embodied creativity; affordances; creative process; tool use; pretend play
Résumé :
[en] Why does one need creativity? On a personal level, improvisation with available resources is needed for online coping with unforeseen environmental stimuli when existing knowledge and apparent action strategies do not work. On a cultural level, the exploitation of existing cultural means and norms for the deliberate production of novel and valuable artifacts is a basis for cultural and technological development and extension of human action possibilities across various domains. It is less clear, however, how creativity develops and how exactly one arrives at generating new action possibilities and producing multiple alternative action strategies using familiar objects. In this theoretical paper, we first consider existing accounts of the creative process in the Alternative Uses Task and then present an alternative interpretation, drawing on sociocultural views and an embodied cognition approach. We explore similarities between the psychological processes underlying the generation of new uses in the Alternative Uses Task and children’s pretend play. We discuss possible cognitive mechanisms and speculate how the generation of new action possibilities for common objects in pretend play can be related to adults’ ability to generate new action strategies associated with object use. Implications for creativity development in humans and embodied artificial agents are discussed.
Disciplines :
Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie: Multidisciplinaire, généralités & autres
Auteur, co-auteur :
GUBENKO, Alla ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Education and Social Work (DESW)
HOUSSEMAND, Claude ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Education and Social Work (DESW)
Co-auteurs externes :
no
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Alternative Object Use in Adults and Children: Embodied Cognitive Bases of Creativity
Date de publication/diffusion :
septembre 2022
Titre du périodique :
Frontiers in Psychology
Titre particulier du numéro :
Rising Ideas In: Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology
Adolph K. E. Robinson S. R. (2015). “Motor development,” in Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.), 1–45.
Agostini A. Aein M. Szedmak S. Aksoy E. E. Piater J. Worgotter F. (2015). “Using structural bootstrapping for object substitution in robotic executions of human-like manipulation tasks.” in 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). September 28 - October 2, 2015.
Alessandroni N. (2021). Object concepts and their functional core: Material engagement and canonical uses of objects in early childhood education. Hu. Arenas 4, 172–195. doi: 10.1007/s42087-020-00119-5
Alessandroni N. Rodríguez C. (2019). On perception as the basis for object concepts: a critical analysis. Pragmat. Cogn. 26, 321–356. doi: 10.1075/pc.19027.ale
Andersen M. M. Kiverstein J. Miller M. Roepstorff A. (2021). Play in predictive minds: a cognitive theory of play. PsyArXiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.31234/osf.io/u86qy
Antunes A. Jamone L. Saponaro G. Bernardino A. Ventura R. (2016). “From human instructions to robot actions: formulation of goals, affordances and probabilistic planning.” in Proc. IEEE ICRA. May 16-21, 2016; 5449–5454.
Armitage K. L. Redshaw J. (2022). Children boost their cognitive performance with a novel offloading technique. Child Dev. 93, 25–38. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13664, PMID: 34510416
Awaad I. Kraetzschmar G. K. Hertzberg J. (2015). The role of functional affordances in socializing robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 421–438. doi: 10.1007/s12369-015-0281-3
Ball L. J. Christensen B. T. (2009). Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Des. Stud. 30, 169–186. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2008.12.005
Barsalou L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Mem. Cogn. 11, 211–227. doi: 10.3758/BF03196968, PMID: 6621337
Barsalou L. W. (1991). “Deriving categories to achieve goals,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Vol. 27. ed. Bower G. H. (London: Academic Press).
Behne T. Carpenter M. Tomasello M. (2014). Young children create iconic gestures to inform others. Dev. Psychol. 50, 2049–2060. doi: 10.1037/a0037224, PMID: 24979473
Belza H. Herrán E. Anguera M. T. (2020). Early childhood, breakfast, and related tools: analysis of adults’ function as mediators. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 35, 495–527. doi: 10.1007/s10212-019-00438-4
Benedek M. Jauk E. Sommer M. Arendasy M. Neubauer A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence 46, 73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007, PMID: 25278640
Berthold M. R. (ed.) (2012). Bisociative Knowledge Discovery: An Introduction to Concept, Algorithms, Tools, and Applications. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Boden M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artif. Intell. 103, 347–356. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00055-1
Bødker S. (1997). Computers in mediated human activity. Mind Cult. Act. 4, 149–158. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca0403_2
Bodrova E. Leong D. J. (2007). Tools of the Mind: The Vygotskian Approach to Early Childhood Education. 2nd Edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Borghi A. M. Barca L. Binkofski F. Castelfranchi C. Pezzulo G. Tummolini L. (2019). Words as social tools: language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts. Phys Life Rev 29, 120–153. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.12.001, PMID: 30573377
Bruner J. S. (1975). Play is serious business. Psychol. Today 1, 81–83.
Buxbaum L. J. (2016). Learning, remembering, and predicting how to use tools: Distributed neurocognitive mechanism. Comment on Osiurak and Badets, 124, 346–360. doi: 10.1037/rev0000051
Buxbaum L. J. Schwartz M. F. Carew T. G. (1997). The role of memory in object use. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 14, 219–254. doi: 10.1080/026432997381565
Campbell D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychol. Rev. 67, 380–400. doi: 10.1037/h0040373
Cangelosi A. Schlesinger M. Smith L. B. (2015). Developmental Robotics: From Babies to Robots. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carbonell J. G. (1983). “Learning by analogy: formulating and generalizing plans from past experience,” in Machine Learning. Symbolic Computation. eds. Michalski R. S. Carbonell J. G. Mitchell T. M. (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer), 137–161.
Chalmers D. J. French R. M. Hofstadter D. R. (1992). High-level perception, representation, and analogy: A critique of artificial intelligence methodology. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 4, 185–211. doi: 10.1080/09528139208953747
Chu V. Fitzgerald T. Thomaz A. L. (2016). “Learning object affordances by leveraging the combination of human-guidance and self-exploration.” in 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). March 7-10, 2016; 221–228.
Chylińska M. Gut A. (2020). Pretend play as a creative action: on the exploratory and evaluative features of children’s pretense. Theory Psychol. 30, 548–566. doi: 10.1177/0959354320931594
Cisek P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 362, 1585–1599. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2054, PMID: 17428779
Clark A. (1998). Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Clark A. Toribio J. (1994). Doing without representing? Synthese 101, 401–431. doi: 10.1007/BF01063896
Cole M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Cole M. Engestrom Y. (1993). “A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition,” in Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. ed. Salomon G. (New York: Cambridge University Press), 1–46.
Costall A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. Avant. 3, 85–93.
Collins A. Koechlin E. (2012). Reasoning, learning, and creativity: frontal lobe function and human decision-making. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001293, PMID: 22479152
Dansky J. L. (1980). Make-believe: a mediator of the relationship between play and associative fluency. Child Dev. 51, 576–579. doi: 10.2307/1129296
Dansky J. L. Silverman I. W. (1973). Effects of play on associative fluency in preschool-aged children. Dev. Psychol. 9, 38–43. doi: 10.1037/h0035076
Dansky J. L. Silverman I. W. (1975). Play: a general facilitator of associative fluency. Dev. Psychol. 11:104. doi: 10.1037/h0076108
Dautenhahn K. (2007). Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 362, 679–704. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.2004, PMID: 17301026
Davidson J. E. Sternberg R. J. (1986). What is insight? Educ. Horiz. 64, 177–179.
Davydov V. V. (1992). Genezis i razvitie lischnosti v detskom vozraste [The genesis and development of personality in the child age]. Voprocy Psykjologii [Questions of Psychology] 1, 22–33.
Defeyter M. A. German T. P. (2003). Acquiring an understanding of design: evidence from children’s insight problem solving. Cognition 89, 133–155. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00098-2, PMID: 12915298
Dent-Read C. H. (1997). “A naturalistic study of metaphor development: seeing and seeing as,” in Evolving Explanations of Development: Ecological Approaches to Organism–Environment Systems. eds. Dent-Read C. E. Zukow-Goldring P. E. (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 255–296.
Dietrich A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11, 1011–1026. doi: 10.3758/BF03196731
Dimitrova N. Moro C. Mohr C. (2015). Caregivers interpret infants’ early gestures based on shared knowledge about referents. Infant Behav. Dev. 39, 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.02.015, PMID: 25827260
Duncker K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychol. Monogr. 58, i–113. doi: 10.1037/h0093599
El’konin D. B. (1978). Psychologija igry [Psychology of Play]. Moscow: Pedagogika.
Engeström Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström Y. (1995). Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: an activity-theoretical perspective. Artif. Intell. Med. 7, 395–412. doi: 10.1016/0933-3657(95)00012-U, PMID: 8547965
Engeström Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward activity-theoretical reconceptualization. J. Educ. Work. 14, 133–156. doi: 10.1080/13639080020028747
Engeström Y. (2007). “Putting vygotsky to work: the change laboratory as an application of double stimulation,” in The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. eds. Daniels H. Cole M. Wertsch J. V. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 363–382.
Favela L. H. Amon M. J. Lobo L. Chemero A. (2021). Empirical evidence for extended cognitive systems. Cogn. Sci. 45:e13060. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13060, PMID: 34762738
Finke R. A. (1989). Principles of Mental Imagery. London, England: The MIT Press.
Fong T. Nourbakhsh I. Dautenhahn K. (2002). A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots: Concepts, Design, and Applications. Technical report no. CMU-RI-TR-02-29. Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
Galinsky A. D. Moskowitz G. B. (2000). Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36, 384–409. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1409
Gallagher S. (2017). Enactivist Interventions: Rethinking the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gentner D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cogn. Sci. 7, 155–170.
Gibson J. J. (1979). Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gick M. L. Holyoak K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cogn. Psychol. 15, 1–38. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
Gilhooly K. J. Fioratou E. Anthony S. H. Wynn V. (2007). Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. Br. J. Psychol. 98, 611–625. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2007.tb00467.x
Gill T. M. (2010). Conceptual Blending, Metaphors, and the Construction of Meaning in Ice Age Europe: An Inquiry Into the Viability of Applying Theories of Cognitive Science to Human History in Deep Time (Doctoral Dissertation, UC Berkeley).
Glăveanu V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas Psychol. 28, 79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007
Glăveanu V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. J. Theory Soc. Behav. 41, 48–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00445.x
Glăveanu V. P. (2012). What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects, and the theory of affordances. J. Creat. Behav. 46, 192–208. doi: 10.1002/jocb.13
Glăveanu V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: the five A’s framework. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 17, 69–81. doi: 10.1037/a0029528
Glăveanu V. P. (2020). A sociocultural theory of creativity: bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 24, 335–354. doi: 10.1177/1089268020961763
Goldin-Meadow S. (2003). Hearing Gesture: How Our Hands Help Us Think. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Gubenko A. Houssemand C. (in press). “Towards a framework for human-robot co-creation.” in Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022. August 16-19, 2022.
Gubenko A. Kirsch C. Smilek J. N. Lubart T. Houssemand C. (2021). Educational robotics and robot creativity: an interdisciplinary dialogue. Front. Robot. AI 8:662030. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.662030
Gubenko A. Lubart T. Houssemand C. (in press). “From social robots to creative humans and back.” in Proceedings Int. Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC). June 27-July 1, 2022.
Guilford J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Haier R. J. Jung R. E. (2008). Brain imaging studies of intelligence and creativity: what is the picture for education? Roeper Rev. 30, 171–180. doi: 10.1080/02783190802199347
Hammond K.R. (1981). Principles of Organization in Intuitive and Analytical Cognition (Technical Report 231). Center for Research on Judgement and Policy. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.
Harris P. L. Kavanaugh R. D. Wellman H. M. Hickling A. K. (1993). Young children‘s understanding of pretense. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 58, i–107. doi: 10.2307/1166074
Hoicka E. Berg S. Kerr T. Carberry M. (2013). “The unusual box test: a non-verbal, non-representational divergent thinking test for toddlers.” in AAAI Spring Symposium Series. March 25-27, 2013.
Humphreys G. W. (2001). Objects, affordances, action. Psychologist 14, 408–412.
Jeannerod M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 14, S103–S109. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832
Johnson-Laird P. N. (1987). Reasoning, imagining, and creating. Bull. Br. Psychol. Soc. 40, 121–129.
Kahneman D. Tversky A. (1982). “The simulation heuristic,” in Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. eds. Kahneman D. Slovic P. Tversky A. (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press), 201–208.
Kaptelinin V. Nardi B. A. (2006). Acting With Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Katz A. N. Hussey K. A. (2011). “Psycholinguistics,” in Encyclopedia of Creativity: Two-Volume Set: Online Version (2nd Edn.), eds. Runco M. A. Pritzker S. R. (Academic Press), 271–278.
Kaufman J. C. Plucker J. A. Baer J. (2008). Essentials of Creativity Assessment. 1st Edn. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Keen R. (2011). The development of problem solving in young children: a critical cognitive skill. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 1–21. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.031809.130730, PMID: 20822435
Kemler Nelson D. G. (1999). Attention to functional properties in toddlers’ naming and problem-solving. Cogn. Dev. 14, 77–100. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2014(99)80019-7
Kemler Nelson D. G. Russell R. Duke N. Jones K. (2000). Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. Child Dev. 71, 1271–1288. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00228, PMID: 11108096
Kendon A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kenett Y. N. Anaki D. Faust M. (2014). Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:407. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00407, PMID: 24959129
Kiverstein J. D. Rietveld E. (2018). Reconceiving representation-hungry cognition: an ecological-enactive proposal. Adapt. Behav. 26, 147–163. doi: 10.1177/1059712318772778, PMID: 30135620
Klahr D. Dunbar K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 12, 1–48. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1201_1
Koestler A. (1964). The Act of Creation. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Kolodner J. L. (1992). An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 6, 3–34. doi: 10.1007/bf00155578
Kosslyn S. M. (1980). Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kravtsova E. E. (1996). Razbudi v rebenke volshebnika [Wake Up a Wizard in a Child]. Moscow. Prosveschenie.
Krunic V. Salvi G. Bernardino A. Montesano L. Santos-Victor J. (2009). “Affordance based word-to-meaning association.” in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. May 12-17, 2009.
Kumar S. Giagkos A. Shaw P. Braud R. Lee M. Shen Q. (2021). Discovering schema-based action sequences through play in situated humanoid robots. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Develop. Syst. doi: 10.1109/TCDS.2021.3094513
Landau B. Smith L. B. Jones S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cogn. Dev. 3, 299–321. doi: 10.1016/0885-2014(88)90014-7
LeBoutillier N. Marks D. F. (2003). Mental imagery and creativity: a meta-analytic review study. Br. J. Psychol. 94, 29–44. doi: 10.1348/000712603762842084
Lee C. S. Therriault D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: a latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence 41, 306–320. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008
Leont’ev A. N. (1975). Dejatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Politizdat.
Leont’ev A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Li A. K. (1978). Effects of play on novel responses in kindergarten children. Alberta J. Educ. Res. 24, 31–36.
Lindblom J. Ziemke T. (2003). Social situatedness of natural and artificial intelligence: Vygotsky and beyond. Adapt. Behav. 11, 79–96. doi: 10.1177/10597123030112002
Lobo M. A. Galloway J. C. (2008). Postural and object-oriented experiences advance early reaching, object exploration, and means-end behavior. Child Dev. 79, 1869–1890. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01231.x, PMID: 19037955
Lockman J. J. (2000). A perception-action perspective on tool use development. Child Dev. 71, 137–144. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00127, PMID: 10836567
Lockman J. J. Kahrs B. A. (2017). New insights into the development of human tool use. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26, 330–334. doi: 10.1177/0963721417692035, PMID: 28943723
Lubart T. Esposito D. Gubenko A. Houssemand C. (2021). Creativity in humans, robots, humbots. Creat. Theor. - Res. - Appl. 8, 23–37. doi: 10.2478/ctra-2021-0003
Luchins A. (1942). Mechanisms of problem solving: the effect of Einstellung. Psychol. Monogr. 54, i–95. doi: 10.1037/h0093502
Lungarella M. Metta G. Pfeifer R. Sandini G. (2004). Developmental robotics: a survey. Connect. Sci. 15, 151–190. doi: 10.1080/09540090310001655110
Malafouris L. (2014). Creative thinging: the feeling of and for clay. Pragmat. Cogn. 22, 140–158. doi: 10.1075/pc.22.1.08mal
Malafouris L. (2018). “Bringing things to mind: 4Es and material engagement,” in The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. eds. Newen A. L. De Bruin Gallagher S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 754–772.
Malafouris L. (2019). Mind and material engagement. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 18, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s11097-018-9606-7, PMID: 31523220
Malafouris L. (2021). How does thinking relate to tool making? Adapt. Behav. 29, 107–121. doi: 10.1177/1059712320950539
Malinin L. H. (2019). How radical is embodied creativity? Implications of 4E approaches for creativity research and teaching. Front. Psychol. 10:2372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02372, PMID: 31695653
Mangalam M. Fragaszy D. M. Wagman J. B. Day B. M. Kelty-Stephen D. G. Bongers R. M. et al. (2022). On the psychological origins of tool use. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 134:104521. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104521, PMID: 34998834
Matheson H. E. Kenett Y. N. (2020). The role of the motor system in generating creative thoughts. NeuroImage 213:116697. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116697, PMID: 32142883
Matheson H. Kenett Y. N. (2021). A novel coding scheme for assessing responses in divergent thinking: an embodied approach. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 15, 412–425. doi: 10.1037/aca0000297, PMID: 34567335
McCrae R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 52, 1258–1265. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
McNeill D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Mednick S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychol. Rev. 69, 220–232. doi: 10.1037/h0048850, PMID: 14472013
Mednick S. A. (1968). The remote associates test. J. Creat. Behav. 2, 213–214. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1968.tb00104.x
Meyer M. L. Hershfield H. E. Waytz A. G. Mildner J. N. Tamir D. I. (2019). Creative expertise is associated with transcending the here and now. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 116, 483–494. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000148, PMID: 30714758
Miettinen R. (1999). The riddle of things: activity theory and actor-network theory as approaches to studying innovations. Mind Cult. Act. 6, 170–195. doi: 10.1080/10749039909524725
Miettinen R. Virkkunen J. (2005). Epistemic objects, artefacts and organizational change. Organization 12, 437–456. doi: 10.1177/1350508405051279
Moro C. Rodríguez C. (2005). L’objet et la construction de son usage chez le bébé: Une approche sémiotique du développement préverbal. Peter Lang, Berne/New York.
Mumford M. D. Mobley M. I. Reiter-Palmon R. Uhlman C. E. Doares L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creat. Res. J. 4, 91–122.
Nair L. Chernova S. (2020). Feature guided search for creative problem solving through tool construction. Front. Robot. AI 7:592382. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.592382
Neemeh Z. A. (2019). “Cultural affordances in AI perception.” in CogSci. July 24-27, 2441–2446.
Nelson K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychol. Rev. 81, 267–285. doi: 10.1037/h0036592
Newen A. De Bruin L. Gallagher S. (eds.) (2018). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Noë A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nonaka T. Goldfield E. C. (2018). Mother-infant interaction in the emergence of a tool-using skill at mealtime: a process of affordance selection. Ecol. Psychol. 30, 278–298. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2018.1438199
Nonaka T. Stoffregen T. A. (2020). Social interaction in the emergence of toddler’s mealtime spoon use. Dev. Psychobiol. 62, 1124–1133. doi: 10.1002/dev.21978, PMID: 32383216
Nusbaum E. C. Silvia P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different?: fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence 39, 36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002
Nyga D. Roy S. Paul R. Park D. Pomarlan M. Beetz M. (2018). “Grounding robot plans from natural language instructions with incomplete world knowledge.” in Conference on Robot Learning (Zurich). July 24-27, 714–723.
Osiurak F. Badets A. (2016). Tool use and affordance: manipulation-based versus reasoning-based approaches. Psychol. Rev. 123, 534–568. doi: 10.1037/rev0000027, PMID: 26881695
Osiurak F. Jarry C. Allain P. Aubin G. Etcharry-Bouyx F. Richard I. et al. (2009). Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage. The technical reasoning model. Cortex 45, 769–783. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.013, PMID: 19084221
Palacios P. Rodríguez C. (2015). The development of symbolic uses of objects in infants in a triadic context: a pragmatic and semiotic perspective. Infant Child Dev. 24, 23–43. doi: 10.1002/icd.1873
Pellegrini A. D. (2013). Object use in childhood: development and possible functions. Behaviour 150, 813–843. doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003086
Pellegrini A. D. Hou Y. (2011). The development of preschool children's (Homo sapiens) uses of objects and their role in peer group centrality. J. Comp. Psychol. 125, 239–245. doi: 10.1037/a0023046, PMID: 21604856
Pezzulo G. Barsalou L. W. Cangelosi A. Fischer M. H. McRae K. Spivey M. J. (2013). Computational grounded cognition: a new alliance between grounded cognition and computational modeling. Front. Psychol. 3:612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00612, PMID: 23346065
Rakoczy H. Tomasello M. (2006). Two-year-olds grasp the intentional structure of pretense acts. Dev. Sci. 9, 557–564. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00533.x, PMID: 17059452
Ramstead M. J. D. Veissière S. P. L. Kirmayer L. J. (2016). Cultural affordances: scaffolding local worlds through shared intentionality and regimes of attention. Front. Psychol. 7:1090. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01090, PMID: 27507953
Rietveld E. Denys D. Van Westen M. (2018). “Ecological-enactive cognition as engaging with a field of relevant affordances: The skilled intentionality framework (SIF),” in The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. eds. Newen A. L. De Bruin Gallaghe S. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 40–70.
Rietveld E. Kiverstein J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecol. Psychol. 26, 325–352. doi: 10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
Rochat P. Reed E. S. (1987). Le concept d’affordance et les conaissances du nourrisson. Psychol. Fr. 32, 97–104.
Rodríguez C. Palacios P. Cárdenas K. Yuste N. (2014). “Les symboles: Des formes de second ou de troisiéme sens?” in Sémiotique, Culture Et Développement Psychologique. eds. Moro C. Müller-Mirza N. (Lausanne: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion), 99–116.
Rossmanith N. Costall A. Reichelt A. F. López B. Reddy V. (2014). Jointly structuring triadic spaces of meaning and action: book sharing from 3 months on. Front. Psychol. 5:1390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01390
Roy D. Hsiao K.-Y. Mavridis N. (2004). Mental imagery for a conversational robot. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst. 34, 1374–1383. doi: 10.1109/tsmcb.2004.823327, PMID: 15484910
Russ S. W. Christian K. M. (2011). “Play,” in Encyclopedia of Creativity: Two-Volume Set: Online Version. 2nd Edn. eds. Runco M. A. Pritz S. R. (Academic Press), 238–243.
Sanches de Oliveira G. Raja V. Chemero A. (2019). Radical embodied cognitive science and ‘real cognition’. Synthese 198, 115–136. doi: 10.1007/s11229-019-02475-4
Sannino A. (2015). The principle of double stimulation: a path to volitional action. Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact. 6, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001
Schacter D. L. Addis D. R. Hassabis D. Martin V. C. Spreng R. N. Szpunar K. K. (2012). The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain. Neuron 76, 677–694. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001, PMID: 23177955
Schacter D. L. Benoit R. G. Szpunar K. K. (2017). Episodic future thinking: mechanisms and functions. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 17, 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.06.002, PMID: 29130061
Schulz L. E. (2015). Infants explore the unexpected. Science 348, 42–43. doi: 10.1126/science.aab0582
Shepard R. N. Metzler J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171, 701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3972.701
Shridhar M. Mittal D. Hsu D. (2020). INGRESS: interactive visual grounding of referring expressions. Int. J. Robot. Res. 39, 217–232. doi: 10.1177/0278364919897133
Smith L. B. (2005). Action alters shape categories. Cogn. Sci. 29, 665–679. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_13, PMID: 21702789
Smith P. K. Dutton S. (1979). Play and training in direct and innovative problem solving. Child Dev. 50, 830–836. doi: 10.2307/1128950
Spearman C. (1931). Creative Mind. New York: Appleton-Century.
Spiridonov V. Loginov N. Ivanchei I. Kurgansky A. V. (2019). The role of motor activity in insight problem solving (the case of the nine-dot problem). Front. Psychol. 10:2. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00002, PMID: 30728789
Srinivasan M. Rabagliati H. (2021). The implications of polysemy for theories of word learning. Child Dev. Perspect. 15, 148–153. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12411
Stahl A. E. Feigenson L. (2015). Observing the unexpected enhances infants’ learning and exploration. Science 348, 91–94. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa3799, PMID: 25838378
Starr A. Cirolia A. J. Tillman K. A. Srinivasan M. (2021). Spatial metaphor facilitates word learning. Child Dev. 92, e329–e342. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13477, PMID: 33355926
Sternberg R. J. (1986a). Intelligence Applied. Orlando. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.
Sternberg R. J. (1986b). Toward a unified theory of human reasoning. Intelligence 10, 281–314. doi: 10.1016/0160-2896(86)90001-2
Sternberg R. J. (1999). The theory of successful intelligence. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 3, 292–316. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292
Sternberg R. J. Lubart T. I. (1995). Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. New York: Free Press.
Strasheim J. J. (1926). A New Method of Mental Testing. Baltimore: Warwick & York.
Szokolszky A. Read C. (2021). Pretend play with objects: an ecological approach. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s11097-021-09755-w
Tolar T. D. Lederberg A. R. Gokhale S. Tomasello M. (2008). The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs. J. Deaf. Stud. Deaf. Educ. 13, 225–240. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enm045, PMID: 17827446
Tomasello M. (1999). “The cultural ecology of young children’s interactions with objects and artifacts,” in Ecological Approaches to Cognition: Essays in Honor of Ulric Neisser. eds. Winograd E. Fivush R. Hirst W. (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 153–170.
Tomasello M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Tomasello M. Striano T. Rochat P. (1999). Do young children use objects as 8 symbols? Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 17, 563–584. doi: 10.1348/026151099165483
Torrance E. P. (1981). Thinking Creatively in Action and Movement. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
Van der Veer R. Valsiner J. (eds.) (1991). “Vygotsky and gestalt psychology,” in Understanding Vygotsky (Oxford: Backwell), 155–180.
Vicente K. J. Rasmussen J. (1990). The ecology of human-machine systems II: mediating direct perception'in complex work domains. Ecol. Psychol. 2, 207–249. doi: 10.1207/s15326969eco0203_2
Vygotsky L. S. (1967). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. Sov. Psychol. 5, 6–18. doi: 10.2753/rpo1061-040505036
Vygotsky L. S. (1983). History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions. Vol. 3. Moscow: Pedagogika.
Vygotsky L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Wagman J. B. Caputo S. E. Stoffregen T. A. (2016). Hierarchical nesting of affordances in a tool use task. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 42, 1627–1642. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000251
Wallach M. A. (1970). “Creativity,” in Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology. (Vol. 1). ed. Mussen P. H. (New York: Wiley).
Wallach M. A. Kogan N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence Distinction. NYC: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Wiedenbauer G. Jansen-Osmann P. (2008). Manual training of mental rotation in children. Learn. Instr. 18, 30–41. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.009
Wilhelm O. Kyllonen P. (2021). To predict the future, consider the past: revisiting Carroll (1993) as a guide to the future of intelligence research. Intelligence 89:101585. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2021.101585
Wilson M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9, 625–636. doi: 10.3758/BF03196322, PMID: 12613670
Wilson R. C. Guilford J. Christensen P. R. (1953). The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychol. Bull. 50, 362–370. doi: 10.1037/h0060857, PMID: 13100527
Withagen R. Van Der Kamp J. (2018). An ecological approach to creativity in making. New Ideas Psychol. 49, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.11.002
Witt J. K. Proffitt D. R. (2008). Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 34, 1479–1492. doi: 10.1037/a0010781, PMID: 19045987
Xu Y. Malt B. C. Srinivasan M. (2017). Evolution of word meanings through metaphorical mapping: systematicity over the past millennium. Cogn. Psychol. 96, 41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.005, PMID: 28601710
Ye L. Cardwell W. Mark L. S. (2009). Perceiving multiple affordances for objects. Ecol. Psychol. 21, 185–217. doi: 10.1080/10407410903058229
Yoon E. Y. Heinke D. Humphreys G. W. (2002). Modelling direct perceptual constraints on action selection: the naming and action model (NAM). Vis. Cogn. 9, 615–661. doi: 10.1080/13506280143000601
Zabelina D. (2018). “Attention and creativity,” in The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity. eds. Vartanian O. Jung R. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 161–179.
Zabelina D. L. Robinson M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 4, 136–143. doi: 10.1037/a0017379
