Alvarez, S., Rubio, A., Carbon footprint in green public procurement: a case study in the services sector. J. Clean. Prod. 93 (2015), 159–166, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.048.
Appolloni, A., Coppola, M.A., Piga, G., Shakya, R.K., Implementation of green considerations in public procurement. Green Public Procurement Strategies for Environmental Sustainability, 2019, IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, 23–44, 10.4018/978-1-5225-7083-7.
Appelt, S., & Galindo-Rueda, F. 2016. Measuring the link between public procurement and innovation OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2016/03. doi:10.1787/5jlvc7sl1w7h-en.
Aschhoff, B., Sofka, W., Innovation on demand – Can public procurement drive market success of innovations?. Res. Policy 38:8 (2009), 1235–1247, 10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.011.
Athey, S., Imbens, G.W, Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica 74:2 (2006), 431–497 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3598807.
Baron, R., The Role of Public Procurement in Low-Carbon Innovation. Background Paper for the 33rd Round Table on Sustainable Development. 2016, OECD.
Baum, C.F., Kordestani, A., Schäfer, D., Stephan, A., Firms in (Green) Public Procurement: Financial Strength Indicators’ Impact on Contract Awards and Its Repercussion on Financial Strength. 2021, DIW Discussion Paper, Berlin 1984.
Becker, J., Niemann, M., Halsbenning, S., Contribution to Growth. European Public Procurement. Delivering Economic Benefits for Citizens and Businesses. 2019, European Union, Brussel.
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., Mullainathan, S., How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. Q. J. Econ. 119:1 (2004), 249–275, 10.1162/003355304772839588.
Bizzaro, S., Ferreiro, M., Sustainable public procurement in Portugal: the case of two public school canteens. Region. Sci. Policy Practic., 2021, 10.1111/rsp3.12508.
Brammer, S., Walker, H., Sustainable procurement in the public sector: an international comparative study. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 31:4 (2011), 452–476, 10.1108/01443571111119551.
Braulio-Gonzalo, M., Bovea, M.D, Criteria analysis of green public procurement in the Spanish furniture sector. J. Clean. Prod., 258, 2020, 120704, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120704.
Braulio-Gonzalo, M., Bovea, M.D., Relationship between green public procurement criteria and sustainability assessment tools applied to office buildings. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 2020, 106310, 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106310 In this issue.
Caravella, S., Crespi, F., The role of public procurement as innovation lever: evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Econ. Innovat. New Technol., 2020, 1–22, 10.1080/10438599.2020.1761591.
Caravella, S., Crespi, F., Unfolding heterogeneity: the different policy drivers of different eco-innovation modes. Environ. Sci. Policy 114 (2020), 182–193, 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.003.
Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., Mancusi, M.L, Financial constraints and public funding of eco-innovation: empirical evidence from European SMEs. Small Bus. Econ. 54:1 (2020), 285–302, 10.1007/s11187-018-0090-9.
Cerutti, A.K., Contu, S., Ardente, F., Donno, D., Beccaro, G.L, Carbon footprint in green public procurement: policy evaluation from a case study in the food sector. Food Policy 58 (2016), 82–93, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.12.001.
Cheng, W., Appolloni, A., D'Amato, A., Zhu, Q, Green public procurement, missing concepts and future trends – aa critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 176 (2018), 770–784, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.027.
Commission of the European Parliament. Public Procurement for a Better Environment. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. 2008 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0400&from=EN.
Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Martini, C., Pennacchio, L., Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: the case of the biofuels sector. Res. Policy 44:3 (2015), 577–595, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.011.
Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Palma, A., Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: a patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies. Res. Policy 46:4 (2017), 799–819, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.004.
Crespi, F., Guarascio, D., The demand-pull effect of public procurement on innovation and industrial renewal. Ind. Corp. Change 28:4 (2019), 793–815, 10.1093/icc/dty055.
Czarnitzki, D., Hünermund, P., Moshgbar, N., Public procurement of innovation: evidence from a German legislative reform. Int. J. Ind. Org., 71, 2020, 102620, 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2020.102620.
Da Costa, B., Da Motta, A.L.T.S, Key factors hindering sustainable procurement in the Brazilian public sector: a Delphi study. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plann. 14:2 (2019), 152–171, 10.2495/SDP-V14-N2-152-171.
Dai, X., Li, Y., Chen, K., Direct demand-pull and indirect certification effects of public procurement for innovation. Technovation, 2020, 102198, 10.1016/j.technovation. 2020.102198.
Dalpé, R., DeBresson, C., Xiaoping, H., The public sector as first user of innovations. Res. Policy 21:3 (1992), 251–263, 10.1016/0048-7333(92)90019-Z.
Demircioglu, M.A., Vivona, R., Positioning public procurement as a procedural tool for innovation: an empirical study. Policy Soc. 40:3 (2021), 379–396, 10.1080/14494035.2021.1955465.
Draca, M., Reagan's innovation dividend?. Technological Impacts of the 1980s US defense Build-up. CAGE Online Working Paper, 2013, 168.
Edler, J., Georghiou, L., Public procurement and innovation – resurrecting the demand side. Res. Policy 36:7 (2007), 949–963, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003.
Edquist, C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M., Pre-commercial procurement: a demand or supply policy instrument in relation to innovation?. R&D Manag. 45:2 (2015), 147–160, 10.1111/radm.12057.
Edquist, C., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M., Functional procurement for innovation, welfare, and the environment. Sci. Publ. Policy 47:5 (2020), 595–603, 10.1093/scipol/scaa046.
energiezukunft. Norwegische Elektrofähre wird Zur Erfolgsgeschichte. 2018 (Accessed 15 February 2021 at https://www.energiezukunft.eu/wirtschaft/norwegische-elektrofaehre-wird-zur-erfolgsgeschichte/).
European Commission. Commission decision of 9 December 2008 notified under document number C(2008) 7871. Off. J. Eur. Union, 2008 L(349/1).
European Commission. SMES, Resource Efficiency and Green Markets. Flash Eurobarometer 381. 2013, European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission. Buying Green! A Handbook on Green Public Procurement. 3rd Ed., 2016, Publications Office of the European Union. (downloaded on 21 April 2021 from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2779/246106).
European Commission. Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2017/2365. Off. J. Eur. Union, 2017 L(337/19).
European Commission. 2021. Case law. (Accessed 15. February 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/case_law_en.htm).
European Commission. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. 2020, Communication from the Commission.
Eurostat. High-Tech Industry and Knowledge-Intensive Services (htec). 2020, Eurostat metadata (downloaded on 26 August 2021 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/htec_esms.htm#contact1580829488131).
Fabrizi, A., Guarini, G., Meliciani, V., Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Res. Policy 47:6 (2018), 1018–1031, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.005.
Florio, M., Giffoni, F., Giunta, A., Sirtori, E., Big science, learning, and innovation: evidence from CERN procurement. Ind. Corp. Change 27:5 (2018), 915–936, 10.1093/icc/dty029.
Freier, R., Schumann, M., Siedler, T., The earnings returns to graduating with honors — evidence from law graduates. Labour. Econ. 34 (2015), 39–50, 10.1016/j.labeco.2015.03.001.
García-Quevedo, J., Pellegrino, G., Savona, M., Reviving demand-pull perspectives: the effect of demand uncertainty and stagnancy on R&D strategy. Cambridge J. Econ. bew042, 2017, 10.1093/cje/bew042.
Ghisetti, C., Demand-pull and environmental innovations: estimating the effects of innovative public procurement. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 125 (2017), 178–187, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.020.
Goodman-Bacon, A., Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing. Journal of Econometrics 2 (2021), 254–277, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2021.03.014.
Guerzoni, M., Raiteri, E., Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Res. Policy 44:3 (2015), 726–747, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009.
Guiso, L., Parigi, G., Investment and demand uncertainty. Q. J. Econ. 114:1 (1999), 185–227, 10.1162/003355399555981.
Hainmueller, J., Entropy balancing for causal effects: a multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Politic. Anal. 20:1 (2012), 25–46, 10.1093/pan/mpr025.
Hall, P., Löfgren, K., Greening the street-level procurer: challenges in the strongly decentralized Swedish system. J. Consum. Policy 39 (2016), 467–483, 10.1007/s10603-015-9282-8.
Haščič, I., Migotto, M., Measuring Environmental Innovation Using Patent data. OECD Environment Working Papers, 89. 2015, OECD, 10.1787/5js009kf48xw-en.
Hoekman, B., Taş, B.K.O., Procurement policy and SME participation in public purchasing. Small Bus. Econ., 2020, 10.1007/s11187-020-00414-z.
Horbach, J., Rammer, C., Rennings, K., Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecol. Econ. 78 (2012), 112–122, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005.
Hottenrott, H., Lopes-Bento, C., Veugelers, R., Direct and cross scheme effects in a research and development subsidy program. Res. Policy 46:6 (2017), 1118–1132, 10.1016/j.respol.2017.04.004.
Igarashi, M., De Boer, L., Michelsen, O., Investigating the anatomy of supplier selection in green public procurement. J. Clean. Prod. 108:A (2015), 442–450, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.010.
Kesidou, E., Demirel, P., On the drivers of eco-innovations: empirical evidence from the UK. Res. Policy 41:5 (2012), 862–870, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.005.
Kristensen, H.S., Mosgaard, M.A., Remmen, A., Circular public procurement practices in Danish municipalities. J. Clean. Prod., 281, 2021, 124962, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124962.
Lechner, M., The estimation of causal effects by difference-in-difference methods estimation of spatial panels. Found. Trend. Econ. 4:3 (2010), 165–224, 10.1561/0800000014.
Lichtenberg, F.R., The private R&D investment response to federal design and technical competitions. Am. Econ. Rev. 78:3 (1988), 550–559 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1809152.
Lindström, H., Lundberg, S., Marklund, P.-.O., How green public procurement can drive conversion of farmland: an empirical analysis of an organic food policy. Ecol. Econ., 172, 2020, 106622, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106622.
Lingegård, S., Olsson, J.A., Kadefors, A., Uppenberg, S., Sustainable public procurement in large infrastructure projects—policy implementation for carbon emission reductions. Sustainability, 13, 2021, 11182, 10.3390/su132011182.
Lundberg, S., Marklund, P.-.O., Strömbäck, E., Sundström, D., Using public procurement to implement environmental policy: an empirical analysis. Environm. Econ. Policy Stud. 17:4 (2015), 487–520, 10.1007/s10018-015-0102-9.
Ma, Y., Liu, Y., Appolloni, A., Liu, J., Does green public procurement encourage firm's environmental certification practice? The mediation role of top management support. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 28 (2021), 1002–1017, 10.1002/csr.2101.
Moulton, B.R., An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Rev. Econ. Stat. 72:2 (1990), 334–338, 10.2307/2109724.
Mowery, D., Rosenberg, N., The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Res. Policy 8:2 (1979), 102–153, 10.1016/0048-7333(79)90019-2.
Ntsonde, J., Aggeri, F., Stimulating innovation and creating new markets – The potential of circular public procurement. J. Clean. Prod., 308, 2021, 127303, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127303.
Nikolaou, I.E., Loizou, C., The Green Public Procurement in the midst of the economic crisis: is it a suitable policy tool?. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 15:1 (2015), 49–66, 10.1080/1943815X.2014.993657.
Obwegeser, N., Müller, S.D., Innovation and public procurement: terminology, concepts, and applications. Technovation 74–75 (2018), 1–17, 10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.015.
OECD. SMEs in Public Procurement: Practices and Strategies for Shared Benefits. 2018, OECD Public Governance Reviews. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi: 10.1787/9789264307476-en.
Orsatti, G., Perruchas, F., Consoli, D., Quatraro, F., Public procurement, local labor markets and green technological change. evidence from US commuting zones. Environ. Resour. Econ. 75 (2020), 711–739, 10.1007/s10640-020-00405-4.
Oruezabala, G., Rico, J., The impact of sustainable public procurement on supplier management — the case of French public hospitals. Ind. Market. Manag. 41:4 (2012), 573–580.
Peters, B., Rammer, C., Gault, F., Innovation panel surveys in Germany. Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement, 2013, Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA, 135–177.
Peters, M., Schneider, M., Griesshaber, T., Hoffmann, V.H, The impact of technology-push and demand-pull policies on technical change – Does the locus of policies matter?. Res. Policy 41:8 (2012), 1296–1308, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.004.
Popp, D., Environmental policy and innovation: a decade of research. NBER Working Paper 25631. Natl. Bureau Econ. Res., 2019, 10.3386/w25631.
Pouikli, K., Towards mandatory green public procurement (GPP) requirements under the EU Green Deal: reconsidering the role of public procurement as an environmental policy tool. ERA Forum. 21:4 (2021), 699–721, 10.1007/s12027-020-00635-5.
Pindyck, R., Irreversibility, uncertainty and investment. J. Econ. Lit., 1991, 1110–1148 XXIX.
Pindyck, R., Investments of uncertain cost. J. Financ. Econ. 34:1 (1993), 53–76, 10.1016/0304-405X(93)90040-I.
Rainville, A., Standards in green public procurement – A framework to enhance innovation. J. Clean. Prod. 167 (2017), 1029–1037, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.088Rain.
Rainville, A., Stimulating a more Circular economy through public procurement: roles and dynamics of intermediation. Res. Policy, 50(4), 2021, 104193, 10.1016/j.respol.2020.104193.
Rennings, K., Redefining innovation Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 32:2 (2000), 319–332, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3.
Rexhäuser, S., Rammer, C., Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the porter hypothesis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 57 (2014), 145–167, 10.1007/s10640-013-9671-x.
Rietbergen, M.G., Blok, K., Assessing the potential impact of the CO2 Performance Ladder on the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the Netherlands. J. Clean. Prod. 52 (2013), 33–45, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.027.
Rosell, J., Getting the green light on green public procurement: macro and meso determinants. J. Clean. Prod., 279, 2021, 123710, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123710.
Saastamoinen, J., Reijonen, H., Tammi, T., Should SMEs pursue public procurement to improve innovative performance?. Technovation 69 (2018), 2–14, 10.1016/j. technovation.2017.10.003.
Schmookler, J., Invention and Economic Growth. 1966, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Shin, K., Lee, J., Impact of public procurement for innovation on firm productivity. Appl. Econ. Lett, 2021, 10.1080/13504851.2021.1904106.
Simcoe, T., Toffel, M.W, Government green procurement spillovers: evidence from municipal building policies in California. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 68:3 (2014), 411–434, 10.1016/j.jeem.2014.09.001 434.
Slavtchev, V., Wiederhold, S., Does the technological content of government demand matter for private R&D? Evidence from US States. Am. Econ. 8:2 (2016), 45–84, 10.1257/mac.20130069.
Sparrevik, M., Wangen, H.F., Fer, A.M., De Boer, L., Green public procurement - a case study of an innovative building project in Norway. J. Clean. Prod. 188 (2018), 879–887, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.048.
Stojčić, N., Srhoj, S., Coad, A., Innovation procurement as capability-building: evaluating innovation policies in eight Central and Eastern European countries. Eur. Econ. Rev., 121, 2020, 103330.
Stojčić, N., Social and private outcomes of green innovation incentives in European advancing economies. Technovation, 104, 2021, 102270, 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102270.
TED. TED CSV Open Data. NOTES & CODEBOOK. (3.3). 2020.
Tyagi, R., New product introductions and failures under uncertainty. Int. J. Res. Market. 23:2 (2006), 199–213, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.12.001.
Vejaratnam, N., Mohamad, Z.F., Chenayah, S., A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement. J. Public Procur. 20:4 (2020), 451–471, 10.1108/JOPP-02-2020-0013.
Veugelers, R., Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating?. Res. Policy 41:10 (2012), 1770–1778, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.012.
Vigren, A., How many want to drive the bus? Analyzing the number of bids for public transport bus contracts. Transp. Policy (Oxf.) 72 (2018), 138–147, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.08.008.
Wooldridge, J.M., Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. 2nd Ed., 2010, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ye, M., Ma, Y., Liu, J., Why do public sectors perform high-level green public procurement practice? A new insight with fsQCA approach. J. Environ. Plann. Manage, 2021, 10.1080/09640568.2021.1978060.
Yu, C., Morotomi, T., Yu, H., What influences adoption of green award criteria in a public contract? An empirical analysis of 2018 European public procurement contract award notices. Sustainability, 12, 2020, 1261, 10.3390/su12031261.
Zaidi, A.A.H., Mirza, F.M., Hou, F., Ashraf, R.U, Addressing the sustainable development through sustainable procurement: what factors resist the implementation of sustainable procurement in Pakistan?. Socioecon. Plann. Sci., 68, 2019, 100671, 10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.008Appendix.
