Full Text

?

CITATIONS

? Total citations

? Recent citations

n/a Field Citation Ratio

n/a Relative Citation Ratio

publications

0

supporting

0

mentioning

0

contrasting

0

Smart Citations

0

0

0

0

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

• S Carrera and V Mitsilegas (eds), Constitutionalising the Security Union: Effectiveness, Rule of Law and Rights in Countering Terrorism and Crime (Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies, 2017) 99–111
• K Ligeti and G Robinson, ‘Transnational Enforcement of Production Orders for Electronic Evidence: Beyond Mutual Recognition?’ in R Kert and A Lehner (eds), Vielfalt des Strafrechts im Internationalen Kontext: Festschrift für Frank Höpfel zum 65. Geburtstag (NWV, 2018).
• V Franssen and M Corhay, ‘La Fin de la Saga Skype: Les Fournisseurs de Services Étrangers Obligés de Collaborer avec la Justice Belge en Dépit des Possibilités Techniques et de leurs Obligations en Droit Étranger’ (2019) 8 Revue de Droit Commercial Belge 1014.
• Vanessa Franssen and Adrien Masset (eds), Les droits du justiciable face à la justice pénale (Anthemis, 2017) 205, 242.
• N Boister and RJ Currie (eds), Routledge Handbook of Transnational Criminal Law, 1st edn (Abingdon, Routledge, 2015) 391.
• V Mitsilegas, ‘The New EU–US Co-operation on Extradition, Mutual Legal Assistance and the Exchange of Police Data’ (2003) 8 European Foreign Affairs Review 515.
• FJ Säcker, R Rixecker and H Oetker (eds), Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch, 7th edn (Schuldrecht – Allgemeiner Teil, 2016) vol 2, § 241, margin number 46.
• D Flore and V Franssen (eds), Société Numérique et Droit Pénal, 1st edn (Brussels, Bruylant 2019) 277.
• MA Biasotti, ‘A Proposed Electronic Evidence Exchange across the European Union’ (2017) 14(1) Digital Evidence and Electronic Signature Law Review 2.
• V Mitsilegas, ‘The Privatisation of Mutual Trust in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice: The Case of e-Evidence’ (2018) 25(3) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 263.
• G De Kerhove and A Weyembergh (eds), La Confiance Mutuelle dans l’Espace Pénal Européen/Mutual Trust in the European Criminal Area (Brussels, Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2005) 17–28.
• L Bachmaier, ‘Mutual Recognition and Cross-Border Interception of Communications’ in C Brière and AWeyembergh (eds), The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law: Past, Present and Future (Oxford, Hart, 2018) 330–34.
• Brière and Weyembergh, The Needed Balances in EU Criminal Law (n 103) 306–08.
• V Mitsilegas, ‘Trust’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 70.
• P de Hert, C Parlar and J Sajfert, ‘The Cybercrime Convention Committee’s 2017 Guidance Note on Production Orders: Unilateralist Transborder Access to Electronic Evidence Promoted via Soft Law’ (2018) 34 Computer Law & Security Review 327.
• S Tosza, ‘All Evidence Is Equal, but Electronic Evidence Is More Equal than Any Other – The Relationship Between the European Investigation Order and the European Production Order’ (2020) 11(2) New Journal of European Criminal Law n 106.
• I Cameron, ‘Balancing Data Protection and Law Enforcement Needs: Tele2 Sverige and Watson’ (2017) 54 CML Rev 1467, 1481–86.
• M Carolan, ‘Graham Dwyer Phone Data Appeal Referred to European Court of Justice’ (Irish Times, 24 February 2020) www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/courts/supreme-court/graham-dwyer-phone-data-appeal-referred-to-european-court-of-justice-1.4183093
• D Fennelly, ‘Data Retention: The Life, Death and Afterlife of a Directive’ (2019) 19 ERA Forum 673, 688–89.
• G Boulet and P De Hert, ‘Cooperation Between the Private Sector and Law Enforcement Agencies: An Area in Between Legal Regulations’ in H Aden (ed), Police Cooperation in the European Union under the Treaty of Lisbon: Opportunities and Limitations (Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2015) 245
• N Purtova, ‘Between the GDPR and the Police Directive: Navigating Through the Maze of Information Sharing in Public–Private Partnerships’ (2018) 8(1) International Data Privacy Law 52.
• G Robinson, ‘Report: The European Commission’s e-Evidence Proposal’ (2018) 4(3) European Data Protection Law Review 347, 350.
• SAllegrezza and V Covolo (eds), Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings: A European and Comparative Study on Judicial Remedies (Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2018).
• F Bignami (ed), EU Law in Populist Times: Crises and Prospects (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2020) 334.
• T Christakis and K Propp, ‘The Legal Nature of the UK–US Cloud Agreement’(Cross-Border Data Forum, 20 April 2020) www.crossborderdataforum.org/the-legal-nature-of-the-uk-us-cloud-agreement/.