Female Comparative Disadvantage; Human Development; Social Index Numbers
Résumé :
[en] Female comparative disadvantage refers to the mismatch of the female with respect to achievements in different dimensions of human well-being in comparison with the corresponding achievements of the male. This paper axiomatically derives a general family of female comparative disadvantage indicators which has very important policy implications. The axioms employed are shown to be ‘independent’. An empirical illustration of the general index is provided using the UNDP data on mean years of schooling, life expectancy at birth and gross national income per capita in 2018. Results show that female comparative disadvantage is not necessarily related to standard measures of human development, such as the HDI, and is present even in countries reaching very high human development. The factor where policy intervention is needed the most is income.
Disciplines :
Economie sociale
Auteur, co-auteur :
Chakravarty, Satya; Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India
Chattopadhyay, Nachiketa; Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, India
d'Ambrosio, Conchita ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
An Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Comparative Female Disadvantage
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476–487. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
Alkire, S., Foster, J., Seth, S., Santos, M. E., Roche, J. M., & Ballon, P. (2015). Multidimensional poverty measurement and analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689491.001.0001
Anand, S. (2018). Recasting human development measures. Discussion Paper, UNDP.
Anand, S., & Sen, A. (1995). Gender inequality in human development: Theories and measurement. In UNDP, Background papers: Human Development Report1995, United Nations Development Programme, New York, 1996, pp. 1–19. [Previously published in August 1995 as HDRO Occasional Paper 19 for Human Development Report 1995.]
Bourguignon, F., & Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). The measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 1, 25–49. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023913831342
Chakravarty, S. R. (1983). A new index of poverty. Mathematical Social Sciences, 6, 307–313. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4896(83)90064-1
Chakravarty, S. R. (2003). A generalized human development index. Review of Development Economics, 7, 99–114. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9361.00178
Chakravarty, S. R. (2011). A reconsideration of the tradeoffs in the new human development index. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 471–474. DOI: 10.1007/s10888-011-9190-3
Chakravarty, S. R. (2018). Analyzing multidimensional wellbeing: A quantitative approach. Wiley.
Decancq, K., & Lugo, M. A. (2012). Inequality of well-being: A multidimensional approach. Economica, 79, 721–746.
Dijkstra, A. G., & Hanmer, L. C. (2000). Measuring socio-economic gender inequality: Toward an alternative to the UNDP gender-related development index. Feminist Economics, 6, 41–75. DOI: 10.1080/13545700050076106
Foster, J. E., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica, 42, 761–766. DOI: 10.2307/1913475
Gajdos, T., & Weymark, J. A. (2005). Multidimensional generalized Gini indices. Economic Theory, 26, 471–496. DOI: 10.1007/s00199-004-0529-x
Jensen, J. L. W. V. (1906). Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes. Acta Mathematica, 30, 175–193. DOI: 10.1007/BF02418571
Kakwani, N. C. (1980). On a class of poverty measures. Econometrica, 48, 437–444. DOI: 10.2307/1911106
Klasen, S., & Schüler, D. (2011). Reforming the gender-related index and the gender empowerment measure: Implementing some specific proposals. Feminist Economics, 17, 1–30. DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2010.541860
Kolm, S. C. (1977). Multidimensional egalitarianism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1–13. DOI: 10.2307/1883135
Lasso de la Vega, M. C., & Urrutia, A. M. (2012). A note on multidimensional distribution-sensitive poverty axioms. Research on Economic Inequality, 20, 161–173. DOI: 10.1108/S1049-2585(2012)0000020010
Niculescu, C. P., & Persson, L.-E. (2006). Convex functions on intervals. In Convex functions and their applications: A contemporary approach, CMSBM (pp. 7–64). Springer.
Permanyer, I. (2010). The measurement of multidimensional gender inequality: Continuing the debate. Social Indicators Research, 95, 181–198. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-009-9463-4
Permanyer, I. (2013). A critical assessment of the UNDP’s gender inequality index. Feminist Economics, 19, 1–32. DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2013.769687
Ponthieux, S., & Meurs, D. (2015). Gender inequality. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 981–1146). Elsevier.
Ravallion, M. (2012). Troubling tradeoffs in the human development index. Journal of Development Economics, 99, 201–209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.01.003
Schüler, D. (2006). The uses and misuses of the gender-related development index and gender empowerment measure: A review of the literature. Journal of Human Development, 7, 161–181. DOI: 10.1080/14649880600768496
Sen, A. (1976). Poverty: An ordinal approach to measurement. Econometrica, 44, 219–231. DOI: 10.2307/1912718
Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. CMEPSP.
Tsui, K.-Y. (1998). Multidimensional inequality and multidimensional generalized entropy measures: An axiomatic derivation. Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 145–157. DOI: 10.1007/s003550050136
Tsui, K.-Y. (2002). Multidimensional poverty indices. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 69–93. DOI: 10.1007/s355-002-8326-3
UNDP. (2010). Human development report 2010—20th anniversary edition. The real wealth of nations: pathways to human development. United Nations Development Programme.
UNDP. (2015). Human development report. United Nations Development Programme.
