Reference : EU Law and the ECT as Distinct and Separate Legal Regimes: A Case Comment on Eskosol ...
Scientific journals : Article
Law, criminology & political science : European & international law
Law / European Law
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/50089
EU Law and the ECT as Distinct and Separate Legal Regimes: A Case Comment on Eskosol v Italy, Decision on Request for Immediate Termination and Jurisdictional Objection Based on the Inapplicability of the ECT to Intra-EU Disputes, 7 May 2019
English
Happold, Matthew mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL) >]
21-Oct-2021
ICSID Review
Oxford University Press
36
2
278-285
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
0258-3690
2049-1999
Oxford
UK
[en] Investor_State dispute settlement ; Energy Charter Treaty ; EU law ; Achmea judgment
[en] This case comment examines the decision of the tribunal in Eskosol v Italy rejecting the respondent’s jurisdictional objections based on the inapplicability of the Energy Charter Treaty to intra-EU disputes. In particular, it examines the tribunal's construction of a division between EU law and the ECT, emphasizing the separate and distinct characters of the two regimes, with the twin ambitions of making intra-EU arbitration under the ECT less objectionable from an EU law perspective while maintaining the autonomy of ECT arbitral tribunals. Whether the tribunal's first objective is feasible, however, is doubted and the extent to which intra-EU arbitration under the ECT has a future questioned.
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/50089
https://academic.oup.com/icsidreview/article-abstract/36/2/278/6409956

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Limited access
Happold ICISD case comment 2021 revised proof.pdfPublisher postprint103.71 kBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.