Article (Scientific journals)
The Human Rights Defence in International Investment Arbitration: Exploring the Limtis of Systemic Integration
Fahner, Johannes; Happold, Matthew
2019In International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 68 (3), p. 741-759
Peer reviewed


Full Text
Publisher postprint (241.37 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to


Keywords :
Public international law; International investment arbitration; Human rights; Law of treaties
Abstract :
[en] In a variety of investment arbitration cases, respondent States have argued that the measure complained of by the investor was mandated by the State’s human rights obligations. This defence raises intricate questions concerning the relationship between international investment law and human rights law. Tribunals have generally been reluctant to engage with the argument and to interpret the relationship between investment law and human rights in a straightforward manner. This article discusses two other possibilities: harmonious interpretation and prioritisation. Harmonious interpretation seeks to read provisions from investment treaties and human rights treaties together, whereas prioritisation gives normative superiority to one provision over another. We conclude that harmonious interpretation is facilitated by the discretionary character of common treaty standards in both human rights and investment law, but that the final result is not likely to be very different from prioritisation, because even harmonious interpretation requires that one provision is read in the light of, and thereby subjugated to, another provision.
Disciplines :
European & international law
Author, co-author :
Fahner, Johannes;  University of Amsterdam
Happold, Matthew ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Law Research Unit
External co-authors :
Language :
Title :
The Human Rights Defence in International Investment Arbitration: Exploring the Limtis of Systemic Integration
Publication date :
18 June 2019
Journal title :
International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom
Volume :
Issue :
Pages :
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Focus Area :
Law / European Law
Available on ORBilu :
since 24 September 2019


Number of views
297 (8 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
2 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
WoS citations


Similar publications

Contact ORBilu