Reference : Competing Institutional Logics and Paradoxical Universalism in Disabled People’s Scho...
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Sociology & social sciences
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Education & instruction
Educational Sciences
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/42387
Competing Institutional Logics and Paradoxical Universalism in Disabled People’s School-to-work Transitions: Comparing Switzerland and the United States
English
Tschanz, Christoph [University of Fribourg, Switzerland]
Powell, Justin J W mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS) >]
2020
Social Inclusion
Cogitatio
8
1
‘Universalism’ or ‘Universalisms’ in Social Policies?
155-167
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
2183-2803
Lisbon
Portugal
[en] Disability ; Education ; Work ; Employment ; Comparative Education ; Comparative Social Policy ; Disability Policy ; Educational Policy ; Institutions ; Institutional Logics ; Organizations ; Classification ; School-to-work Transitions
[en] Disablement is a complex social phenomenon in contemporary societies, reflected in disability policies oriented towards contrasting paradigms. Fraught with ambivalence, disability raises dilemmas of classification and targeted supports. Paradoxical universalism emphasizes that to achieve universality requires recognizing individual dis/abilities and particularity contextual conditions and barriers that lead to disablement. Myriad aspects of educational and disability policies challenge both conceptualization and realization of universal policies, such as compulsory schooling, with widespread exclusion or segregation prevalent. Tensions between providing supports and ubiquitous stigmatization and separation that results are endemic—particularly evident during life course transitions that imply shifting memberships in institutions and organizations. Young adults’ transitions from school-to-work are fundamentally challenged by contrasting policies, institutional logics, and institutionalized organizations, particularly visible during inter-institutional transitions. Analyzing institutional logics facilitates understanding of the lack of inter-institutional coordination that hinders successful transitions for disabled youth. Examining such challenges in the United States and Switzerland, we compare two cases with liberal labor markets and federal governance structures but also with contrasting education, welfare and employment systems. Whereas lacking inter-institutional coordination negatively impacts disabled young adults in the US, Switzerland’s robust vocational education and training (VET) system, while not a panacea, does provide more coordinated support during transitions from school-to-work. These two countries provide relevant cases to examine ambivalence and contestation around the human right to inclusive education as well as the universality of the right (not) to work.
Education, Culture, Cognition & Society (ECCS) > Institute of Education & Society (InES)
Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)
Doc.CH grant 172008
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/42387
10.17645/si.v8i1.2373

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
TschanzPowell_2020_School-to-WorkTransitionsDisabledYouthInstLogics_CH-US_SocialInclusion.pdfPublisher postprint317.18 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.