Reference : Policy Experimentation in Committees: A Case Against Veto Rights Under Redistributive...
Scientific journals : Article
Business & economic sciences : Economic systems & public economics
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/45496
Policy Experimentation in Committees: A Case Against Veto Rights Under Redistributive Constraints
English
Anesi, Vincent mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Economics and Management (DEM) >]
Bowen, Renee mailto [University of California, San Diego > School of Global Policy and Strategy]
In press
American Economic Journal. Microeconomics
American Economic Association
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
1945-7669
1945-7685
Nashville
TN
[en] We study optimal policy experimentation by a committee. We consider a dynamic bargaining game in which committee members choose either a risky reform or a safe alternative each period. When no redistribution is allowed the unique equilibrium outcome is generically inefficient. When redistribution is allowed (even small amounts), there always exists an equilibrium that supports optimal experimentation for any voting rule without veto players. With veto players, however, optimal policy experimentation is possible only with a sufficient amount of redistribution. We conclude that veto rights are more of an obstacle to optimal policy experimentation than the constraints on redistribution themselves.
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/45496
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mic.20190023&&from=f

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
PolicyExperimentation_01232018.pdfAuthor preprint673.89 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.