Application of Raman Spectroscopy for Detection of Histologically Distinct Areas in Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) Glioblastoma
Klamminger, Gilbert Georg; {"lastName":"GERARDY", "firstNames":"Jean-Jacques","affiliations":["University of Luxembourg \u003e Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB)"]},,,,,,,,, Taichung, Taiwan"]}; Jelke, Finnet al.
[en] Background
Although microscopic assessment is still the diagnostic gold standard in pathology, non-light microscopic methods such as new imaging methods and molecular pathology have considerably contributed to more precise diagnostics. As an upcoming method, Raman spectroscopy (RS) offers a "molecular fingerprint" which could be used to differentiate tissue heterogeneity or diagnostic entities. RS has been successfully applied on fresh and frozen tissue, however more aggressively, chemically treated tissue such as formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples are challenging for RS.
Methods
To address this issue, we examined FFPE samples of morphologically highly heterogeneous glioblastoma (GBM) using RS in order to classify histologically defined GBM areas according to RS spectral properties. We have set up a SVM (support vector machine)-based classifier in a training cohort and corroborated our findings in a validation cohort.
Results
Our trained classifier identified distinct histological areas such as tumor core and necroses in GBM with an overall accuracy of 70.5% based on spectral properties of RS. With an absolute misclassification of 21 out of 471 Raman measurements, our classifier has the property of precisely distinguishing between normal appearing brain tissue and necrosis. When verifying the suitability of our classifier system in a second independent dataset, very little overlap between necrosis and normal appearing brain tissue can be detected.
Conclusion
These findings show that histologically highly variable samples such as GBM can be reliably recognized by their spectral properties using RS. As a conclusion, we propose that RS may serve useful as a future method in the pathological toolbox.
Disciplines :
Human health sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Auner GW, Koya SK, Huang C, et al. Applications of Raman spectroscopy in cancer diagnosis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018;37(4):691-717.
Anna I, Bartosz P, Lech P, Halina A. Novel strategies of Raman imaging for brain tumor research. Oncotarget. 2017;8(49):85290-85310.
Zhang J, Fan Y, He M, et al. Accuracy of Raman spectroscopy in differentiating brain tumor from normal brain tissue. Oncotarget. 2017;8(22):36824-36831.
Singh R. C. V. Raman and the discovery of the raman effect. Phys Perspect. 2002;4(4):399-420.
Livermore LJ, Isabelle M, Bell IM, et al. Rapid intraoperative molecular genetic classification of gliomas using Raman spectroscopy. Neurooncol Adv. 2019;1(1):vdz008.
DePaoli D, Lemoine É, Ember K, et al. Rise of Raman spectroscopy in neurosurgery: a review. J Biomed Opt. 2020;25(5):1-36.
Huang Z, McWilliams A, Lam S, et al. Effect of formalin fixation on the near-infrared Raman spectroscopy of normal and cancerous human bronchial tissues. Int J Oncol. 2003;23(3):649-655.
Draux F, Gobinet C, Sulé-Suso J, et al. Raman spectral imaging of single cancer cells: probing the impact of sample fixation methods. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;397(7):2727-2737.
Gaifulina R, Maher AT, Kendall C, et al. Label-free Raman spectroscopic imaging to extract morphological and chemical information from a formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded rat colon tissue section. Int J Exp Pathol. 2016;97(4)::337-350.
Fullwood LM, Clemens G, Griffiths D, et al. Investigating the use of Raman and immersion Raman spectroscopy for spectral histopathology of metastatic brain cancer and primary sites of origin. Anal Methods. 2014;6(12):3948-3961.
Mian S, Colley H, Thornhill M, Rehman I. Development of a dewaxing protocol for tissue-engineered models of the oral mucosa used for Raman spectroscopic analysis. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2014;49:614-617.
Faoláin EO, Hunter MB, Byrne JM, et al. Raman spectroscopic evaluation of efficacy of current paraffin wax section dewaxing agents. J Histochem Cytochem. 2005;53(1):121-129.
Fullwood LM, Ashton K, Dawson T, et al. Effect of substrate choice and tissue type on tissue preparation for spectral histopathology by Raman microspectroscopy. Analyst. 2014:446-454.
Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, et al. World health organization classification of tumours of the central nervous system. In: Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, eds. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2016.
Wirsching HG, Galanis E, Weller M. Glioblastoma. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;134:381-397.
Lemée JM, Clavreul A, Menei P. Intratumoral heterogeneity in glioblastoma: don't forget the peritumoral brain zone. Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(10):1322-1332.
D'Alessio A, Proietti G, Sica G, Scicchitano BM. Pathological and molecular features of glioblastoma and its peritumoral tissue. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11(4):469.
Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M, et al. DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature. 2018;555(7697):469-474.
Silantyev AS, Falzone L, Libra M, et al. Current and future trends on diagnosis and prognosis of glioblastoma: from molecular biology to proteomics. Cells. 2019;8(8):863.
Reddy SP, Britto R, Vinnakota K, et al. Novel glioblastoma markers with diagnostic and prognostic value identified through transcriptome analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(10):2978-2987.
Jovčevska I. Next generation sequencing and machine learning technologies are painting the epigenetic portrait of glioblastoma. Front Oncol. 2020;10(May):1-14.
Deo RC. Machine learning in medicine. Circulation. 2015;132(20):1920-1930.
Qifang Bi, Goodman KE, Kaminsky J, Lessler J. What is Machine Learning? A primer for the epidemiologist. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(12):2222-2239. doi:10.1093/aje/kwz189.
Komura D, Ishikawa S. Machine learning approaches for pathologic diagnosis. Virchows Arch. 2019;475(2):131-138.
Pallua JD, Brunner A, Zelger B, Schirmer M, Haybaeck J. The future of pathology is digital. Pathol Res Pract. 2020;216(9):153040.
Rashidi HH, Tran NK, Betts EV, Howell LP, Green R. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in pathology: the present landscape of supervised methods. Acad Pathol. 2019;6:2374289519873088.
Smith WS, Keenan KJ, Lovoi PA. A unique signature of cardiac-induced cranial forces during acute large vessel stroke and development of a predictive model. Neurocrit Care. 2020;33(1):58-63.
Hertz AM, Hertz NM, Johnsen NV. Identifying bladder rupture following traumatic pelvic fracture: a machine learning approach. Injury. 2020;51(2):334-339.
Official Journal of the European Union. General Data Protection Regulation. 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679. Accessed November 5, 2020.
WMA - The World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinkiethical- principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed November 9, 2020.
Crystran, Poole, UK. Raman Grade Calcium Fluoride. https://www. crystran.co.uk/raman-substrate-materials. Accessed November 3, 2020.
Hara A, Kanayama T, Noguchi K, et al. Treatment strategies based on histological targets against invasive and resistant glioblastoma. J oncol. 2019;2019:2964783.
TSI, Shoreview, USA. ProRaman-L High Performance Raman Spectrometer -. https://tsi.com/discontinued-products/proraman-l-highperformance- raman-spectrometer/. Accessed November 3, 2020.
Menges F. "Spectragryph - optical spectroscopy software." 2020;(Version 1..2.14). http://www.effemm2.de/spectragryph/. Accessed November 4, 2020.
MathWork, Natick, MA. Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox Documentation - MathWorks Deutschland. https://de.mathworks. com/help/stats/index.html?s_tid=CRUX_lftnav. Accessed November 4, 2020.
MathWork, Natick, MA. Select Data and Validation for Classification Problem - MATLAB & Simulink - MathWorks Deutschland. https:// de.mathworks.com/help/stats/select-data-and-validation-forclassification- problem.html. Accessed November 4, 2020.
Koljenović S, Choo-Smith LP, Bakker Schut TC, Kros JM, van den Berge HJ, Puppels GJ. Discriminating vital tumor from necrotic tissue in human glioblastoma tissue samples by Raman spectroscopy. Lab Invest. 2002;82(10):1265-1277.
Kast R, Auner G, Yurgelevic S, et al. Identification of regions of normal grey matter and white matter from pathologic glioblastoma and necrosis in frozen sections using Raman imaging. J Neurooncol. 2015;125(2):287-295.
Amharref N, Beljebbar A, Dukic S, et al. Discriminating healthy from tumor and necrosis tissue in rat brain tissue samples by Raman spectral imaging. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768(10):2605-2615.