifying program executions succinctly and in zero knowledge. In: Annual Cryptology Conference, pp. 90–108. Springer, Santa Barbara, USA
Ben-Sasson E, Bentov I, Horesh Y, Riabzev M (2019) Scalable zero knowledge with no trusted setup. In: Annual International Cryptology Conference, pp. 701–732. Springer, Santa Barbara, USA
Biryukov A, Khovratovich D, Pustogarov I (2014) Deanonymisation of clients in Bitcoin P2P network. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 15–29
Björklund M, Martinsen U, Abrahamsson M (2012) Performance measurements in the greening of supply chains. Supply Chain Manag Int J 17(1):29–39
Butijn B-J, Tamburri DA, Heuvel W-Jvd (2020) Blockchains: a systematic multivocal literature review. ACM Comput Surveys 53(3)
Cachin C, Vukolić M (2022) Blockchain consensus protocols in the wild (2017). arXiv:1707.01873 Accessed 2022-04-22
Castellanos JAF, Coll-Mayor D, Notholt JA (2017) Cryptocurrency as guarantees of origin: Simulating a green certificate market with the Ethereum blockchain. In: International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering, pp. 367–372. IEEE, Oshawa, Canada
de Lima TD, Franco JF, Lezama F, Soares J, Vale Z (2021) Joint optimal allocation of electric vehicle charging stations and renewable energy sources including CO 2 emissions. Energy Inf 4(2)
Djamali A, Dossow P, Hinterstocker M, Schellinger B, Sedlmeir J, Völter F, Willburger L (2021) Asset logging in the energy sector: a scalable blockchain-based data platform. Energy Inf 4(3)
Ethereum Foundation: ERC-721 Non-Fungible Token Standard (2022). https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/standards/tokens/erc-721/ Accessed 2020-04-22
European Commission: Monitoring, reporting and verification of EU ETS emissions (2021). https://ec.europa.eu/clima/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/monitoring-reporting-and-verification-eu-ets-emissions_en Accessed 2022-04-22
Farmer B (2022) Introducing Plonky2. https://blog.polygon.technology/introducing-plonky2/ Accessed 2022-04-22
Financial Times: Heavyweight Investors Demand More Disclosure of Environmental Risks (2021). https://www.ft.com/content/7d23ef7f-33ba-4466-b2f1-2a5dfeba1e33 Accessed 2022-04-22
Fiorini L, Aiello M (2018) Household CO 2 -efficient energy management. Energy Inf 1(1):21–34
Fridgen G, Radszuwill S, Urbach N, Utz L (2018) Cross-organizational workflow management using blockchain technology—towards applicability, auditability and automation. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3507–3517
Fridgen G, Körner M-F, Walters S, Weibelzahl M (2021) Not all doom and gloom: how energy-intensive and temporally flexible data center applications may actually promote renewable energy sources. Bus Inf Syst Eng 63(3):243–256
Fridgen G, Halbrügge S, Körner M-F, Michaelis A, Weibelzahl M (2022) Artificial intelligence in energy demand response: a taxonomy of input data requirements. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022 Proceedings
Fuso Nerini F, Fawcett T, Parag Y, Ekins P (2021) Personal carbon allowances revisited. Nat Sustain 4(12):1025–1031
Gailly N, Maller M, Nitulescu A (2021) SnarkPack: Practical SNARK Aggregation. https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/529 Accessed 2022-04-22
Goebel C, Jacobsen H-A, Del Razo V, Doblander C, Rivera J, Ilg J, Flath C, Schmeck H, Weinhardt C, Pathmaperuma D et al (2014) Energy informatics. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):25–31
Goebel P, Reuter C, Pibernik R, Sichtmann C, Bals L (2018) Purchasing managers’ willingness to pay for attributes that constitute sustainability. J Oper Manag 62:44–58
Gola C, Sedlmeir J (2022) Addressing the sustainability of distributed ledger technology. Bank of Italy Occasional Paper (670)
Goldwasser S, Micali S, Rackoff C (1989) The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems. SIAM J Comput 18(1):186–208
Grassi L, Khovratovich D, Rechberger C, Roy A, Schofnegger M (2021) Poseidon: A new hash function for zero-knowledge proof systems. In: 30th USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 519–535. USENIX Association, virtual event
Groth J (2016) On the size of pairing-based non-interactive arguments. In: Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, pp. 305–326. Springer
Gross J, Sedlmeir J, Babel M, Bechtel A, Schellinger B (2021) Designing a Central Bank Digital Currency with Support for Cash-like Privacy. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3891121 Accessed 2022-04-22
Hanny L, Körner M-F, Leinauer C, Michaelis A, Strüker J, Weibelzahl M, Weissflog J (2022) How to trade electricity flexibility using artificial intelligence: an integrated algorithmic framework. Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3589–3598
Hassini E, Surti C, Searcy C (2012) A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. Int J Prod Econ 140(1):69–82
Heffron RJ (2021) Energy multinationals challenged by the growth of human rights. Nat Energy 6:849–851
Herbes C, Ramme I (2014) Online marketing of green electricity in Germany—a content analysis of providers’ websites. Energy Policy 66:257–266
Hermez Network: Open Sourcing an Ultra-fast zk Prover: Rapidsnark (2021). https://blog.hermez.io/open-sourcing-ultra-fast-zk-prover-rapidsnark/ Accessed 2022-04-22
Hervani AA, Helms MM, Sarkis J (2005) Performance measurement for green supply chain management. An International Journal, Benchmarking
Holly S, Nieße A, Tröschel M, Hammer L, Franzius C, Dmitriyev V, Dorfner J, Veith EM, Harnischmacher C, Greve M, et al (2020) Flexibility management and provision of balancing services with battery-electric automated guided vehicles in the hamburg container terminal altenwerder. Energy Inf 3(1)
IPCC: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press (2021). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Full_Report.pdf Accessed 2022-04-22
Jackson A, Lloyd A, Macinante J, Hüwener M (2018) Networked carbon markets: Permissionless innovation with distributed ledgers? In: Transforming Climate Finance and Green Investment with Blockchains, pp. 255–268. Elsevier, Oxford, UK
Klingert S (2018) Mapping data centre business types with power management strategies to identify demand response candidates, pp. 492–498
Knirsch F, Brunner C, Unterweger A, Engel D (2020) Decentralized and permission-less green energy certificates with GECKO. Energy Inf 3(1):1–17
Körner M-F, Sedlmeir J, Weibelzahl M, Fridgen G, Heine M, Neumann C (2022) Systemic risks in electricity systems: a perspective on the potential of digital technologies. Energy Policy 164:112901
Lehtinen J, Ahola T (2010) Is performance measurement suitable for an extended enterprise? Int J Oper Prod Manag 30(2):181–204
Maestrini V, Luzzini D, Maccarrone P, Caniato F (2017) Supply chain performance measurement systems: a systematic review and research agenda. Int J Prod Econ 183:299–315
Märkle-Huß J, Feuerriegel S, Neumann D (2018) Contract durations in the electricity market: causal impact of 15min trading on the EPEX SPOT market. Energy Economics 69:367–378
Merkle RC (1988) A digital signature based on a conventional encryption function. In: CRYPTO ’87: A Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques on Advances in Cryptology, pp. 369–378. Springer, London
Munilla Garrido G, Sedlmeir J, Uludağ Ö, Alaoui IS, Luckow A, Matthes F (2021) Revealing the landscape of privacy-enhancing technologies in the context of data markets for the IoT: a systematic literature review. J Netw Comput Appl 103465
Pfitzmann A, Hansen M (2010) A terminology for talking about privacy by data minimization: Anonymity, unlinkability, undetectability, unobservability, pseudonymity, and identity management
Pigeolet L, Van Waeyenberge A (2019) Assessment and challenges of carbon markets. Braz J Int Law 16:74
Pina A, Silva C, Ferrão P (2012) The impact of demand side management strategies in the penetration of renewable electricity. Energy 41(1):128–137
Platt M, Bandara RJ, Drăgnoiu A-E, Krishnamoorthy S (2021) Information privacy in decentralized applications. In: Trust Models for Next-Generation Blockchain Ecosystems, pp. 85–104. Springer, Cham
Qorri A, Mujkić Z, Kraslawski A (2018) A conceptual framework for measuring sustainability performance of supply chains. J Clean Prod 189:570–584
Richard P, Mamel S, Vogel L (2019) Blockchain in the Integrated Energy Transition. https://www.dena.de/fileadmin/user_upload/dena-Studie_Blockchain_Integrierte_Energiewende_EN.pdf Accessed 2022-04-22
Rieger A, Roth T, Sedlmeir J, Fridgen G (2022) We need a broader debate on the sustainability of blockchain. Joule
Rouholamini M, Miller CJ, Wang C (2020) Determining consumer’s carbon emission obligation through virtual emission tracing in power systems. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 39(1):13279
Sasson EB, Chiesa A, Garman C, Green M, Miers I, Tromer E, Virza M (2014) Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from Bitcoin. In: IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 459–474
Schellinger B, Völter F, Urbach N, Sedlmeir J (2022) Yes, I do: Marrying blockchain applications with GDPR. In: Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 4631–4640
Schneier B (2017) Applied cryptography: protocols, algorithms and source code in C. Wiley, New York
Sedlmeir J, Buhl HU, Fridgen G, Keller R (2020) The energy consumption of blockchain technology: beyond myth. Bus Inf Syst Eng 62(6):599–608
Sedlmeir J, Völter F, Strüker J (2021) The next stage of green electricity labeling: using zero-knowledge proofs for blockchain-based certificates of origin and use. ACM Sigenergy Energy Inf Rev 1(1):20–31
Sedlmeir J, Lautenschlager J, Fridgen G, Urbach N (2022) The transparency challenge of blockchain in organizations. Electronic Markets
Staudt P, Lehnhoff S, Watson R (2019) Energy informatics—call for papers, issue 3/2021. Bus Inf Syst Eng 61(6):767–769
Strüker J, Weibelzahl M, Körner M-F, Kießling A, Franke-Sluijk A, Hermann M (2021) Decarbonisation through digitalisation: proposals for transforming the energy sector. University of Bayreuth, the Project Group Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT and TenneT TSO GmbH. https://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/5762/ Accessed 2022-04-22
Sullivan R, Gouldson A (2012) Does voluntary carbon reporting meet investors’ needs? J Clean Prod 36:60–67
Sunyaev A, Kannengießer N, Beck R, Treiblmaier H, Lacity M, Kranz J, Fridgen G, Spankowski U, Luckow A (2021) Token economy. Bus Inf Syst Eng 63(4):457–478
United Nations: Paris Agreement (2015). https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015/application/pdf/paris_agreement_english_.pdf Accessed 2022-04-22
United Nations Security Council: Climate Change ‘Biggest Threat Modern Humans Have Ever Faced’, World-Renowned Naturalist Tells Security Council, Calls for Greater Global Cooperation (2021). https://www.un.org/press/en/2021/sc14445.doc.htmf Accessed 2022-04-22
vom Brocke J, Watson RT, Dwyer C, Elliot S, Melville N (2013) Green information systems: directives for the IS discipline. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 33(1):30
Watanabe R, Robinson G (2005) The European Union emissions trading scheme (EU ETS). Climate Policy 5(1):10–14. 10.1080/14693062.2005.9685537
Watson RT, Boudreau M-C, Chen AJ (2010) Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly 34(1):23–38
Whitaker A, Kräussl R (2020) Fractional equity, blockchain, and the future of creative work. Manage Sci 66(10):4594–4611
World Economic Forum: how digital tracing can reduce industrial carbon emissions (2021). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/12/digital-tracing-industrial-carbon-emissions-decarbonization/ Accessed 2022-02-14
Zampou E, Mourtos I, Pramatari K, Seidel S (2022) A design theory for energy and carbon management systems in the supply chain. J Assoc Inf Syst 23(1):329–371
Zhang R, Xue R, Liu L (2019) Security and privacy on blockchain. ACM Comput Surveys 52(3)
Zhou S, Brown MA (2017) Smart meter deployment in Europe: a comparative case study on the impacts of national policy schemes. J Clean Prod 144:22–32
