Reference : Argumentation in Trust Services within a Blockchain Environment
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/50021
Argumentation in Trust Services within a Blockchain Environment
English
Yu, Liuwen mailto [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > PI VDT >]
Zichichi, Mirko mailto [Universidad Politécnica de Madrid]
Najjar, Amro mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Computer Science (DCS) >]
Markovich, Réka mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Computer Science (DCS) >]
2021
Proceedings of the 33rd Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 30th Belgian Dutch Conference on Machine Learning (BNAIC/BENELEARN 2021)
Leiva, Luis A. mailto
Pruski, Cedric mailto
Najjar, Amro mailto
Markovich, Réka mailto
Schommer, Christoph mailto
1-21
Yes
33rd Benelux Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 30th Belgian Dutch Conference on Machine Learning (BNAIC/BENELEARN 2021)
from 10-11-2021 to 12-11-2021
Schifflange
Luxembourg
[en] trust services ; argumentation ; negotiation ; blockchain ; smart contracts ; artificial intelligence
[en] Both argumentation and trust concern multi-lateral uncertainties, while argumentation owns the ability to enhance trust in many ways. In the field of trust service where the trustee administers financial assets on behalf of principals, trust is an indispensable element. Often, the trustees withhold the investment plans and of which the decision-making process from their principals such that these services lack of transparency, documentation, traceability, and inclusive decision-making mechanisms. In this paper, we integrate formal argumentation within a blockchain framework. Both argumentation and blockchain have distinctive features that complement each other. They together make the decision-making of the trustees transparent and traceable in order to gain trust and confidence in principals. We introduce three possible architectures and we evaluate and compare them considering different technical, financial, and legal aspects. Specifically, we discuss the role of argumentation in building trust between trustees and their principals.
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/50021

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Argumentation in Trust Services within a Blockchain Environment.pdfAuthor preprint429.95 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.