Article (Scientific journals)
Remédiation et réénonciation : opérations et régimes de sens
Colas-Blaise, Marion
2018In Interin, 23 (1), p. 64-84
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Colas-BlaiseRemédiation et réénonciation .docx
Author preprint (174.23 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Semiotics; Remediation; Reenunciation
Abstract :
[en] Remediation and reenunciation : operations and regimes of meaning In this paper, we strive to develop the notion of remediation, especially from the theoretical and methodological point of view of Greimassian and post-Greimassian semiotics. More specifically, the semiotics of enunciation approaches the notion of (re)mediation from three different perspectives: from the angle of the “native” mediation, which corresponds to the experience an instance has of the world (Fontanille 2017) ; from the angle of the meaningful configurations brought together in the enunciative praxis ; finally, from the angle of (re)mediational elements involved in the dynamics responsible for the evolution of meaningful objects (Colas-Blaise 2016). Our paper addresses three issues. First, our attention is focused on the operations of remediation : the recontextualization (act upon the environment), the remediatization (change to another media), the reformatting (change to another format), the remedialization (transform the medium) and the retextualization (change the micro- and macrotextual relations). From the enunciative point of view and, more precisely, from the perspective of tensive semiotics (Fontanille & Zilberberg 1998), these operations are related to complex dispositives that incorporate and deal with the features of the meaningful objects (origin and destination). Secondly, we explore the regimes of remediation : hybridization, bricolage, “metissage” or cross-fertilisation and spectacularization. We focus on the digital field (Colas-Blaise 2017) (filmed opera, Google Arts & Culture Project, Visual Aesthetics by Manovich, Living Mona Lisa). Finally, we emphasize the modalities of the reception of the meaningful objects: the notions of immediacy and hypermediacy (Bolter & Grusin 1999) are studied in the light of the notions of immersion, participation (“participative culture” (Jenkins)) and the creation of a reflexive distance. Bibliography Bolter Jay D. & Grusin, Richard, 1999, Remediation. Understanding New Media, Cambridge, MIT Press. Colas-Blaise, Marion, 2016, « Pour une sémiotique de la médiation : théories et pratiques, in D. Bertrand, M. Colas-Blaise, I. Darrault-Harris, V. Estay Stange (dirs), Sens et médiation, AFS Éditions [En ligne]. Colas-Blaise, Marion, 2017, « Énonciation et remédiation. De la peinture à la vidéo », in T. Migliore (dir.), Remediazioni. Immagini Interattive, Rome, Aracne, pp. 151-166. Fontanille, Jacques, 2017, « L’énonciation pratique à l’œuvre dans l’intermédialité et la remédiation », in T. Migliore (dir.), Remediazioni. Immagini Interattive, Rome, Aracne, pp. 231-244. Fontanille, Jacques & Zilberberg, Claude, 1998, Tension et signification, Hayen, Pierre Mardaga. Key-words: remediation, operations, regimes of meaning, immediacy/hypermediacy, metarealism
Disciplines :
Languages & linguistics
Author, co-author :
Colas-Blaise, Marion ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE)
External co-authors :
no
Language :
French
Title :
Remédiation et réénonciation : opérations et régimes de sens
Alternative titles :
[en] Remediation and reenunciation: operations and regimes of meaning
Publication date :
2018
Journal title :
Interin
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Pages :
64-84
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Focus Area :
Multilingualism and Intercultural Studies
Available on ORBilu :
since 18 January 2019

Statistics


Number of views
166 (0 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
38 (0 by Unilu)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu