Article (Périodiques scientifiques)
Comparative analysis of different environmental loading methods and their impacts on the GPS height time series
Jiang, Weiping; LI, Zhao; VAN DAM, Tonie et al.
2013In Journal of Geodesy, 87 (7), p. 687-703
Peer reviewed
 

Documents


Texte intégral
jiang_et_al_j_geod_2013.pdf
Postprint Éditeur (2.14 MB)
Demander un accès

Tous les documents dans ORBilu sont protégés par une licence d'utilisation.

Envoyer vers



Détails



Mots-clés :
Environmental loading; GGFC; QOCA; GPS height coordinate time series
Résumé :
[en] Three different environmental loading methods are used to estimate surface displacements and correct nonlinear variations in a set of GPS weekly height time series. Loading data are provided by (1) Global Geophysical Fluid Center (GGFC), (2) Loading Model of Quasi-Observation CombinationAnalysis software (QLM) and (3) our own daily loading time series (we call itOMDfor optimum model data). We find that OMD has the smallest scatter in height across the selected 233 globally distributed GPS reference stations, GGFC has the next smallest variability, and QLM has the largest scatter. By removing the load-induced height changes from the GPS height time series, we are able to reduce the scatter on 74, 64 and 41 % of the stations using the OMD models, the GGFC model and QLM model respectively. We demonstrate that the discrepancy between the center of earth (CE) and the center of figure (CF) reference frames can be ignored. The most important differences between the predicted models are caused by (1) differences in the hydrol- ogy data from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP) vs. those from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), (2) grid interpolation, and (3) whether the topographic effect is removed or not. Both QLM and GGFC are extremely convenient tools for non-specialists to use to calculate loading effects. Due to the limitation ofNCEP reanalysis hydrology data compared with theGLDAS model, theGGFCdataset is much more suitable thanQLMfor applying environmental loading corrections to GPS height time series. However, loading results for Greenland from GGFC should be discarded since hydrology data from GLDAS in this region are not accurate. The QLM model is equivalent to OMD in Greenland and, hence, could be used as a complement to the GGFC product to model the load in this region. We find that the predicted loading from all three models cannot reduce the scatter of the height coordinate for some stations in Europe.
Centre de recherche :
ULHPC - University of Luxembourg: High Performance Computing
Disciplines :
Sciences de la terre & géographie physique
Auteur, co-auteur :
Jiang, Weiping
LI, Zhao ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit
VAN DAM, Tonie ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit
Ding, Wenwu
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Comparative analysis of different environmental loading methods and their impacts on the GPS height time series
Date de publication/diffusion :
2013
Titre du périodique :
Journal of Geodesy
ISSN :
0949-7714
Maison d'édition :
Springer-Verlag
Volume/Tome :
87
Fascicule/Saison :
7
Pagination :
687-703
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Disponible sur ORBilu :
depuis le 20 août 2013

Statistiques


Nombre de vues
224 (dont 16 Unilu)
Nombre de téléchargements
1 (dont 0 Unilu)

citations Scopus®
 
123
citations Scopus®
sans auto-citations
87
OpenCitations
 
74
citations OpenAlex
 
118
citations WoS
 
109

Bibliographie


Publications similaires



Contacter ORBilu