Reference : "Do we need an entire course about it?": Evaluating two years of teaching HCI in comp...
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Unpublished conference
Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science
Computational Sciences
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/52632
"Do we need an entire course about it?": Evaluating two years of teaching HCI in computer science
English
Rohles, Björn mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
Doublet, Sophie mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
Bongard, Kerstin mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
Distler, Verena mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
Fourrier, Vincent mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
Sergeeva, Anastasia mailto [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > IRiSC >]
Koenig, Vincent mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
1-May-2022
18
Yes
No
International
EduCHI 2022
April 30 – May 1, 2022
New Orleans, LA
USA
[en] HCI education ; Computer Sciences ; Human-Centered Design ; User Experience
[en] Educators increasingly agree on the importance of teaching Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) to Computer Science (CS) students, but there is debate on how to best integrate HCI into CS curricula. Unfortunately, standard course evaluations typically do not provide sufficient insights for improving HCI classes. In the present article, we used a human-centered design approach to evaluate our HCI classes, building on a qualitative study with CS students from four introductory HCI classes over two years. We report on a qualitative assessment through interviews, photo elicitation and sentence completion. Specifically, we addressed four research questions: which contents were the most relevant, how students experienced the courses, how they view the role of HCI in CS, and which outcomes they perceived from the HCI courses. We gathered rich qualitative insights beyond the standard course evaluations and derived concrete enhancements for future course iterations. We discuss implications for other HCI educators and contribute recommendations for the living HCI curriculum. Furthermore, we reflect on the usefulness of our methodological approach to collect in-depth constructive feedback from students.
Researchers ; Professionals
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/52632

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
educhi2022-final83.pdfPublic version from https://educhi2022.hcilivingcurriculum.org/schedule/Publisher postprint796.52 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.